Seemingly endless Wis. election cycle eases to end

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Thursday, Nov. 8, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Election 2012




Click here for all of the election results with stories, galleries, podcasts and more.

— Candidates approving this message have been at it for two years in Wisconsin, along with the robocalls, angry commercials, emails begging for campaign donations and glossy political mail.

Think you had it bad over the last few months? Don’t complain to Wisconsin voters, who have endured a continuous stream of elections, recalls and recounts since 2010, including one statewide election each month between April and June.

With Tuesday’s presidential and congressional races finally over in this battleground state, residents are settling in to a campaign respite.

Some said they’re answering their phones again. Local advertisers have access to the prime television spots that had been monopolized by wealthy buyers of campaign and issue ads. Campaign volunteers suddenly have free time.

“I’m going to catch up on all the reading I’ve been putting off for a year,” said 77-year-old Luonne Dumak, who estimates she spent eight to 20 hours per week volunteering at a GOP headquarters in southeastern Wisconsin for the last two years, including helping Republican Gov. Scott Walker beat back a recall effort.

“But you know,” the retired office worker added, “in the spring there’s another state Supreme Court race.”

Many local voters probably don’t want to hear that.

The action started in 2010, when Walker defeated Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett in a governor’s race that cost $37.4 million, a record at the time. Walker moved swiftly to curtail collective bargaining rights for most public employees, sparking massive protests and prompting 14 Democratic state senators to flee the state in a futile attempt to block the plan.

Democrats then gathered enough signatures to force several Republican officeholders, including Walker, into recall elections as payback. Republicans responded by doing the same to a few Democrats.

But since the governor couldn’t face a recall until he’d been in office for at least a year, Democrats in the meantime transformed an otherwise quiet Wisconsin Supreme Court election into a heated referendum on Walker.

A few months later, in the summer of 2011, nine state senators from across the state faced recall elections stemming from their positions on the labor law. Democrats defended their three incumbents and also took two of six seats from Republicans.

Five more elections arrived in rapid succession this year. Then a Republican presidential primary in April was followed by a Democratic primary in May to decide who would challenge Walker in the June recall election.

In August, four Republicans squared off in a bruising primary for the U.S. Senate. It came to an end Tuesday, with the deciding of the presidential and U.S. Senate elections that had attracted national attention and money to the state.

Margaret Grace, a junior and member of Marquette University’s College Democrats, spent two years helping with one hectic Wisconsin campaign after another. After working so long to organize volunteers, make phone calls and knock on doors, she said it felt weird to have all the elections come to an abrupt end.

“It’s certainly different. We were saying, ‘What are we going to do now that we don’t have a campaign to work on?’” she said.

Her group says it’s considering partnering with environmental or women’s rights groups on campus.

All those Wisconsin elections meant plenty of campaign spending: $81 million in the Walker recall race, about $65 million for the U.S. Senate race and $44 million for the state Senate recalls last year. A lot of that money went to TV stations in battleground areas such as Brown County.

Stations have to give legally qualified candidates their best ad rates. But issue groups, who are often well-funded and eager to spend, can be charged anything, said Steve Lavin, the station manager at WBAY-TV in Green Bay. Where a regular advertiser might be charged $2,000 for a prime-time spot, an issue group could be charged $20,000 to $30,000, he said.

That left some reliable advertisers scrambling for preferred spots. David Gruber, a personal injury attorney, is well-known throughout the state for his catchy commercials. But with fewer favorable time slots to choose from, he said his office compensated with billboards and website ads.

So many elections in such a short time could have caused Wisconsin voters to burn out. But the opposite was true. While voter turnout nationally was lower Tuesday than it was in 2008, the number of Wisconsin voters who turned out increased by about 80,000.

Still, the elections took a toll on some people.

Rita Pincsak, 63, of Brookfield said political divisions caused her to break off friendships with people whose views weren’t compatible with hers. And James Stanhope, 60, of St. Francis said he stopped answering his phone for the past two months to avoid robocalls.

“I’ve gotten sick and tired of it,” said Stanhope, adding that the endless TV commercials were intolerable. “I mean, when you know ads by heart and they start playing in your head, you’ve had too much.”

Associated Press writer Carrie Antlfinger contributed to this report.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(15)
Maine2010
Nov 9, 2012 at 1:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

Governor praises pension reform bill by T. Herdt, Aug. 31, 2012
Sacramento - On overwhelming bipartisan votes, lawmakers on Friday sent to Gov. Jerry Brown a comprehensive reform of public pensions in California that is designed to end abuses such as spiking, prevent high-wage earners from accumulating $100,000 pensions and save state and local governments about $50 billion over the next 30 years. "Pensions were not made to be a way to make people wealthy, but to ensure security at retirement age," said Sen. Gloria Negrette McLeod, D-Chino. The bill, AB 340, caps the amount of compensation subject to pension calculations at $110,000, increases retirement ages, and lowers pension formulas for state and local government workers hired after Jan. 1. It also requires all public workers, new and current, to pay at least half the annual contributions that are made into their pension funds. It also seeks to end so-called pension "spiking" by requiring that pensions be calculated on the average compensation earned during an employee's final three years and prohibiting the use of cashed-in vacation time, bonuses and other non-recurring pay in calculating pension benefits.
The bill, which Gov. Jerry Brown is expected to sign, also bars the practice known as "double-dipping," by requiring that retired government employees stay off the payroll for at least six months before being allowed to come back as part-time workers. Brown praised the Legislature's action, calling the bill "the biggest rollback of public pensions in California history. This sweeping pension reform package will save tens of billions of taxpayer dollars and make the system more sustainable for the long term." An analysis by the California Public Employees Retirement System estimates the changes will save state and local governments from $42 billion to $55 billion over the next three decades. Most of the savings would come when those hired beginning next year start to retire, but more immediate savings will be realized as local governments negotiate higher employee contributions to their pensions. The bill says the contributions must be split 50-50 between employers and employees by 2015. If that level isn't reached through collective bargaining by then, the bill would give local governments the ability to achieve that level by declaring a bargaining impasse. Nearly all state government workers already pay half.

wislady
Nov 9, 2012 at 10:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

Forward....legislative session!

vnvet7071
Nov 9, 2012 at 9:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

Doesn't matter, he won and Mitt lost.

wislady
Nov 9, 2012 at 7:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

Which 20 counties in Wisconsin did Obama lose that he carried in the last election?

wislady
Nov 8, 2012 at 6:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

"I hate to break the news wislady, but the next election cycle for Dems and Repubs starts the day after the election."

Most of us know that.

wislady
Nov 8, 2012 at 6:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

westerbust

I was referring to the next specific battle, not generalities.

westorbust
Nov 8, 2012 at 3:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

I hate to break the news wislady, but the next election cycle for Dems and Repubs starts the day after the election. It has nothing to do with liberals or conservatives. As long as campaigns are about raising cash to buy advertising, and the conservatives on the Supreme Court have decided that speech is money, then you have to play the game. Of course you could have voted for Gary Johnson...but I'm sure you didn't.

janesvillean
Nov 8, 2012 at 3:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

Yes, I remember when those liberals "dropped the bomb" and spoke to a wealthy supporter that they would "divide and conquer". Those darn liberals and their secret plans!

wislady
Nov 8, 2012 at 2:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

Get used to it, the liberals have already begun the next saga.

sheeck1281
Nov 8, 2012 at 2:19 p.m.
Suggest removal

I used to watch the early morning news between 5:00 AM & 7:00 AM but since all the TV ads for candidates I quit watching. Didn't even turn on TV! Thank goodness now I can watch again!!

Maynard
Nov 8, 2012 at 10:06 a.m.
Suggest removal

Sadly I believe that by today, 435 House members and 33 Senators are or have their staff making phone calls soliciting money for 2014. One of the reasons you see the House and Senate chambers so empty most days when you watch that channel. They have to go across the street to make the calls legally. Not allowed to do so from the Capitol building. One more reason to extend the House terms to 6 years and term limits but will never happen ... Constitutional Admendment required which requires Congress to approve it first and they will not fire themselves. The House might support the 6 year term idea but not the term limits.

carlitosway
Nov 8, 2012 at 8:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

By the back of her shirt her candidate did not do well... *OBAMA* FOUR MORE YEARS

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT