Quarry conditions outlined

By NEIL JOHNSON ( Contact )   Wednesday, May 23, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Reader pollAudio

Do you support the creation of a gravel quarry in Milton Township?

  

See the results and comments

PhotoVideo

— The town of Milton edged closer to a decision on a gravel quarry along North Klug Road, with its planning and zoning committee drafting a long list of conditions for the quarry Tuesday and authorizing its town attorney to formalize the list for further review at a meeting Monday, June 11.

The planning and zoning committee at that meeting could recommend to the town board whether to award a conditional-use permit, deciding the fate of a plan by B.R. Amon & Sons of Elkhorn and landowner Scott Traynor to develop a quarry on a glacial hill near wetlands and east of several residences along Klug Road.

The move came after town officials earlier had put the brakes on a decision on the quarry, telling Amon & Sons owner Tom Amon at a meeting last week that they wanted more information on his latest quarry plans.

It was Amon's second pitch for the quarry since the town board initially denied the project in February. Amon seeks to operate the quarry for up to five years to supply gravel to the Highway 26 bypass project and other nearby road construction projects.

Town officials spent nearly three hours Tuesday discussing and modifying a list of 18 conditions that Amon suggested in a project proposal. They include:

-- No blasting, no gravel washing, no well and no concrete mixing plant at the quarry.

-- Limited hours of operation at the quarry. Work could run from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday, with no operation on weekends.

-- Use of Klug Road by Amon and Sons to bring in earth-moving equipment. The machinery would be used to build an access road from the quarry north to County N across Otter Creek, on property owned by Scott Traynor.

-- A bonded reclamation plan from Amon to replace topsoil at the quarry site and restore the parcel for agricultural use.

-- No disturbing or filling of adjacent marsh areas. The areas must be protected by silt fences or dirt berms.

-- A speed restriction on the quarry access road to limit dust.

Amon had offered changes last month in an earlier quarry plan, which he says address public concerns over traffic and environmental impact of the proposed quarry.

As of Tuesday, the town clerk's office did not have on file any updated site drawings or plans showing the proposed changes. Yet on Tuesday evening, members of the town board and the planning and zoning committee had a full array of new site plans from Amon and Sons, which officials used as reference materials in discussions Tuesday.

When asked by The Gazette why those plans had not been made available to the public prior to the meeting, town Chairman Bryan Meyer said that Amon and Sons had mailed them directly to town officials on Monday.

Meyer said that the documents would be filed for public review soon, and he noted that the public already had been made aware of changes the town was seeking to the quarry plan.

"It was discussed in open public (at a hearing on May 14). The changes to those drawings were asked to be changed, and the changes are consistent with what was asked to be changed," Meyer said.

Several members of a grassroots group of residents who live along Klug Road and oppose the quarry were at the meeting Tuesday.

Klug Road resident Linda Schalk, spokeswoman for a neighbors group, said Tuesday that if the town board approves the quarry plan, the group will mount a legal fight, although she wouldn't specify when the group could file a lawsuit.

"We hired an attorney (Matthew Fleming of Madison) to protect the land, and we intend to do it," Schalk said.

The town's comprehensive plan shows the quarry area is environmentally sensitive. The town's zoning map had a wetland conservancy zoning overlay that blanketed the proposed quarry area and barred development of gravel quarries through its zoning rules.

The town board threw out the overlay in April, saying the land in question, a hillside, had the wrong grade and soil type to be considered a wetland.

If it gains town approval, the quarry would still need state and Rock County approval. State floodplains and county shoreland zoned areas blanket parts of the proposed quarry operation and Otter Creek, where Amon plans a quarry access road and a bridge.

Colin Byrnes, who handles zoning enforcement in Rock County, said the quarry plan would require approval from at least one if not multiple county committees for parts of the plan that deal with quarry traffic, access to County N and zoning.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(4)
snowman
May 24, 2012 at 8:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

wheres the hills around Lima Marsh? wheres the hills around Horicon Marsh?? thats right no hills in sight but its still a wetland/marsh in both those areas.......Birdman go to bed. the Milton Town Board should approve this pit. You guys/gals are right on on this one.

snowman
May 24, 2012 at 8:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

Linda grow up!!

birdman
May 23, 2012 at 9:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

A hillside is not a low area, as is a marsh. Yep, we all understand that. None of us needed the Town of Milton Board to tell us that.
. . . .
And it comes as no surprise, perhaps, that the hillside “...had the wrong grade and soil type to be considered a wetland.” Well DUH, its elevation is higher than the marsh. We all get that, too.
. . . .
But. Apparently the Milton Town Board does not remember the crucial fact that water runs down hill: seeks its own level.
. . . .
Rainfall and snow meltwater WILL run down that hill. To the marshy area. Rain and snow meltwater will be absorbed by the ground of that hillside and WILL percolate downward to the water table. [Please remember that this is a GLACIAL hill . . lots of gravel and sand!] Some of that water will remain underground, and of course some will become part of the surface water. Water of the marsh.
. . . .
So, the Deciders on the Milton Town Board think that the hillside is NOT integral to the wetland, the wetland’s unique structure, or the wetland’s life forms which depend on that biome.
. . . .
Am I the only concerned citizen who understands how misguided the Board was when it threw out the overlay? Incredible! Terribly misguided!

riverrat006
May 23, 2012 at 6:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

Seems like the " Chair and Traynor" have struck a deal. What is it when the board has the info but not the clerk and is not available to the public

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT