On Homeowners’ flood claims denied
Posted on August 27 at 1:45 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Approximently 95% of the causes of claims presented for dwelling damage and 92% of those presented for damaged property. And you can increase those precentages by adding endorsements as needed.
On Rotary Gardens to charge fee
Posted on August 27 at 10:01 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
My day can be pretty hectic but sometimes I liked to grab a SubWay and go down to Rotary Gardens to eat lunch and relax. A $1 is no problem and I often left that as a donation anyway. The need for a fee is understandable and I wish them the best of luck. But I won't be visiting for $5.
On Homeowners’ flood claims denied
Posted on August 27 at 9:55 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
It's called Back up of Sewer and Drains coverage. Homeowners insurers offer it as an endorsement on homeowner insurance policies. Even renters can purchase it. All they would have had to do is include it on their policy and they'd have been taken care of.
On Couple plan to rebuild home in floodplain
Posted on August 18 at 8:08 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I wonder if they're confusing a standard homeowners policy with a rental dwelling policy. To be eligible for a homeowners policy the dwelling must be a one or two family dwelling which is occupied, at least in part, by the owner. If it's occupied by another party even if they are related to the home's owner a rental dwelling policy should be written. Either way neither covers flood damage.
Unless I'm misunderstanding something I don't think the issue is who's name the policy is in. It undoubtedly includes a flood damage exclusion.
A federal flood insurance policy, if required by the lender, would be written in addition to a homeowners policy. Federal flood insurance covers flood damage but not damage caused by fire, wind, hail, etc. They also don't provide liability coverage.
On Couple plan to rebuild home in floodplain
Posted on August 18 at 6 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something in the article but my understanding is that the damage was caused by flood waters which caused the foundation to shift. Insurance policies don't cover flood damage regardless of whose name the policy is in.
On Attempted armed robbery reported in Janesville
Posted on August 13 at 10:49 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
What kind of weapon did he have other than a nylon stocking? The headline says it was an attempted "armed" robbery but makes no mention of any weapon.
On Female football player, mother file lawsuit
Posted on August 12 at 4:10 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
On Clinton suing downtown building owner
Posted on August 11 at 3:53 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
A website hit is a hit is a hit. It doesn't matter whether the individual likes what he sees or not. As long as opens the site it's recorded and everyone knows the value of advertising is directly related to the number of hits a website receives. Keep it up kleej, your entertainment boosts the Gazette's advertising revenue.
Page 1 of 26 | Next
On Homeowners’ flood claims denied
Posted on August 28 at 11:12 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Not so, nowind. No offense intended but you are mistaken. If excessive rain caused the sewer system to back up and you had included back up coverage you're claim would be paid subject to the coverage's deductible.
Moco, policy language isn't that complicated anymore and has been rewritten specifically to make it easier for consumers to comprehend. It's your obligation to read your policy and if you don't understand something pick up the phone and ask.
The bottom line is that most consumers don't want to be bothered with it and sometimes that comes back to bite them in behind.