Study: Many seniors can't afford basic necessities
Podcast Episode
Kyle Geissler talks with Janesville Gazette reporter Gina Duwe about a study on the economic challenges facing senior citizens, including seniors in Rock County.
JANESVILLE An elder resident of Rock County who owns a home needs $17,639 annually to cover basic living expenses, while a couple needs $27,405, a new study released Tuesday found.
But the average county Social Security payment this year is $13,547 for an individual and $22,108 for a couple, leaving a gap of $4,000 to $5,000, according to the study.
The Elder Economic Security Standard Index shows many senior citizens in Wisconsin don't earn enough money to meet their basic living expenses.
The report is part of a national effort led by Wider Opportunities for Women to raise awareness and shape public policy to improve seniors' economic well-being.
The Wisconsin study determined that a single person older than 65 needs at least $19,810 a year to meet basic living expenses. But it found that the average income of a woman older than 65 is just $15,395. The average for a male senior citizen is just $18,223.
The index measures the cost of basic expenses including housing, food, transportation and health care for older adults in today's economy to continue living in the community setting of their choice.
The federal poverty level standard—used for many assistance programs—is $10,400 for a single person and $14,000 for a couple, leaving advocates pushing for the new index to replace the outdated poverty level.
"Social Security was never intended to be the sole source of retirement income," said Sharyn Wisniewski, chairwoman of the Wisconsin Women's Network, in a statement. "But economic conditions, the loss of employer-sponsored retirement plans and disadvantages that disproportionately affect women and people of color leave few options for retirees today."
The study also found:
-- Social Security is the only source of income for one of five seniors in Wisconsin, most of whom are women.
-- Housing costs put a heavy burden on some elder households, representing as much as 44 percent of their total expenses.
-- An elder paying market-rate rent in Wisconsin has expenses reduced by only 30 percent to 36 percent when a spouse dies, yet his or her income mix of Social Security and/or pension income might decrease substantially.
-- Elders in Wisconsin face combined health care costs (insurance premiums plus co-pays, deductibles, fees and other out-of-pocket expenses) of $384 to $402 per month.
-- The need for home and community-based long-term care can double or even triple an elder's expenses. Adding a low level of care for one person adds $7,200 per year to living costs. Requiring a medium level of care adds $18,900, and needing a high level of care adds $33,600 to $42,000.
Ramsey Alwin, Wider Opportunities for Woman program director, said the numbers show that both public and private solutions are needed to bridge the gap.
"Wisconsin elders and their supporters have the opportunity to shape realistic and groundbreaking policy that will not only benefit Wisconsin seniors but can lead the way to critical national policy and programs, whether they be related to retirement income, health or work," Alwin said.
Wisconsin is the fifth state to launch the index, which will be a new tool to help policy makers, advocates and service provides better assess the outcomes of elder policies.
Sen. Jon Erpenbach, D-Waunakee, chairman of the state Senate Health Committee, said in a statement: "We need to build off of our existing programs for the elderly like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security as well as our state programs like SeniorCare to ensure that no senior citizen is forced to choose between health care and food or shelter."
Jul 13, 2008 at 10:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
dnsweetman6969 - You do realize you used a double negative in your sentence "So no luck had nothing to do with it." implying that luck did have something to do with it. Sorry, but with all your comments about intelligence I just couldn't help myself.
Jul 12, 2008 at 8:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Spunkmaster. LOL. Sweet.
Jul 12, 2008 at 11:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Dns i work retail and i make DARN GOOD MONEY for my age! i DO NOT APPRECIATE you insinuating that i am not smart enough to work someplace else. did you ever think some have no desire to continue education
Jul 12, 2008 at 10:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
dnsweetman -
You don't have a degree, but you wound up with a good job. That's luck, buddy. Not intelligence. So before you get a nosebleed from that high horse of yours, maybe you should remember that not everybody has the luck that you have.
Jul 12, 2008 at 10:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
I think that he is bragging.
Jul 11, 2008 at 8:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
dnsweetman6969: I can't tell if you are bragging or complaining in your posts.
Jul 11, 2008 at 8:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
knowing that there is section 8 available, there are many places that have waiting lists for those that do qualify for it... sadly, the younger generations are struggling now, much like the rest of us... many companies now are only matching 401K's at $.20 to the dollar and paying less what one would be able to get by on in today's day in age... the price for tuition has skyrocketed over the last 5 years, and many people can't even afford that... I know of a few people in their 50's & 60's that, even with college degrees and having a 401K set up, are still struggling and being forced to hold down 2 jobs just to make ends meat with the hope to be able to retire before they turn 70... people talk about how they bring in more than $30K/year... good for you, however, that bracket is significantly smaller than what a lot of people are able to grasp in the light of reality... we can't rule out military disability pay or military retirement pension... the retirement pension is only for those that served for at least 30 years (and thank you to those that have served)... that doesn't cover cost of living after discharge... at that point, you're back on your own again, hoping that you have enough to pay your bills and eat your next meal...
Jul 11, 2008 at 1:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
I think it's great if you make a lot of money. I'm sure that you've worked very hard for it, but we should examine the issue of Seniors. They are faced with an economy changing so quickly that their investments/savings--which may have been ample to secure their lifestyle ten years ago--are no longer going to cut it.
I also think that my generation (I'm 28) in particular, has a huge issue with saving. We're a generation that (for the most part, I am generalizing here) has not faced any real social or economic crisis. The majority of people I socialized with while growing up in Janesville were provided with their own cars, spending money, cell phones (or pagers, remember those!!), college funding, etc. Now, that they're faced with the economic responsibilities that come along with being an adult, many are facing enormous credit card debt because they have no idea what it means/takes to be fiscally responsible. I wonder what their portfolios will look like when it comes to retirement.
Jul 11, 2008 at 1:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
gmaof3-I applaud your daughter. I can't imagine the difficulties she's enduring everyday. I just wanted to let you know that from what I gather from your post, you've set an amazing example for your children. Everyday she wakes up and goes to work, and every minute she spends working towards her degree are excellent investments in not only her future, but the future of her children.
Jul 11, 2008 at 1:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
First of all, it was not a dig on people that make a ton of money. I do know lots of people that worked VERY hard for the millions that they made. Unfortunately, many of them do not know what it is like in the streets. There is a lot to be said for street AND book smarts.
The point of this article goes back to seniors not being able to provide for their most basic of needs. They also tend to be the FORGOTTEN people (generalization).
AND FOR THE RECORD, I DO NOT WORK IN A FACTORY!! I have a 4 year degree working in social services. I currently work in assisted living with people that have a wide variety of disabilities. The rewards from that are FAR MORE than any dollar amount!
Jul 11, 2008 at 5:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
I'll be 50 this year, and fortunately, my husband started his 401K, and investment plans when he got out of college. However, we never had a lot of extra cash to throw around with 4 children.
I do feel however, that I may have let my daughters down, with regard to instilling the need to invest. It was never anything we openly discussed. But my girls actually thought we were rich, Ha-haaa! I bought their clothes at garage sales or off the sale racks. Never brand names of anything.. no yearly vacations, or big trips. Lots of casseroles and left overs.... A public education and no savings funds for them.
Now my oldest is a single parent, has 3 children, has a life altering degenerative disease and a full time job (she makes just $14 dollars a month too much, to qualify for food stamps). She IS the working poor! On top of that, she's taking on fulltime college courses through UW Platteville on line and will have the degree in five years. Her hopes are to be gainfully employed with the state before her disability cripples her to the point of being wheelchair bound. I'm so proud of her.
So it can be done... then there are the section-8's, but that's another story.
Jul 10, 2008 at 11:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Stevev: You are so correct. I am working with my youngest daughter of 21 and she is starting her own investment program now. She sees what it did for me and I hope she will stay with it. Good Advice.
Jul 10, 2008 at 11:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
I congratulate anyone who has invested wisely and secured a good enough job to receive enough S.S. to live on comfortably, BUT.......I grew up on a farm and my mother was a farm wife raising 5 kids. She worked her tail off everyday helping milk 35 plus cows (and still raising us 5 kids) and never worked off of the farm until she was almost 45 years old. My father passed 25 years ago and now she is living on $1100 per month social security. Not too much social security is paid in for a non-working farmwife. Food pantries and St. Vincent Depaul helps her survive along with what us kids can help with. Not everyone is forunate to have lucrative employment. Yes, she had a choice, but farm living was a clean wholesome life and very fulfilling. That is why I worked hard and now have a retirement income, military retirement, social security, and a great part time job. I thank my Mother for showing me what hard work is all about. I will get down off of my pedestal now.
Jul 10, 2008 at 10:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
The moral of this story for anyone in their 20's or 30's is START SAVING NOW!!!!!! I really hope people my age read this article and take it to heart. The days of living off of Social Security and pensions are long gone. If you have an employee sponsored pre-tax plan, take advantage of it, especially if there is employer matching. Don't worry about the volitle market. Over time, you will come out ahead.
Jul 10, 2008 at 10:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
momof5, don't hold your breath on the job offer. As you can see from some of zero's past comments he was probably on time out from the internet, not on vacation as stated, as he did not keep his room in the basement clean at Mom's.
Jul 10, 2008 at 8:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
sorry, janesvillehero, I was a little too harsh on you. The short and sweet of it is, you are you the mascot for the Democratic party.
.
Sure. I'll take a job from you. Where should I apply?
Jul 10, 2008 at 8:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
dnsweetman6969:
I guess I never lucked out with getting a job where a mob-controlled union could extort huge salaries and pensions out of the stockholders, or a management position with huge bonuses and a golden parachute not tied to executive job performance.
:)
I wasn't ragging on people fortunate to make more money, just noting how difficult it is to achieve Bob Brinker's "land of critical mass". If you look around, you may notice that there are more people around then there are $50,000/year jobs. You aren't one of Dan Quayle's proteges, who thinks that everyone can have an "above average" job, are you?
.
It's easy to tell people to get more education, but without money for tuition and the ability to schedule classes around a job, it is difficult to get the diploma or degree which only sometimes gets your foot in the door to a better job. A lot of opportunities are also "who you know", rather than just "what you know".
Jul 10, 2008 at 4:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
sounds like a couple of people on here need a private chat room to duke it out.
AS for learning to live on less, it can be done. I know someone who raises 2 girls 7 and 10 on here small disability check (about $14,000 per year)she was(injured at a job years ago and can not work). She has learned that coupons, less driving, and the Goodwill store are a great help!
Jul 10, 2008 at 3:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
ps--I have an educations and I never knew it was pluarlizied. Are you the father of eclipse?
Jul 10, 2008 at 3:57 p.m.
Jul 10, 2008 at 12:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yes, momof5, I'm back from an extended vacation. This flooded town was becoming too dreary to be around so decided to take a trip someplace nice. I see the waters have gone down, but the smell still exists. And to answer your question...no, to my employees that would live places that get flooded...I do NOT pay them over $30K. But to those who matter to me and have educations, they are very well taken care of. Why, looking for work?
Jul 10, 2008 at 12:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
I got an earnings statement from Social Security last month. They tell me if I retire in 9 years at 62, I will get $9804/year in benefits. If I wait until I'm 66 1/6, they will give me back $13,980/year, and if I can hang on until I'm 70, I will receive $19,200/year. Only Alan Greenspan could guess what it will cost to live in 9 years, and he's retired from his job as financial swami. I guess that means I will need to rely on some personal savings to supplement that.
.
Unfortunately, the 3 IRA funds I started over a decade ago, got stomped by the DotCom bust, flattened by the market reaction to 9/11 and are now being ground to dust by Wall Street's nose dive in response to the oil and mortgage broker thievery. I've been contributing to the 401K fund of my current employer, but the investment options available are limited to mutual stock and bond funds. There's no "Invest in Dick Cheney's clean-up with sekret Haliburton investments" option and no "Ali Baba and the 40 Petroleum Thieves" stock choice, so that part of my retirement investing is struggling to not dwindle to nothing as well, in spite of employer-matching funds.
.
The ideas floated by the survivalist movement of the late 60's - stockpile freeze-dried foods, junk silver coins, ammunition, and wait for the inevitable economic collapse, are starting to sound reasonable again. Perhaps the Wisconsin Lottery commission should offer a pool - bet on hyper-inflation and even more devaluation of the dollar, or world depression and 1930's-level unemployment , or the ever-popular choice of government distraction - war. Not a little volunteer fighter and political kickbacks to bankruptcy war like Iraq, but a conventional bring-back-the-draft world (or at least multi-continental) war.
.
Unfortunately, the Lottery would probably want us to pay for the tickets in Euros, or even Canadian dollars, which are worth more than US dollars. That's kind of irritating, having grown up when the local banks refused to take Canadian currency because it wasn't worth as much as American currency.
Jul 9, 2008 at 10:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
Are you suggesting that those of us who make more than 30k a year do not actually work? Where is it written that you have to be dirt poor, get dirty and sweat alot in order to be considered someone who actually works? Sorry, I don't subscribe to "the nobility of the poor" mentality. Its just a justification for envy.
Jul 9, 2008 at 10:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
how about this... the community should start an alliance for ALL people that make less than $20-$30k/year and actually WORK for a living... flood victims welcome... any takers??
Jul 9, 2008 at 9:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
Kudos to mooshoo!!
Jul 9, 2008 at 9:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
My comments break the rule of niceness, but I feel the need to unload. The JanesvilleZero suffers from epostile dysfunction. He is a cyber bully and a troll. He enjoys baiting people. In fact he is a master baiter.
*
He states: "If people in this state spent more time saving money and looking to the future, instead of spending it in bars and liquor stores they would not have this problem. We need to change the image and mindset of this entire state! Wake up people! Big government shouldn't be solely responsible for taking care of your needs. I, for one, find it difficult to understand how someone could even live on less than $20-30K a year."
*
His situation likely is: I spend too much time and money in bars and liquor stores and wish I did not have this problem. I can't change my image and mindset! Wake me up! Big government takes care of my needs. I, for one, find it difficult to live on less than $20-30K a year."
*
There are plenty of good, self reliant, hard working people who survive on 20-30K a year. Any self proclaimed hero is nothing but a self-centered loser.
Jul 9, 2008 at 8:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hats off to rusty - good job. You could teach the rest of us a lesson or two.
Jul 9, 2008 at 8:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
since Social Security is the sole income of 1 out of 5 seniors -Why do the Republicans want to get rid od Social Security? How heartless can they get? They must have forgotten where they came from is all i can logically assume.
Jul 9, 2008 at 7:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Ah, our good friend, JanesvilleHERO is back.
.
How's your pond?
.
And, since you said, and I quote "Wake up people! Big government shouldn't be solely responsible for taking care of your needs. I, for one, find it difficult to understand how someone could even live on less than $20-30K a year."... DOES THIS MEAN YOU PAY YOUR EMPLOYEES MORE THAN 20-30k YEARLY??? You know, the ones who inconvienenced you by having their homes flooded?
Jul 9, 2008 at 7:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
I might add that we own our home & it's paid for now
Jul 9, 2008 at 7 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hero....I & my wife are making "do" living off my military retirement/disability which totals out LESS then $15K a year. We ARE saving money & "my stars & garters" I actually had one beer at home about a month ago! I also have another beer that's been in my fridge for about a year now.
Actually, I feel sorry for people who think they need $20-30K minimum just to get by!
Jul 9, 2008 at 6:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'm with prevention... there are plenty of people that don't drink up their paychecks and have to actually WORK to get what they have without having to go through the state for assistance... just because we don't work for companies such as GM... oh, I'm sorry... many of them are now in a similar boat (or will be soon enough).... just because a person does factory work doesn't mean that they didn't earn what they DO have... in today's standards, all that a degree is is a piece of paper that says that you're qualified... even then, the professional occupations REQUIRE you to have MINIMUM 2-3 YEARS experience prior to consideration for ANY position...
Jul 9, 2008 at 2:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
So, is it safe to assume that you are living on a 6-digit income?
There are many people that do not go to the bars and/or consume alcohol. There are many families that live on less than $20,000 a year.
We make due. We cut corners when we have to. We do not spend, spend, spend carelessly. We work VERY hard to obtain what we do have.
So, before you criticize ALL of us poor people, know where we are and what we do. It is not as easy for all of us, even with a college degee, to make your 6-digit incomes.
I am offended my your comments that all poor people drink up their small incomes.
Jul 9, 2008 at 12:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
If people in this state spent more time saving money and looking to the future, instead of spending it in bars and liquor stores they would not have this problem. We need to change the image and mindset of this entire state! Wake up people! Big government shouldn't be solely responsible for taking care of your needs. I, for one, find it difficult to understand how someone could even live on less than $20-30K a year.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.