Romney's Bain playbook unclear as attacks grow

By STEVE PEOPLES   Tuesday, May 22, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo


Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney speaks at the River City Brewing Company, Thursday, May 17, 2012, in Jacksonville, Fla.

Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney speaks at the River City Brewing Company, Thursday, May 17, 2012, in Jacksonville, Fla.

— The core of his presidential candidacy under attack, Mitt Romney has yet to shape a playbook to defend a quarter-century in the business world that created great riches for himself and great hardship, at times, for some American workers.

Romney and his aides have struggled to respond consistently to intensifying criticism about his tenure at Bain Capital and how it would be reflected in his presidency. The lack of a cohesive message stems, in part, from Romney's fundamental belief that any debate that puts the economy front and center is a win for Republicans. Public polling shows most Americans are not satisfied with the pace of the recovery under Obama's watch.

The election, Romney aides say, will be a referendum on Obama's economic leadership far more than a question of Romney's business career, regardless of how much Democrats highlight that issue.

So far, Romney aides have let Democrats — led by President Barack Obama — do most of the talking.

Obama sharply attacked Romney's background as a venture capitalist on Monday, offering his most expansive comments to date about how Romney's role as founder of the Boston-based private equity firm doesn't necessarily translate to the White House.

"If your main argument for how to grow the economy is 'I knew how to make a lot of money for investors,' then you're missing what this job is about," Obama said during a news conference at an international summit in Chicago. "It doesn't mean you weren't good at private equity, but that's not what my job is as president. My job is to take into account everybody, not just some. My job is to make sure that the country is growing not just now, but 10 years from now and 20 years from now."

He added: "This is not a distraction. This is what this campaign is going to be about — is what is a strategy for us to move this country forward in a way where everybody can succeed?"

Romney did not respond personally to the broadside. Instead, his campaign issued a written statement as he courted donors on Wall Street in the midst of a three-day fundraising tour. In the statement, Romney said Obama was once again attacking the free enterprise system.

"What this election is about is the 23 million Americans who are still struggling to find work and the millions who have lost their homes and have fallen into poverty," he said. "President Obama refuses to accept moral responsibility for his failed policies. My campaign is offering a positive agenda to help America get back to work."

The Romney campaign has offered several defenses since Obama's re-election team launched an all-out assault against Bain: It's a simple distraction, an affront to free markets, an attempt to divide the nation, a misreading of the firm's success. The Romney campaign released a Web video last week featuring workers from an Indiana company that benefited from Bain's involvement.

However, Romney himself has generally avoided the issue as he spends most of his time privately raising money. He ignored Obama's criticism during a $2,500-a-plate reception at the Waldorf-Astoria hotel.

"I understand the economy because I've lived in it," he said. "And by the way, I've been successful, but I've also lost. There's sometimes I failed. I probably learned more from failures than from the successes. But I know how this economy works."

Romney's relative silence was made possible, in part, by a gaffe by Newark, N.J., Mayor Cory Booker, an Obama supporter who on Sunday called exchanges by the campaigns over Bain "nauseating" and a distraction from issues that interest voters. He walked back his comments after they dominated the campaign news for a day.

Obama is running television ads across five swing states featuring a former worker who likens the firm Romney founded to a vampire. The president's re-election campaign has also released Web videos and hosted multiple conference calls with employees from companies that suffered under Bain's leadership.

Romney senior aide Stuart Stevens described the television ad as "performance art gibberish."

"Shouting louder and getting more angry is not very persuasive," Stevens said in response to the line of attack. "The idea that people are walking around with less of a paycheck or higher gas prices because of something Bain Capital did 20 years ago is absurd."

Romney faced similar criticism from former House Speaker Newt Gingrich during the Republican primary. Gingrich accused Romney of "looting a company" and suggested that he return money earned "from bankrupting companies and laying off employees over his years at Bain."

The argument helped fuel Gingrich's surprise victory in South Carolina. Democrats are betting big that it will help Obama win over working-class voters in November, citing polling that suggests Romney would struggle with lower-income voters. But exit polling from the GOP primary shows Romney won such voters about half of the time.

In a rare recent interview on Bain, Romney told a conservative radio host last week that the closure of a Florida factory under Bain's control was not his problem. "The steel factory closed down two years after I left Bain Capital. I was no longer there. So that's hardly something which is on my watch," he said.

The Obama campaign has pointed out, however, that Romney continued to profit from Bain's investments years after he left.

Romney also opened himself to new criticism by resurrecting a controversy over the number of jobs he created at Bain. In the radio interview, he jabbed the Obama campaign for failing to mention that Bain created "over 100,000 jobs." He has struggled for months to back up the jobs claim.

Bain offered this statement Monday responding to Democratic criticism: "Despite political attacks that emphasize the few companies that have struggled, the facts are that during Bain Capital's ownership, revenues grew in 80 percent of the more than 350 companies in which we have invested."

The former Massachusetts governor co-founded Bain in the early 1980s, but he left in 1999 to run the Salt Lake City Winter Olympics and pursue a political career. He has lived off his investments and retirement package ever since.

His net worth is now as much as $250 million, which would make him among the wealthiest presidents ever elected.

___

AP Deputy Director of Polling Jennifer Agiesta contributed to this report.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(18)
pharm
May 24, 2012 at 1:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

If only everybody really would stick to those sentiments the levels of personal attacks and juvenile name calling would go down on these posts. Arguing facts/stats/opinions is fine. Thank you.

SuperDave
May 24, 2012 at 1:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'll "bash" 'em both if it makes you feel better. Wrong is wrong.

pharm
May 24, 2012 at 7:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

Fine, the Bush administration started the program ,Green Energy for political gain, invited Solyndra to apply, pushed to have their guarantee approved. More money became available from the stimulus, and a chance to push Green Energy for political gain, so you want to bash one administration for doing what both did? Be fair if you are going to complain about stealing "our wealth". (Irag anyone?")

SuperDave
May 24, 2012 at 6:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

@pharm: From your last link, it is apparent that George Kaiser had ties to Solyndra and it's largest investor. He visited the White House 16 times. The fact that he did not attempt to personally profit is irrelevant. And the fact that the Bush administration worked on this "project" is also irrelevant. The point is this: when government gets involved in the private sector, the market gets skewed - scarce resources are misallocated for political gain. It's right there in your link - Obama used Solyndra as his poster child for green energy and the new economy. They failed, and we all pay the price. The private economy is perfectly capable of allocating resources, we do not need the iron fist of government to crush our freedoms and steal our wealth.

pharm
May 23, 2012 at 10:58 a.m.
Suggest removal

From Politifact, "First, the money wasn`t Obama`s to give. Solyndra request predated his administration, and career Energy Department officials handled the deal."
You people cannot use Politifact only when it suits you, or you become hypocrites.

NoLeftist
May 23, 2012 at 10:39 a.m.
Suggest removal

The Bush administration denied the Solyndra loan guarantees as one of its last acts, unlike Obama who not only approved them, but gave them MORE taxpayer money when it was clear to everyone else that they were going down.

You leftists are sooooo clueless.

pharm
May 23, 2012 at 10:11 a.m.
Suggest removal

http://www.politifact.com/florida/statem...
Better read before speaking, also explain why the Wal-Mart clan, investors in Solyndra, are not mentioned as being "friends of Barack." The Bush administration pushed this loan for 2 years, even into January of 2009.

SuperDave
May 23, 2012 at 9:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

More info. Obama "bundler" George Kaiser visited White House aides 16 times, yet denies lobbying . That of course doesn't pass the smell test.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solyndra_lo...

pharm
May 22, 2012 at 5:20 p.m.
Suggest removal

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...
Sorry about that! Here is the Solyndra story.

pharm
May 22, 2012 at 5:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

http://i.imgur.com/GDg99.gif
The truth about Solyndra.

SuperDave
May 22, 2012 at 4:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

Romney: 1; Obama: 0. You can't fix stupid. No experience doing anything productive cannot compete with many years of experience in the real world. Am I missing something here? Solyndra, anyone? Giving our money to campaign bundlers in a guaranteed bad "business" deal cannot compare to restructuring legitimate businesses so that new legitimate businesses can succeed. Please.

fearandrhetoric4dummies
May 22, 2012 at 1:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

Vato you need to research before labels:

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/0...

Under Obama, a Record Decline in Government Jobs

Unlike Ronald Reagan Obama Doesn’t Use Government Hiring To Create Jobs

start digging into the jobs numbers of President Obama and the President many conservatives enshrine, President Reagan and heres what you may find.

It turns out the trajectory of job creation under both Obama and Reagan are very similar, about a 45 degree angle, from the depths of job losses to job creation and economic expansion.

Here is the difference, when Reagan came into office the job losses were nowhere near as devastating as when Obama came into office. This means the hole was a lot deeper when President Obama took the reins.

The other statistic I found was that President Reagan’s unemployment rate drop was helped significantly by all governments, local, state and the federal also hiring. President Obama doesn’t have that luxury.

President Obama’s private sector job gains have been off set by massive layoffs in the public sector.

By Reagan’s last year of his first term is when the economy began adding jobs at a rate of 3.3 million jobs that year.

We are just beginning Obama’s last year of his first term. So let’s compare his third year.

President Obama’s economy added almost 2 million jobs in 2011. The kicker is during Reagan’s 3rd year, government employment didn’t lay off. They did under Obama, over 250 thousand people.

In 1985, Reagan reduced unemployment further with government hiring 1.8 million people. Those 2 million people spent money and caused even more growth in the private sector through increased demand.

If the public sector was hiring as it did under Reagan, unemployment may be 8% or less today

NoLeftist
May 22, 2012 at 12:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

I bet the article on how Obama's strategy on Solyndra will make it into the paper next week. Right after the major networks cover the Catholic Church's historic lawsuits over ObamaCare.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT