Expanding Medicaid in Wisconsin is wise investment

By LISA PUGH & HELEN MARKS DICKS   Wednesday, Feb. 6, 2013
ADVERTISEMENT
 

It is important to put a face on the decision of whether or not to expand Medicaid in Wisconsin.

Many people think of Medicaid or BadgerCare as programs that provide health care coverage to the poor, but few know that Wisconsin is home to an estimated 170,000 uninsured, many of whom are working adults who do not qualify for Medicaid even though they have little income.

These include people ages 50 to 64 who have lost their jobs or are struggling to find work. They are not yet eligible for Medicare and have paid into the system all their lives. As aging adults, they are facing the onset of health conditions that, if left untreated, will inevitably increase their need for and use of health and long-term care.

Also included in Wisconsin’s group of uninsured are residents with mental health disorders. They make up a quarter of the uninsured population—people with major depression, bipolar disorder or schizophrenia and others with less serious mental health disorders which affect their daily living.

Covering this population will reduce costly emergency room visits and reliance on traumatizing inpatient services. When these individuals access adequate health care supports, their health improves, they work more, and most important, they don’t die prematurely.

While there is a price tag, the savings clearly weigh in Wisconsin’s favor.

In the plus column is the increased federal match—which starts at 100 percent and never covers less than 90 percent of Wisconsin’s costs. Add to that a significant savings to county taxpayers who will see federal reimbursement for services they currently provide to uninsured individuals who gain coverage in the expansion.

Morally we know what happens if we say no to Medicaid expansion. Hard-working taxpayers get sicker and die. Financially, we watch Wisconsin taxpayers pay for supports to people in other states. We watch innovators create new health care jobs in other states while our state’s employers are forced to pay a $2,000 per employee tax. We see uncompensated care costs rise, creating higher premiums for others.

We must solidify our commitment to older Wisconsin adults and residents with disabilities. We urge Wisconsin to take advantage of federal dollars to expand Medicaid because it makes sense both for the health of Wisconsin residents and for the state budget.

Lisa Pugh is public policy coordinator for Disability Rights Wisconsin, 131 W. Wilson St., Suite 700, Madison, WI, 53703; phone 608-267-0214; email lisa.pugh@drwi.org. Helen Marks Dicks is associate director of advocacy-state issues, for AARP Wisconsin, 222 W. Washington Ave, Suite 600, Madison, WI, 53703; 608-286-6337; email hmdicks@aarp.org.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(1)
R1234
Mar 4, 2013 at 12:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

"In the plus column is the increased federal match—which starts at 100 percent and never covers less than 90 percent of Wisconsin’s costs. Add to that a significant savings to county taxpayers who will see federal reimbursement for services they currently provide to uninsured individuals who gain coverage in the expansion."

Did you take into consideration that the money the Feds will match comes from us, the taxpayer? Either way, the taxpayer pays. I wouldn't call it an investment. However, those who can't pay should have the ability to get medical care. It would be wonderful if all citizens of the US could be covered but money is in short supply these days. If we had a full workforce and people were working, perhaps the problem would resolve itself. It wasn't such a big problem before our manufacturing base disappeared from our shores. What is needed would be jobs that pay a living wage, I suspect, but they are not coming. It is a sad state of affairs but those who are paying taxes are stretched to the limit. I often wonder why we send so much money to Washington, DC. If the money was kept locally, bypassing all the salaries we pay to and for the Federal money laundering machine, wouldn't we have more money for our cities and states to use without the cut that Washington takes?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT