Con: Like FDR before him, Obama has saved capitalism by harnessing its excesses
WASHINGTON EDITOR’S NOTE: The writer is addressing the question, “Is President Obama thwarting economic growth?”
The canard that President Obama is anti-business is a propaganda remnant from Mitt Romney’s failed presidential campaign.
Obama, after all, was the president who bailed out Wall Street with the Troubled Asset Relief Program. TARP and other Obama corporate rescue programs, after all, benefited such goliath corporations as Bank of America, Citigroup, AIG, General Motors and Chrysler—saving tens of thousands of jobs.
Romney, who wanted the Detroit automakers to go bankrupt, represents the predatory form of capitalism that swarms all over dead or dying corporations to pick their assets clean by selling them off with huge profits going to the vulture-like middlemen.
Had the former Massachusetts governor won the presidential election, General Motors and Chrysler likely would have been diced and sliced with their valuable assets put in the hands of Chinese, Russian, Japanese and European conglomerates courtesy of financial corpse-preparing morticians such as Bain Capital.
Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the economic stimulus package of 2009, provided direct and indirect assistance to small and large businesses through the hiring of construction companies and related companies to rebuild roads, highways, rail lines, airports and telecommunications infrastructure.
A “Buy American” clause prevented notorious foreign outsourcers from bypassing American workers and manufacturers by seeking out the lowest wage earners and cheapest products abroad.
As the dreaded Jan. 1 “financial cliff” approaches, President Obama is proposing a return to Clinton administration tax rates, which imposed a top rate of 39.6 percent on for those earning more than $250,000 a year.
That’s only a slight bump up from the 35 percent rate put in place by the Bush tax cuts, and together with mandatory cuts and proposed tax increases of about $600 billion, assure a soft landing for America’s recovering economy.
The Republicans and their wealthy backers have cried foul, ignoring the fact that the Clinton tax rates also saw a booming economy, especially with regard to the practically overnight successful “dot com” start-ups, healthy government surpluses and 21 million new jobs.
Unfazed by Romney’s drubbing in the polls and the failure of Republicans to make gains in Congress, America’s wealthiest tycoons have mounted a propaganda effort aimed at convincing all of America that Obama is intent on thwarting America’s growth.
Arch-conservative organizations such as the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Club for Growth and American Legislative Exchange Council are seeing public support erode for tax-breaks for the rich, cuts in Social Security and Medicare, and slashing of public education, infrastructure improvement, and crucial new research and development projects.
It’s becoming increasingly clear that President Obama may be on the verge of forging a new can-do coalition of Democrats and moderately conservative Republicans that would jump-start economic growth by restoring Clinton-era tax rates while saving the vital health and social services programs popular with most Americans. No wonder that the Koch brothers and their ilk are in a state of near panic.
There is little doubt that if the United States was preparing to inaugurate Mitt Romney as president on Jan. 20, 2013, the world would be talking about America’s disastrous drift into the austerity budgets now forced on such European basket-cases as Spain and Greece.
The president’s election mandate to bring about a public-private partnership economic growth plan will soon be the envy of Europe, but only if the administration resists efforts to place Social Security, Medicare, and public education on the chopping block.
Like FDR in the 1930s, Obama actually is saving American capitalism by reining in it excesses and plowing under its inequities.
Today’s malefactors’ of great wealth already have launched an industrial strength propaganda campaign to discredit Obama’s recipe for economic growth.
The media should combat this insidious assault on common sense by remembering the mission Chicago journalist Finley Peter Dunne urged on newspapers at the turn of the last century: “Comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.”
Wayne Madsen is a contributing writer to www.onlinejournal.com. Readers may write to him at National Press Club front desk, 529 14th Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20045.

Dec 1, 2012 at 1 p.m.
Suggest removal
This article is a collection of democrat talking points most of which wilt in the light of reality.
For instance, the 'Bain Capitals' have a place in the market because of laws that are in place. If they are violating the law, arrest them. What enterprises like Bain do however is restructure companies that are on their way to failure. Often they save as many jobs as are lost. While anecdotal evidence is presented in the form of individuals who lost their job seldom is the fact presented that as many jobs were saved that eventually would have been lost.
Then there is this thing about General Motors going bankrupt. Quote "General Motors and Chrysler likely would have been diced and sliced with their valuable assets put in the hands of Chinese, Russian, Japanese and European conglomerates..." End Quote
This of course is pure speculation and assumes that their are no rich people in the USA ready to invest. (And there may not be by the time President Obama is finished.)
As someone mentioned earlier, Ford survived by restructuring, why couldn't GM?
Dec 1, 2012 at 12:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
dtb, most of the points made in this article are exactly why the economy is still in a mess and going backwards. Example: GM bailout? unions not stock holders - they could have restructured like Ford. Banks? all Big Obama donors, still enjoying lucrative bonuses. Vulture-like Bain? Lost some companies, but saved so many more from going under.
Pres. Obama's bigging problem that isn't going away anytime soon is his lavish spending habits. He's playing King and we will pay the price. It's just a matter of time at this point. Because the Governorment last year received more revenue in American history. Revenue is not the problem due to glorious Capitalism. Spending is the problem more in a socialist fashion.
The headline should read:
Capitalism saved Obama's re-election.
Dec 1, 2012 at 12:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
I thought I had heard everything. Every spin the left had, but this is a clear indication Liberals and Democrats did not win this election. Obama and only Obama, probably due to his race won this election. I'm not saying that is a bad thing, to win that way, if his policies weren't hurting so many people. What is bad is the continued insults on the American intelligence.
Perhaps this writer is overlooking or unaware, or just plain hiding the truth like most media these days that President Obama is planning on asking for MORE stimlus to "bail out" companies hardest hit by HIS tax increases.
Some may simply say that is a refund most of us enjoy at tax return time. But look at the list of companies. All huge Obama donors. If this were a Republican, heads would be rolling.
Dec 1, 2012 at 12:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yeah, obamacare helps business....lol
Nov 30, 2012 at 10:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
Obama has saved capitalism
That is so absurd it is funny. That should be in the joke of the day section.
Nov 30, 2012 at 6:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
Here's one for you dtb....go ahead and raise taxes on those earning over $200,000 a year and that will pay for the govt for a whole 8 days!! Yippee...problem solved right? Obama wants higher taxes now but no spending cuts until 2014. That's too late. And now he's running around the country campaigning again! Get back to DC and DO YOUR JOB...LEAD FOR ONCE! Think of the cost of flying Air Force One and staff, etc around the country...could pay for the govt at least one day. And he has announced his plans for going to Hawaii for yet another vacation...Nero fiddles while Rome burns.
Also the partial statement about Romney wanting Detroit to go bankrupt is such a biased comment it doesn't deserve a response. Look the whole comment and plan and read it.
Nov 29, 2012 at 2:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
This one should have the righties seething.
usaret didn't seem to be able to dispute any of the points made.
Nov 29, 2012 at 2:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
Reading this I can see that is just another fluff piece in praise of the great and glorious leader known as OBAMA.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.