School board OKs school bus belts

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Wednesday, Nov. 26, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— Some but not all Janesville schoolchildren will be required to buckle up when they ride buses to school or games next fall.

The school board voted Tuesday night to have seat belts installed on up to five new school buses in the coming year.

Federal rules require belts on buses weighing less than 10,000 pounds but not on larger buses, officials said. Tuesday’s action applies to large buses.

The Van Galder Bus Co. operates 58 buses under contract with the district, transporting about 1,350 students to and from school each day, Steve Van Galder told the board. Thirty-two of those are large buses.

The buses also are used for student and sports-team trips outside the district.

The board discussed requiring belts on all new buses until the entire fleet is converted. But members backed away from that idea over the course of a lengthy discussion.

The cost of including the three-point belts on new buses was estimated at $11,000 per bus, for a maximum expenditure of $55,000.

The spending comes at a time when the board is being told it will have to make cuts to balance its 2009-10 budget.

The board voted to take the money from its fund balance, a cushion fund used for a variety of purposes. The board has used the fund to lower taxes and avoid borrowing and for purchases that don’t recur each year.

Because the buses belong to the company, the district will have to renegotiate its contract with Van Galder, officials indicated. The cost of the belts would be built into the contract price.

Cost is one reason why Greg Ardrey voted against the belts.

Ardrey noted that the board also will be spending to upgrade the district computer system next year.

Ardrey said he didn’t have enough information to make a decision.

“I’m not even sure our contractor supports it,” Ardrey said.

Van Galder did not urge the board to vote one way or the other. Neither did he seem enthusiastic about seat belts.

Van Galder said he’s not sure how a driver could assure that a student sitting at the back of a bus wouldn’t unbuckle a belt sometime during the trip.

The driver and the school administration will be responsible for enforcing the rule that all children wear their belts, just as they enforce other bus rules, according to a district memo.

Some board members were concerned that the belts installed now would have to be modified later if the federal government comes up with new rules.

Van Galder said the district should pay if the government requires any retrofitting.

But Tim Cullen, who originated the idea, said the government’s new rules, now close to final approval, leave the question of seat belts up to local governments, and any change to those rules is unlikely.

The board’s action has no affect on the Janesville Transit System buses, which also transport students to school.

The number of buses to be outfitted with belts depends on the number of buses the company decides to replace next year.

Van Galder said he normally orders new buses in January and takes delivery in August.

The board did not commit to adding belts to new buses in succeeding years, although at least some board members are interested in converting the entire fleet.

Officials have said they are not aware of any Wisconsin school district that requires seat belts on large buses. Van Galder said only four states require them.

In other business

In other business Tuesday, the Janesville School Board:

-- Discussed a parent complaint that a school bus trip from a rural subdivision were too lengthy, resulting in a 92-hour day for some Edison Middle School students. The only apparent solution was to add a new bus route, but no board member seemed willing to commit to the expense.

-- Voted 8-1 to approve a contract with the Beloit, Beloit Turner and Clinton school districts for the new co-op girls hockey team, the Rock County Fury. Peter Severson was the “no” vote. Cost was expected to be around $16,000 this year.

-- Voted 8-1 to approve an audit of central-office staffing at a cost not to exceed $5,735. Kevin Murray voted “no.” Strategic HR Solutions of Verona will conduct the audit, which is aimed at helping the board make decisions about cutting positions if it needs to in next year’s budget. Board member Tim Cullen noted that the district studies its teacher-staffing needs each year, but the central-office staff hasn’t been studied since 1996.

-- Heard Superintendent Tom Evert say, in conjunction with the item above: “We anticipate there will be reductions in staffing for the 2009-10 school year.”

-- Discussed naming rights to newly built facilities at Craig and Parker high schools. Donors would have to pay at least half the cost of the facilities, such as the new gymnasiums, in order to qualify for naming rights.

-- Provided, for the first time, designated seats for members of two district unions and the Janesville Area Council-PTA at the board meeting. No one sat in the union seats.







reader COMMENTS (5)
jvlsbdrv
Nov 28, 2008 at 10:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

I agree with farm girl on this issue,I think it is just another want by the school board that the school dist.has to be #1 in the state as far as seat belts is concern when safety on the school bus is already there.  The money the school board is spending could be put to better use if they were concern about safety.  for example the traffic around all schools could be improved,we find parents etc. going 20 or more mph while children is present,also school buses and cars donot mix, loading and unloading around school zones is a problem!  It seems to me the school board is more intrested in spending the money,in areas where there is not a problem, and not in areas where there is a problem regarding safety of school children. I ask the school members how about fixing some problems outside the schools and before the children get on the bus! We bus drivers have done quite
well in service and keeping the school children safe inside the bus for 61 years!

garyprimer
Nov 27, 2008 at 11:20 p.m.
Suggest removal

I just hope that this doesn't cause more distractions for the bus driver. Will the bus driver be liable for injuries to a child that removes his or her seat belt or fails to properly use it?

farmgirl
Nov 26, 2008 at 7:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

I agree having seatbelts on a bus makes no sense. I still wonder how they will seat 3 to a seat? and how they will monitor the usage, not to mention the fact that these seatbelts are now going to be a potential weapon for bullies to use.(shaking head)
*
What does the National Trasportation Authority reccomend for school busses? dosn't seem to be a big issue since they don't have a federal law requiring them, and we are going to be the first in the state to have them??? why has there been a issue where we see that the NEED is there or is this just another want?
*
I have ridden the school busess and I can forsee a big problem with having mandatory seatbelts. I sure hope the JSD is ready for the first lawsuit when a bully uses one to hit or strangle another child, or heaven for bid a true accident and a child is traped in side because of not being able to unbuckle quickly enough.
*
I think they really need to rethink this issue. Besides is it ecconomicaly the time to spend 11,000 per bus to test this idea especially when that money could be used for actualy teaching our kids.
of course that is only my opinion.

glock21sf
Nov 26, 2008 at 5:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

I have been a school bus driver for 14 years and I cannot believe they have done this. Just within the last decade there was a horrific bus crash in Illinois where the buses rear end was trapped on the tracks and was demolished by a commuter train. All the fatalities occured in the rear of the bus because the kids could not get to the front in time, some made it to the front and were saved. NOW, imagine that all those kids were in seatbelts!!!!!!!!!!

Badgerlvr
Nov 26, 2008 at 4:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

Heaven forbid a Janesville school bus filled with kids "belted in" EVER goes into the Rock River. No one would ever be able to get them all out in time.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT