Janesville police officers see benefit in body cameras
Reader poll
Photo
JANESVILLE Whether or not they call for backup, Janesville police officers are filing hours of video files that will back up the officers in court or against the claim of an angry resident.
The Janesville Police Department took a few tries to find the perfect body camera, but for several months now officers have been electronically recording all their interactions with residents.
The video comes in handy during interviews, handling complaints and writing reports, officer Erin Briggs said.
In one instance, a resident complained that an officer did not explain why he had pulled her over and issued a traffic citation. A review of the video showed the officer had indeed explained the problem, why he was issuing a ticket and what the driver needed to do to follow up, Briggs said.
"It just kind of takes away the question mark," Briggs said.
The department was surprised to learn one of the ways officers like using the cameras, Briggs said. Officers find it helpful to watch the video while writing reports about intoxicated driving arrests.
It's hard to write notes about a field sobriety test when you have to watch someone attempt the test and count the number of steps he or she is taking, Briggs said. In the past, officers had to juggle a flashlight and a clipboard while never taking eyes off the suspected drunken driver, he said.
Now, the camera records the necessary information, and the officer can concentrate on the field sobriety test, he said.
"You can keep your eyes on them," he said.
The video cameras are about the size of a Bic lighter and clip onto an officer's uniform. They can be turned on and off with one touch, Deputy Chief John Olsen said.
At the end of a shift, officers download the video and leave cameras for the next shift. The department has about 40 cameras, which is more than enough to cover a shift but not enough for every officer to have his or her own, Olsen said.
The cameras cost about $75 each. They are a much better deal and more practical than previous models the department tried, Olsen said. The Janesville department has been using body cameras in one form or another for four years, Briggs said.
Previous models were more expensive and interfered with officers' radios and weren't used as consistently, Briggs said.
The cameras save time and hassle, Briggs said.
Officers are required to record interviews with juveniles, for example. In the past, officers had to take a juvenile to the police department to tape an interview. Now, they can record interviews in the field, he said.
Officers can wait to download videos at the end of a shift or download them onto laptops immediately after an incident, Briggs said.
Police do not have to inform people they are recording an interview or a traffic stop. Wisconsin is a one-party consent state. That means at least one, but not both, participants in a recorded conversation need to know the conversation is being recorded, Briggs said.
People familiar with the department or the officers have gotten to know what it means when an officer turns on a camera. It seems to encourage cooperation, Briggs said.
"It changes people's behavior," Briggs said. "At least once they're being recorded."


May 7, 2012 at 1:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
yes- on all of the time- what is the point then if you can turn on or not turn on. All should be recorded. You never know when things will go bad.
May 7, 2012 at 1:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
This is a good idea.
May 7, 2012 at 1 p.m.
Suggest removal
I like it! As the article says, WI is a one party consent state. Personally, I record any interactions with the police just in case there are any issues.
May 7, 2012 at 9:27 a.m.
Suggest removal
As long as law enforcement will allow citizens to video law enforcement actions in public, then all's fair. Unfortunately, there is a disturbing trend by law enforcement on "cracking down" on public videotaping law enforcement.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/2011082...
May 7, 2012 at 9:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
Another example of the great job Chief Moore is doing. Best chief in decades...
May 7, 2012 at 8:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yes Deleted, everyone likes their freedom. However, chances are if you are dealing with the police you may have done something to give up that freedom. Regardless, these cameras protect the officer, any other subject involved and will SAVE taxpayer money when the city isn't fighting some BS lawsuit by some thug who said he "got beat up" by the police. They are $75 cameras and are well worth it.
May 7, 2012 at 8:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
I think it is a great idea as long as they keep it on any and all the time there is interaction with the public. It will protect both the cops and our own rights. The only people that will have a problem with these being used are the people that are doing something wrong. Too bad for them. Congrats to Janesville for finding a camera that isn't so overly expensive. This one looks like a great deal.
May 7, 2012 at 6:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
Maybe everyone needs to have a camera to watch each other at all times
That has already started with so many people with camera phones
May 7, 2012 at 4:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
HoChunk is a bigger waste of your money than officers having cameras.
May 7, 2012 at 4:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
Sounds to me like those worried about their behavior are the ones complaining about the cameras. Look at it this way, if you aren't doing anything wrong chances are you won't be recorded!
May 7, 2012 at 1:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
Do you guys just sit around and think of ways to waste the tax payers money?this use to be a great state,now its like a.police state.people dont even want to come here to visit anymore. and rock county has got to be the worst.they will pull you over.for anything lol.i got pulled over one year on my birthday,mind you i just turned 50.the officer says where you going this late at nite?i thought none of your damn business.but of course i didnt say it,in fear of getting tasered!i said why did you pull me over?he said i went thru a yellow light,i said no i didnt.and i didnt.so,then he tells me my plates were expired lol cuz i didnt change them on the date i got them.at that time i didnt know i had to.lol luckily he let me go so i could be on my way to ho chunck for my birthday.its always something.more waste of money.
May 6, 2012 at 10:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
Cool...does that mean the general public can wear cameras as well...we can all edit and use photoshop together!! fair is fair
May 6, 2012 at 10:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Ridiculous recording? I hope you are kidding...
May 6, 2012 at 6:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
I've got a Muvi just like that.
Here's a video with it strapped to a model airplane, and to my head.
http://youtu.be/HNcRycT6z8M
May 6, 2012 at 5:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
So, the next time there's an officer shooting, will the video be there, or unfortunately erased?
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.