On Milton district wants boys hockey, but where?
Posted on June 4 at 11:49 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Sigma-that statement could be seen as borderline bully.Were you a hockey player at one time or is it because you could never being a hockey player at one time?
On Cyborg Mitt fails to understand election situation
Posted on September 22 at 2:03 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
They most certainly do need to eliminate allot of people on welfare.It is just that both sides of the political isle can't agree on how much.By the time they get "balanced" in any amount of redistribution,it is always the same thing.Redistributation into their pocket.
Their redistribution is designed to keep the extra gipig of trickle down economics in " power ".
Run along now,"Patriots".......
And don't forget to redistribute this.
On Cyborg Mitt fails to understand election situation
Posted on September 20 at 8:21 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
All things need subsidization at a time or two.Just goes to show how out of touch Romney and the republicans are.
The right redistributes too.They just don't say that they do.
Political contributions,donations to charity,Etc
I read an article about Romney and some of the benefits that he attended.$500.00 dollar a plate.And they aren't just giving it away either.They get it back more than what they put in.What is that called?Redistribution of wealth.
Nothing is wrong with making some donations.But when it is oxymoron to the event,then it is redistribution.Even if it is just a right off,it is still redistribution.
Romney isn't against redistribution.He is just comparing apples to oranges and saying that his way is better.We already know this.
Both sides need to quit calling the American people ignorant.Romney isn't against redistribution,he is just being hypocritical about it,which is the same thing if not worse because it is what amounts to double or nothing.Taking back twice as much as what you put in.
Both sides are calling the American people stupid.Are they on to something?Both sides are insinuating that all Americans should be on welfare.It is about them.They all want to redistribute the wealth.It's just about where.
Yet,the electorate collage continues to change definition so that they can continue to control by way of one or the other.It's as though they want to say that you are all so stupid that this is why they need to run things because you just don't get it.Yet not quite brave enough to just walk in and take it.They played you,and so for this,they need to take over.Theft by deception.
I wonder when you people will quit thinking that you can all become Movie Stars and Doctors by comparing yourself to morons of the same party?I wonder when you "Patriots" will quit thinking that by voting Right means that those are your only choices.
I don't see where either side is tackling the education level of all levels do to the fact that simplicity at there definition has nothing to do with math to make sure your equations are right,as it once did.That is because the power that they yield is such as unprofessional theatrical level of Star Trek scenarios and Hollywood money which has completely confused the "Poor" politician.
Since occupational fluctuation is at an all time high,maybe you better start thinking about getting into the armed forces instead of
A vote for none of the above is still a vote.This isn't a two party system anyway.The two has is dead.
None of the Above is a vote.
On 'As Goes Janesville' screening is Oct. 7
Posted on September 20 at 3:45 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Suitable name.
On Wrong message to youthful voters
Posted on September 10 at 3:31 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
There is no doubt that Obama would rather see the marijuana issue maintain the same status of illegal than legal.It is maintained in both parties that more money is generated toward the politics of both parties rather than back into the economy.
This is the very issue of why it is said that voting for one is the same as the other.Because the president these days is not the one making decisions.I am not saying that a dictator is what needs to be,not even close in my opinion.I am only implying that the precidency these day is really nothing more than someone winning the lottery and having a nice little trip around the world with all the Bennie's afterword.
Our Great elected officials would like to continue on comparing notes on the level of education that it takes to partake in such high office,yet do any consult in the {American Medical Association}AMA?Or is it as such that they are completely content with the free ride that they achieve?I am sure it is the latter.We certainly are at a cross roads when it comes to educational levels.Most importantly however,it is at the level of topic in education to the very simplistic forms that is the most important of education.
Simplicity is the most important factor at any level.An IQ is the importance of going on with the ability to return and check yourself in the simplest forms.The voting agenda(weather you are voting someone in,or out)is on the same basis.It is inconceivable to think that all people will be able to vote regarding all issues,however,it isn't inconceivable to vote by looking at how education is dealt with and the economy and jobs creation there-of.It is quite clear to view when someone is doing the job for which they were hired,or if they are just enjoying nothing more than having a good time on the lottery winnings.
That being said,do you really think that a President is making any decisions,or is there some form of dictator in the back ground running things by racking in the money from drugs and consequently drug enforcement since they feel{don't think} that it would be better to take it both ends than just one.
It isn't that we can kick around the AMA either.But here again,the value of simplicity is just as important.It is simply put however,that the value of simplicity to the AMA{American Medical Association},is much more and properly used than it is in politics.
The AMA is an institution that has ties to every Nation on the Planet earth.You can assume that Politics do also,though you will more than likely find that only through the AMA are they connected in a more fundamental and sound philosophy of the value of simplicity than politics,because politics TODAY works on the philosophy of changing the definitions of words to keep you chasing your tail in circles more so than abridging words through business.
On Roundabout plan back on Janesville City Council agenda
Posted on September 10 at 11:42 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
It might be that Lights are cheeper now, but would they be in the long run? You know; electricity, Repairs, Electric Bills going up?
I know that road work is always an on going situation but wouldn't it still be with a roundabout? Unless there is some differences with going around on a roundabout that tears up the road more than at a square intersection, I don't think that it would be any cheeper for lights than a roundabout.
Then I suppose to that it could be a question on who knows who, and wants to make business for one or the other.
Posted on September 10 at 10:55 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
gazettefan-
Why didn't you stay for the second half?
On No longer an exotic species
Posted on September 9 at 7:06 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Why is it so important that everyone be on one side or the other?Why is it that no one can look at each candidate on their own merritt and issues?
On Introducing President MSNBC
Posted on September 9 at 6:48 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
None-of-Above!
Page 1 of 6 | Next
On Gun group sues Wis. AG over concealed carry rules
Posted on June 15 at 12:43 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
EMMO-The entire political system is only in it for the money.The Repubs and Dems are working together with their Big Gov Small Gov Propaganda,but not We the People Gov.