McCabe: Political system shows 'money matters more than people'

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Tuesday, March 5, 2013
ADVERTISEMENT
 

More online


The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign is circulating a petition to pressure state legislators into authorizing a statewide advisory referendum in support of a constitutional amendment to overturn the Citizens United decision.

To read about the petition drive, visit the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign's website.

Photo

Mike McCabe

— Wisconsin was already seeing an unprecedented escalation of campaign contributions before the U.S. Supreme Court issued its Citizens United opinion in 2010.

But after Citizens United, campaign contributions more than tripled, said Mike McCabe, executive director of the government watchdog group Wisconsin Democracy Campaign.

McCabe spoke at the UW-Whitewater campus on Monday night to about 30 people.

“We are seeing a system where money matters more than people in politics,” McCabe said.

Citizens United was the decision that equated money with the right to free speech and said corporations had the same political rights as people, McCabe said.

The decision allowed the creation of super PACs, which funneled enormous amounts of money into elections, including those in Wisconsin.

McCabe said election spending in Wisconsin grew from $122 million in the 2006-08 election cycles to at least $394 million from 2010 through 2012.

McCabe drew connections from the money to the politicians to what he sees as a political system in peril.

The highest-spending candidate wins nine times out of 10 in Wisconsin, McCabe said. And once elected, the money controls the agenda.

Why is the Legislature intent on passing mining legislation while polls show a majority opposes easing environmental protections to make mining easier? McCabe asked.

McCabe’s answer: Pro-mining interests have given nearly $16 million to the governor and legislators, while anti-mining groups have given politicians $25,000.

And why don’t politicians ever debate the rising tide of poverty? McCabe asked. Because poor people don’t contribute to their campaigns.

McCabe sees the same problem with rural issues. McCabe’s organization found that the majority of Wisconsin campaign contributions come from 32 urban or suburban ZIP codes. Rural issues are not discussed, he said, because politicians don’t hear the rural money.

Activists with an organization called Move to Amend have succeeded in getting a referendum on the subject on the April 2 ballots in Whitewater and Fort Atkinson.

The referendums, similar to those passed by 11 states and hundreds of municipalities nationwide, call for lawmakers to work for a constitutional amendment that would allow campaign spending to be regulated once again, overturning Citizens United.

More such local ballots are to come, said Erik Kirkstein of United Wisconsin, who also spoke Monday.

Kirkstein said he didn’t know of any other ballot initiatives in Rock or Walworth counties, but a statewide petition drive seeks to push lawmakers to put the question on a statewide ballot in 2014.

United Wisconsin is no stranger to petitions. It was a driving force in the petition drive that forced the failed recall election of Gov. Scott Walker last June.

McCabe said the ruling Republicans in Madison are in favor of the Citizens United decision, and unlike at the local level, a petition can’t force their hand.

But the idea is to confront lawmakers with the petition and ask why they would be afraid to hear what voters have to say, McCabe said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(8)
WalterReuther
Mar 6, 2013 at 3:15 p.m.
Suggest removal

Wow. Something that people can agree on...well most people anyway. Get all special interest money out of campaigns ASAP. I personally think donnaw's idea is pure genius. What's interesting is that Libs fought tooth and nail against Citizens United but the Obama campaign was able to both circumvent and, to a lesser extent, embrace its effects. Granted, the Obama machine is more formidable than most in US history AND the GOP ran a god awful candidate, but given the shape of the economy there's no way President Obama should have had the votes for reelection. What you'll see now is the Democratic National Committee enlisting the Obama machine to train the subsequent Dem nominees campaign team. This is gettin' good.

tedmlewis
Mar 6, 2013 at 2:31 p.m.
Suggest removal

We all should agree that excessive money doesn't belong in political races. I am a staff person for a union, and would gladly surrender union donation influence, in exchange for getting the crazy dollars out of political races. We should be able to evaluate politicians by the merits (or lack thereof) of their ideas, instead of by who can buy more airtime.

vnvet7071
Mar 6, 2013 at 7:21 a.m.
Suggest removal

Donnaw...very good idea. Chances of it happening...phewt ! But I like your way of thinking.

donnaw
Mar 6, 2013 at 6:04 a.m.
Suggest removal

I think the money spent on campaigns is obscene. I would solve it by saying if you want to give money to xyz race (both sides included) such as governor, you can put, let's say $1000 tops into the pot. Then all the money collected is divided up and distributed evenly and anonymously. Therefore the candidates don't know who donated the money.

RetiredAirForce
Mar 5, 2013 at 11:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

Money is only a problem for partisans when the other side has it.

whz_bng
Mar 5, 2013 at 4:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

Money talks, always has. That is why it is important to Support your candidate financially. Obama won because he had a bigger war chest.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT