Janesville School Board to consider budget shortfall
On the agenda
The Janesville School Board meets at 6:30 p.m. Tuesday at the Educational Services Center, 527 S. Franklin St. Agenda items include:
-- More discussion on the employee handbook, which would replace work rules and benefits now spelled out in union contracts, starting next school year.
-- Likely a continuation of Thursday's board discussion, when several board members said they wanted to see more options for a new employee health insurance plan.
-- A recommendation by Superintendent Karen Schulte to send five board members to out-of-town conferences or workshops in the coming year.
-- A presentation on the costs of transporting teams to athletic contests.
JANESVILLE The Janesville School District has the money to balance its budget without raising taxes, so the school board could sidestep the fights of previous years over taxes and budget cuts.
The board will consider how to fill its estimated $3.56 million budget gap when it meets Tuesday night.
On the agenda is a discussion about using district reserves—known as the fund balance—to balance the budget.
The board could take action on the budget gap Tuesday, but it could delay action until the end of October.
Some school board members have indicated that the fund balance is the likely budget gap filler. The balance was estimated to be more than $26 million June 30, but it rises and falls throughout the year with the district's cash-flow needs. It has dipped below $10 million on occasion over the past five years.
Board policy dictates that parts of the fund balance be set aside for specific purposes.
The two biggest claimants on that money are a set-aside for cash flow and another set-aside to be used in case the district's self-funded health insurance plan experiences higher-than-expected claims.
District CFO Keith Pennington recently analyzed the policy's effects on the fund balance and found that $3.85 million is not set aside for any other purpose.
Board members had been concerned that they might have to change their policy in order to free enough money to balance the budget, but it appears that won't be the case.
Several school board members have indicated that dipping into the fund balance is the likely budget-balancing scenario, and no board member has suggested anything else, at least so far.
The $3.56 million budget gap is based on the assumption that the board will levy the maximum property tax under the state law that limits school revenues, but that's not as bad as it sounds.
As reported earlier, the maximum tax levy this year is an estimated $1.8 million less than last year's. That's a 5.9 percent decrease. The average school tax bill should go down.
No board member has suggested taxing any less than the max, perhaps because doing so would mean a reduction in state aid and a bigger budget gap.
Also at Tuesday's meeting, the board will receive a preliminary enrollment number from Friday's official headcount. That number affects state aid and taxing capacity.
The higher the enrollment, the better for the budget, unless students arrive in certain schools, at certain grade levels, where class sizes are bumping up against the maximums set by board policy.
If extra teachers and/or aides are needed, that would mean more spending and a bigger budget gap.
"If there's going to be a big deal, that's where the big deal is," Pennington told members of the board's finance committee last week.
The finance committee made no recommendation on fund balance use.


Sep 25, 2012 at 6:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
Not a good answer.
Sep 25, 2012 at 5:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
A combination of wages and contributions on their behalf by the district, yes. Many people's employer pays a portion of their health insurance premium; either way, they earned it through working.
Sep 25, 2012 at 3:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Oops.....dtb
Sep 25, 2012 at 3:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
dbt
Are you saying that is money teachers paid in, out of their wages?
Sep 25, 2012 at 2:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Actually jB, that reserve is the result of teachers' contributions to health care not paid out as benefits. It belongs to the teachers.
Sep 25, 2012 at 7:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
YET ANOTHER JANESVILLE "BORED" that can't make effective decisions and carry out medium-range plans. Why is this "news"? It's more appropriately "way-too-olds" as far as I can see upon searching the topic on the Gazette website.
Why don't you hand this issue over to the infamous SIDEWALK SUBCOMMITTEE - at least you could try to blame them (as our UN-illustrious city council ultimately will) for "not reaching consensus"!
Sep 24, 2012 at 8:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
Over the years, the students are graduating dumber and dumber, consistently - while the teachers get paid more and more, consistently. See a pattern here? The district can help narrow the gap by paying the teachers 22% less money with no effect on the ever-diminishing education that the students are getting.
Sep 24, 2012 at 8:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
Of course the money should come from the district's reserve fund - taxpayer money should never be considered as a 'reserve'.
Sep 24, 2012 at 7:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Problem is that administrators get paid to much and do too little.
Sep 24, 2012 at 7:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
With the amount of money that this district is in the hole and they are considering spending more $$ to send 5 board members to workshops or conferences?!? That is absolutely ridiculous!!!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.