Schools taking stock in standards
When teachers and school administrators talk about common core standards, they tend to use phrases such as "literacy in all subjects" and "coherence in curriculum."
As a result, parents and community members tend to tune out, assuming the standards are just another academic fad.
But the standards are part of a national movement designed to intensify academic rigor, create a consistent curriculum across state borders and, most important, prepare students for a world that requires more than the ability to recite facts.
Not that there's anything wrong with facts. It's just that knowledge is better.
Changing times
At the turn of the 20th century, education was about rote learning. Students were supposed to recite the capitals of the states and countries, run through the multiplication tables and recite bits of poetry and prose.
It was a one-size-fits-all type of learning, and it matched the spirit of the age.
As Clinton Superintendent Don Childs put it, "Henry Ford didn't just invent the automobile; he invented the assembly line."
American schooling has evolved, but somewhere along the way American students fell behind their peers in other countries, some say.
Childs pointed out that in the 1950's, America had one of the longest school days and one of the longest school years in the world.
Even more significant, the curriculum became more diffuse.
Childs, using math as an example, described it this way: "The American math curriculum is a mile wide and an inch deep."
"In the typical eighth-grade Japanese curriculum, they work on an average of 17 new math topics in a 220-day school year," he said.
American students might be introduced to fractions for two to three weeks and then, after mastering the mechanics, move on to the dozens of other math topics they need to cover.
Under the new standards, students will have to master the mechanics and then explain the "why" of the mechanics. Why do you flip a faction in division?
That kind of thorough learning is generally reserved for gifted and talented students. Now, however, all students will be challenged.
That information learned beyond the basic mechanics will serve students, "not for the next 40 minutes, but the next 40 days and the next 40 years," Childs said.
Why the change?
Here's a fact: Madison is the capital of Wisconsin.
Here's some knowledge: Did you know that Madison's founder, James Doty, owned a significant amount of land on the isthmus of what is now Madison?
During the state's first legislative session in Belmont, Doty lobbied legislators to put the new capital on his isthmus—even though the city only existed as a surveyor's plan on paper.
Back then, territorial Gov. Henry Dodge wanted Belmont, the center of lead mining, to remain the capital.
According to some historians, Doty offered legislators good deals on land in his city with the tacit understanding they would opt for Madison as the capital.
Students have always memorized the state capitals. Will they do so under the new standards?
"Students might memorize the state capitals, but it would incidental to the learning," Childs said.
Here's what has changed: Simple facts are now available at everyone's fingertips. You can find out what the capital of Wisconsin is in an instant.
Memorizing the state capitals is a good exercise. Knowing how geography, industry, culture and money influenced the choice of capitals is an exercise in intensive learning that will help students throughout their lives.
Here's another example from the field of math: A television pundit announces that 89 percent of those polled agree with him on his favorite topic. What does that mean?
Eighty-nine percent of whom? People who watch his or her show? How many people responded to the poll? Five or 50?
Anyone can calculate percentages. Understanding how they work requires a flexible mind.
The details
Districts have already started moving toward common core standards.
In the Delavan-Darien School District, high school students all are engaged in "Authentic Intellectual Achievement," in which students are taught using methods usually reserved for gifted and talented students. There's more focus on non-fiction reading and writing, and students are required to show their knowledge by communicating it to others.
The Janesville School District has altered its report cards, going from letter grades A-F to number grades 1-4.
A score of 1 indicates the student has a partial understand of the subject, and 2 means the student has mastery of the simple mechanics of what he or she is learning. Three reflects a complete mastery of the mechanics or information and some of its complexities. Finally, 4 means the student has an in-depth understanding of the subject that "goes beyond the learning goals."
A grade of 4 is the goal of common core standards.
Childs believes students will respond to work that is more rigorous as long as it is engaging and relevant.
"We've got to get students more deeply involved in their learning," he said.

Sep 6, 2012 at 12:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
I think teachers should have 10 years of experience in the field doing something other than teaching before they are allowed to teach. Most my younger teachers I had did nothing more than relay info from a text book to the class. A couple of teachers that were older and I thought were better had real life experiences to relate their teachings too.
Sep 5, 2012 at 2:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
There is nothing wrong with our school system that cannot be fixed by firing all of the teachers, burning all of the textbooks, and starting over from scratch with people who actually know something about the subject matter. When Tommy Thompson tried to rewrite the state educational standards, I was struck by the fact that no one on the science/math curriculum committee had any background in actually USING math and science! The "science" of Bill Nye is a "ginned-up" science of demonstration experiments developed to bedazzle and amaze paying customers to provide a livelihood for scientists like Michael Faraday to pursue their actual work. Consequently schools teach a "science" incapable of distinguishing causal relationships from mere coincidence.
The problem with the curriculum originates with its foundation, in its distinguishing the "mechanical arts" - the education of the slaves - from the "liberal arts" - the education of the slave owners, resulting in a fundamental lack of relevance in subject matter that was badly mishandled by the attempted reforms of John Dewey.
Sep 5, 2012 at 12:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
Its human nature to fear change. Students get taught what we learned even though its dated material not pertinent to this day and age...Because, no one can change the material to match the time period we live in. Im sure there is some material totally irrelevant to anything that was taught 100 years ago that is still taught today...
-
ps. do not try burger kings popcorn chicken. disgusting.
Sep 5, 2012 at noon
Suggest removal
Another thing:
When "high" schools don't even afford the opportunity to learn what a labor union is or how it operates, that is rather pathetic in itself.
The one I went to didn't and was supposed to be so "good"(ha ha, subjective).
Sep 5, 2012 at 11:34 a.m.
Suggest removal
Sigma makes a good point too.
Students aren't learning which way "North" is, or things like basic economics so they don't find themselves broke from bad decisions 30 years later.
Sep 5, 2012 at 11:27 a.m.
Suggest removal
Oops, I guess they do engage in that silliness after seeing the website.
Didn't see any of that on 60 Minutes.
Maybe not so good after all.
Sep 5, 2012 at 11:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
AndrewJackson- .....Exactly........And they don't engage in endless blathering about "creation" or "evolution" which accomplishes exactly nothing like "Bill Nye" the idiot does.
There is no hard, scientific evidence for either one, but some insist on wasting valuable teaching time on this blathering.
Sep 5, 2012 at 10:34 a.m.
Suggest removal
40 minutes, 40 days, 40 years? - Almost sounds Biblical. Are the proposed "changes" real institutional changes or just cosmetic alterations?
Sep 5, 2012 at 9:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Did anyone catch the program on "60 Minutes" about The Kahn Academy. Looks like the direction we should be going. Check out the website.
Sep 5, 2012 at 9:28 a.m.
Suggest removal
Why concentrate on the capitals when most students cant even identify which direction North is? We put the carriage in front of the horse in so many areas. Why teach Shakespear in English classes when I see so many people dont know the difference between common simple words like.. "you're" and "your". We have no emphasis on anything, everything is treated as equally important to learn.. And we wonder why our country has gone down the toilet?? HA!
Sep 4, 2012 at 10:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'm fine with standards based education - it won't affect they way a lot of teachers teach since they're following best practices already, but do you think it will curb belief in creationism? I'm not up on the science standards.
Sep 4, 2012 at 8:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
We need to follow federal standards for education.
Forty six percent Americans believe in creationism, 32 percent believe in theistic evolution and only 15 percent believe in evolution without any divine intervention.
Tell 'em Bill Nye. Tell them how teaching creation to children is inappropriate!
http://youtu.be/gHbYJfwFgOU
Sep 4, 2012 at 5:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
Don Childs needs a history lesson. Henry Ford did NOT invent the automobile. I'm not sure how that quote even fits into the story, unless CI was trying to draw a connection to the "factory method" of education. And it would be nice to have some quotes from a few other superintendents or other experts in the field.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.