Inventory assesses Janesville site needs
If you go
What: (Re)building a healthy Janesville open house for residents to give input on cleaning polluted areas and blighted buildings to improve the health of Janesville residents.
When: 6 to 8 p.m. Tuesday.
Where: City council chambers in City Hall, 18 N. Jackson St.
RSVP: Terry Nolan, city of Janesville, 608-755-3095, nolant@ci.janesville.wi.us.
To learn more: Visit the city’s brownfields redevelopment project website at ci.janesville.wi.us/redevelopment.
JANESVILLE What parts of Janesville are most in need of makeovers, blight removal, contamination clean-up or redevelopment?
City staff, the Janesville Downtown Revitalization Committee and city residents have been working to make an inventory of those sites since the city received a $400,000 federal assessment grant.
The money was used to hire a consultant to help. Such studies are required to apply for other grants, said Al Hulick, management analyst for the city.
“Without knowing the information up front, there is no funding source available,” Hulick said.
The 12 areas identified as needing the most help are:
-- The North Main Street corridor in the area of Adams & Sons Roofing.
-- The site of a former gasification plant on the east side of Main Street north Traxler Park. The site, owned by Alliant Energy, is heavily contaminated. Its location near Traxler Park makes it attractive to the city.
-- The property just north of City Hall and the police station.
-- The former Accudyne property on North Franklin Street.
-- River Street near Central Vending, just north of Ace Hardware.
-- The block on the corner of Court and River streets, near Enginaire.
-- The Plaza Furniture building at 55 S. River St.
-- The block around Chase Bank, 11 W. Milwaukee St. The bank uses only about one-quarter of the building, which would be good for redevelopment.
-- General Motors and the former JATCO property.
-- The area around Marling Lumber, 634 S. River St.
-- The area around the Schlueter Co., 112 E. Centerway, across from Adams & Sons Roofing. Janesville’s various downtown plans call for the building to be redeveloped.
-- The area around the former Robinson’s Cleaners, now Aramark, 310 W. Centerway.
At an open house, residents told city staff they generally want the areas economically developed and put back on the tax rolls.
Plaza Furniture, 55 S. River St., is the first property to be purchased under the new initiative.
In the past, the city took an incremental approach to brownfield identification and remediation, Hulick said. Properties often were simply purchased when they became available.
That was a bad approach and opened the city to liability if environmental contaminants were found and the city didn’t do its due diligence, Hulick said.
In addition, the city now knows where to focus its resources.
The property at 55 S. River St., for instance, was a gas station in the 1950s. The city will buy the property for $290,000 plus closing costs contingent on an environmental study.
The city has earned a local government liability exemption because it will do the groundwork before it purchases the building, he said.
Hulick said it is important to look at entire areas to redevelop successfully.
For instance, Adams Roofing is in a floodplain, so any redevelopment effort must include the surrounding area, as well.
The Aramark property by itself is too narrow, and access is terrible.
“We’re never going to solve the GM problem through this grant … we’re not going to be able to solve the Monterey (Hotel) … But we need to start making some progress, to bring some things from plans into reality,” Hulick said.
“We’re trying to get people excited,” he said.
The city will host more meetings on the topic with residents in the future, Hulick said.
Comments sought on health issues
The city of Janesville and the Rock County Health Department are spearheading a program geared to protecting public health and the environment by removing blight and cleaning up brownfield sites.
Brownfield sites are properties that are contaminated or have the potential to be contaminated with hazardous substances because of past or current uses.
The health department received $148,433 from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
The goal is to reduce exposure to contaminants and improve health as the city continues redevelopment work, said Terry Nolan, associate planner for the city.
An open house is planned for residents Tuesday.
“It’s really about making sure community health is part of that planning. We want them (residents) to tell us, basically, what issues in the community are impacting their health,” Nolan said.
That includes not only blighted buildings and lead contamination but also whether the city has enough bike trails and recreation opportunities, affordable housing, entertainment venues and public art, for instance, Nolan said.
Nolan considers those “quality of life” issues.
During the open house, residents can view redevelopment plans and vote on their favorites.
“The success of our efforts will not only be measured in the number of brownfield sites identified and assessed but also in how the city can address environmental and social injustices that may be related to brownfield sites in our community,” Nolan said.
Some health issues that can be related to brownfield redevelopment include:
-- Lead poisoning in children who live in older housing.
-- Poor physical fitness because of limited opportunities for recreation within walking distance.
-- Exposure to toxic chemicals from old industrial sites.
Redevelopment actions to address the issues might include:
-- Adding affordable downtown housing.
-- Adding sidewalks to make neighborhoods more walkable.
-- Creating access points to the Rock River and adding parks downtown.
-- Improving Rock River water quality.
-- Fixing and reusing rundown properties.


Oct 8, 2012 at 10:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
gimme a free Obama phone!
Oct 8, 2012 at 10:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Poor physical fitness because of limited opportunities for recreation within walking distance."
...
My parents were afraid to walk around the block, which they did when their children visited, because dogs ran loose. Folks, don't you realize that letting dogs run loose can cause falls and broken hips? It's not a libertarian issue!
Oct 7, 2012 at 1:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
janesvillean....landscaping! You've got to be kidding!
Oct 7, 2012 at 3:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Assessed value, as you note, is not the same thing as market value. I think it's clear the city was interested in controlling this strategic property, and it could be as simple as the owners holding out for more -- because for less than that price, well, they could keep it vacant for X more years and write off the losses. The city would like to have options as it demolishes the parking plaza, and that could be as simple as putting some of that parking where the furniture store was. I doubt the paint color matters (although what a finger in the eye of Janesville that was -- thanks guys) as the structure is probably not long for this world.
.
befair, there are some decrepit looking structures out that way, but most are actually occupied by functioning businesses, however downscale. Some landscaping would probably help....
.
Sigma40, you do realize that the point of hiring a consultant is to get a DISINTERESTED opinion by an EXPERT unaffiliated with the outcome? As noted, if you want to go out and get the grants, you need a study to show that the grants are justified. The world works this way only to frustrate Sigma40, I know.
Oct 6, 2012 at 10:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Wait a minute! Why is the city paying $290,000 for 55 S. River, nearly $60,000 more than it has been assessed for? (http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us:8000/WebU...)
I know, I know, many properties sell for more than they are assessed at, but this is a property that most recently has had a failed business occupy it (Siker's/Plaza) and has been on the market unsold for some time since then. Surely this building shouldn't be selling for a premium price, especially when it's been painted that lovely green color, should it? I admit that I may have missed something in previous articles, but can someone clarify?
Oct 6, 2012 at 10:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
How did they happen to miss the southern gateway into Janesville on Highway 51/Center Ave.? There are some excellent targets for improvement out there.
Oct 6, 2012 at 7:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Why dont we have anyone working for the city already that can do the consulting? Do we have a bunch of no-brainers working here? Oh wait... already know that answer.
Oct 6, 2012 at 5:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
So far only the paid consultants have been 'excited' - not a very good start at all.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.