DOT suspends highway bypass plan indefinitely

By STAN MILAM   Saturday, May 19, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— The Wisconsin Department of Transportation announced Friday it is backing off a study for a bypass connecting highways 11 and 14 west of Janesville, in part because of intense local opposition.

When Michael Everhart of rural Janesville read the April 8 story in The Gazette announcing a meeting to discuss the bypass, he viewed it as a call to arms. Two farms in his family, one owned by his grandmother, the other by his father, would lose land depending on the proposed bypass route.

“That’s when I decided to get involved,” said Everhart, who heads up Neighbors United, a grassroots organization opposing the bypass. “They have been talking about this for a couple of years, but when I read that story, I knew it was time to act.”

Neighbors United circulated a petition, put up yard signs along Highway 14 and attended public meetings. Their efforts were rewarded when DOT Secretary Mark Gottlieb announced the department would “indefinitely” suspend development of the environmental impact statement for the project.

Everhart, a project engineer with Pieper Power, set up the organization’s social media content, including a Facebook page.

Doug Rebout, whose family has several farms in the area, would have seen one farm cut in half with the loss of about 35 acres.

“I think the DOT always wanted to tie this to the I-90/39 expansion, and when they saw that we caught wind of it, they backed down,” he said.

The DOT decision effectively puts the bypass project on the back burner until at least 2019, according to DOT estimates.

At issue for Neighbors United was whether the bypass would become part of the Interstate 90/39 project. Such inclusion in the project would allow the bypass to proceed without what’s called enumeration as a major highway project. The department decided the bypass needed to be reviewed, thereby placing it on a long waiting list.

The bypass proposal had five options, which included doing nothing. The two most controversial options, labeled W4 and W5, required seizing some farmland and houses.

Gottlieb announced the department’s decision in a letter to Sen. Tim Cullen, D-Janesville, and Rep. Evan Wynn, R-Whitewater. He acknowledged citizen opposition to the proposal.

“Because of intense public and legislative interest in this study, I’ve directed our staff … to analyze how the two bypass alternatives would rank against other likely major project candidates,” he said.

“The bypass alternatives would not rank highly enough to warrant a recommendation for enumeration within a reasonable period of time,” Gottlieb said. “Therefore, I’ve directed that further development of the EIS, as it relates to the west Janesville area, be suspended indefinitely.”

Long-term work on environmental studies for the Highway 14 corridor between Darien and Janesville will continue, Gottlieb said.

“The department confirmed what we’ve been saying all along,” Everhart said. “Our concern was that if it was an alternative I-90/39 route during the expansion work, we’d end up with a four-lane ghost town when the Interstate project was completed.”

Credit for stopping the bypass should go to many, including the more than 1,800 people and 59 businesses who signed the petition, Everhart said.

“I also want to thank the town of Janesville board and the help of Sen. Cullen and Rep. Wynn,” he said.

Cullen applauded Gottlieb’s decision.

“I’m very happy for the people whose houses and farmland will not be destroyed because of this unneeded project,” Cullen said. “I’m very grateful to Sec. Gottlieb for his handling of this matter at the very top of the department, and, of course, I’m grateful for his decision.”

Wynn did not return calls for comments on this story.

Cullen and Wynn, in a May 15 letter to Gottlieb, pointed out that the Wisconsin Legislative Council said advancing the bypass without the enumeration would raise serious legal concerns.

“The idea of sidestepping legislative oversight and public scrutiny … would engender little public support, and attaching the bypass to the I-90/39 expansion project would raise serious questions regarding its immediate necessity and independent utility,” Cullen and Wynn said.

Everhart said Neighbors United will continue to monitor construction plans in the area.

“Janesville could grow to the west and other things could affect transportation needs,” he said. “Maybe something will be needed down the line, but we believe a bypass is not needed now.”

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(14)
Michael_Everhart
May 21, 2012 at 10:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

Thanks to everyone that helped our cause. Three Generations of Residents joined together to fight an unjustifiable proposal. The full letter from the DOT is available on our Facebook Page. Here is an excerpt.
"I've directed our staff, using available data that has been obtained through the environmental study process, to analyze how the two bypass alternatives would rank against other likely major project candidates throughout the state. That analysis indicates that the bypass alternatives would not rank highly enough to warrant a recommendation for enumeration within a reasonable period of time. Therefore, I've directed that further development of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as it relates to the west Janesville area, be suspended indefinitely. Long-term work on the environmental studies for the corridor between Darien and Janesville will continue, pursuant to the direction given to us by the TPC in 2003."
http://www.facebook.com/JVLWINOBYPASS

Jvlhomeowner
May 20, 2012 at 3:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

Jshiner -
I agree that hwy 14 needs upgrading, however this bypass is all about creating a new road,
taking farm land and homes, not fixing what we have.

partarican1
May 20, 2012 at 2:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

both highways still need to be upgraded....so what's next?

hdonlybob
May 20, 2012 at 1:21 p.m.
Suggest removal

This is good news, and a great example of neighbors pulling together and making their voices heard......regardless of their political affiliation.... See it can work...

jshiner
May 20, 2012 at 12:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

Highway 14 from Hwy 51(sheriffs dept)to Oregon needs to be upgraded for safety sake. The traffic & crash data prove it. Throw a tractor or school bus in the picture & it's a nightmare. Sometimes progress in the name of safety come with a price. I'm out there everyday,So many of you writing never leave your bubble & really do not see the entire "Big picture". Let progress happen. Granted the option that was fought by the "neighbors united" really was not the best.

gwendt
May 20, 2012 at 10:50 a.m.
Suggest removal

OMG how did this slip past the Gazette editors??? a Democrat praising a Republican Department Head !!! someone's gonna lose their job.

Jvlhomeowner
May 20, 2012 at 10:45 a.m.
Suggest removal

Glad to hear this!
I've said it before, and will repeat... Any new project that takes away farm land in this part of the state nees to have very close examination.
We grow FOOD here, stuff we should be eating to sustain our lives. The DOT looks at a map from "on high" and draws a line, they don't look at or care about what they are destroying.
We have a DOT truck scale complex that destroyed some of the most fertile land in the state, acreage that produced food, because the DOT insisted it had to placed right there. The site is closed more than it is open. Darn right we need to set these people right!

DwightKSchrute
May 20, 2012 at 9:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

Progress, when not necessary, is called waste.

cynicaleye
May 20, 2012 at 7:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

EMMO46 and wtp: How about we run the bypass through your neighborhood? See how you'd like it. It's time for people to stand up and say NO like these people did. It's a waste of money and destructive of the environment.

wtp
May 20, 2012 at 7:24 a.m.
Suggest removal

maybe in your eyes a by pass is not necessary but for many others now in the future it will save time and gas money to many to get to there destination quicker and safer. future progress will prevail.

phylljb
May 19, 2012 at 8:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

Emmo46: It's not just their back yards they worry about. It's their farm land and livelihood. The bypass is not necessary.

EMMO46
May 19, 2012 at 6:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

NIMBY's!
It will happen sooner or later. Progress is often resisted, but you cannot stop it.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT