Caution ahead: State might push to boost transportation taxes
Get ready for a late-winter or spring public relations blitz to try and convince you to pay more to maintain Wisconsin transportation systems, including local roads and aging miles of Interstate.
A coalition of transportation groups has already focus-group tested this question:
How much does the average vehicle owner, driving between 12,000 and 15,000 miles per year, pay in a year to use Wisconsin highways and bridges? Guesses ranged from $500 to $1,000 per year.
The answer is $200 to $300 per year—making current transportation taxes and fees a bargain, according to a special Wisconsin Department of Transportation commission that will be recommending ways to close the looming funding shortfall.
That means Wisconsin drivers pay less in a year to use Wisconsin’s highways than they pay for cable TV or Internet service, Martin Hanson, an engineer and member of the Transportation Finance & Policy Commission, told a Transportation Development Association (TDA) seminar.
“That’s going to be an important message,” Hanson said. “It’s not clear what kind of value (drivers) are getting for their gas tax and registration fee payments.”
Hanson offered another example of how it’s a bargain to own and drive a vehicle here: Wisconsin’s gas tax is now a smaller percentage of the retail price of gas than it was in 1929.
Numbers on which that claim is based:
--Wisconsin’s gas tax was 2 cents per gallon in 1929, according to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, and gas was then selling for about 21 cents per gallon. Now, Wisconsin’s gas tax is 30.9 cents per gallon, and Wisconsin AAA reported that regular gas was selling for a statewide average of about $3.41 last week.
--Wisconsin gets 85 percent of its transportation cash from only two sources—the 30.9-cent-per-gallon gas tax, last increased in April 2006, and the $75-per-vehicle annual registration fee, unchanged since January 2008.
-- State transportation taxes, fees and transfers will total $1.9 billion this year, and federal aid will add about $847 million.
Wisconsin Department of Transportation officials, transportation-group advocates and some legislators agree on what’s at stake: If more transportation cash isn’t forthcoming, major highways will not be rebuilt, pavement will wear out quicker than it can be maintained, and traffic congestion will worsen.
In January, the Finance & Policy Commission will make recommendations to Gov. Scott Walker, who can follow them or come up with his own ideas when he gives lawmakers his proposed 2013-15 budget early next year. Two years ago, Walker proposed using sales tax money to help cover the transportation funding gap.
Finance & Policy Commission estimates of projected 10-year funding shortfalls are huge—between $3.3 billion, which would not even maintain highways and bridges at current levels, and $18.4 billion.
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, a Republican, has estimated the 10-year shortfall at about $4 billion. But Craig Thompson, executive director of the TDA coalition, puts the gap at about $6 billion.
Hanson and Thompson, who is also a member of the study panel, said the panel considered dozens of ways to make drivers pay more.
Those still being seriously considered include:
--Increasing the 30.9-cent-per-gallon gas tax, which is all but certain to be recommended. The tax is already in place and would not cost more to administer, so raising it “only makes sense,” Hanson told the TDA.
--Raising the $75 annual vehicle registration fee. A $10-per-vehicle increase would bring in $45 million more each year.
--Collecting a new miles-driven fee, although Wisconsin would be the first state to do so. It could work this way: When you get your annual vehicle registration notice, you would report the odometer reading and pay a per-mile fee based on the number of miles driven. There could be a 3,000-mile exemption and a cap of 15,000 miles.
But it would take years to phase in a mileage-based fee, so it is not an option for the next state budget, Thompson added.
--Eliminating the sales tax exemption for trade-in vehicles, which would be unpopular but net $900 million more over 10 years.
--Creating regional transportation authorities with new taxing powers.
Because tolls could only be charged on new Interstate lanes and would require federal government approval, they are not a serious option, Thompson added.
Steven Walters is a senior producer for the nonprofit public affairs channel WisconsinEye. This column reflects his personal perspective. Email stevenscwalters@gmail.com.

Nov 19, 2012 at 10:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
You know you're argument is failed when you try to comapre the "fixed" tax per gallon compared to the retail price. If the fuel use tax was only used for roads, as it was orginally intended, there wouldn't be much of a problem.
Nov 19, 2012 at 9:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Motorman.....short term gain given priority over long term loss. That's the easiest explanation for their decision. I can't speak for MN, but growing up in Illinois, everyone was well aware of how screwed up the state(Chicago) government is. $80 billion in unfunded pension obligations is a give away to how completely inept that state is when it comes to finances and financial planning.......
Nov 19, 2012 at 9:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Surely Scott Walker will not raise taxes?!?!?!?
Nov 19, 2012 at 9:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Motorman......considering the "high speed" train would have saddled Wisconsin taxpayers in the neighborhood of $6 million in operating/maintenance expenses every year it was carrying passengers between madison and milwaukee, I would say, yes, your statement is accurate......
Nov 19, 2012 at 8:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
My wife and I pay considerably more than $300 a year to drive on public roads, but then again, we drive considerably more than 15,000 miles a year.
Would I rather have cheaper gas than more expensive gas? Sure, but what really hurts are the $1000 trips to the mechanic because we couldn't safely dodge a massive pothole.
The gas tax going up 10-20 cents a gallon isn't going to make or break anyone. Big Oil constantly jacks prices around that much, or 10 times that much, and yet people still drive. At least a gas tax hike is going to projects making travel safer and smoother, instead of going to already obscenely profitable oil companies.
As I mentioned in another thread, Michigan's highway funding is in such straits that county highways are being converted back to gravel; the local road commission simply can't afford to fix the road. Drivers there might save a buck or two on a fillup, but it'll go right back to their mechanic in the spring.
Nov 19, 2012 at 7:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
"And do we really need to have 5 guys standing around watching the 6th one work?"
You are exaggerating....driving on Hwy 26 this morning, I only saw 4 guys holding up one shovel.
Nov 19, 2012 at 12:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
Why don't we just slash the pay of construction workers? They probably don't' need pensions or healthcare either. And do we really need to have 5 guys standing around watching the 6th one work?
Nov 19, 2012 at 11:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
baegucb......These recommendations are coming from the Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation. Aside from the recommendations involving tax increases--of which I consider the gasoline tax bump to be the most viable--how would you propose we maintain our roads and bridges without a tax increase?? I'm anxious to hear your recommendations!
Nov 19, 2012 at 9:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
Has the State paid back all the gas tax that Jim Doyle stole to cover the Democrats general fund mismanagement?
Nov 19, 2012 at 9:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
I can't wait to hear what the democrats propose.
Nov 19, 2012 at 8:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Democrats: Setting up bogus programs to tax all of us to death.
Nov 19, 2012 at 8:02 a.m.
Suggest removal
Republicans: the tax and spend party.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.