On Stupak Amendment is an insult to women

Posted on November 20 at 9:44 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

Inconvenienttooth, after reading a ton of your posts on all sorts of threads, I've come to the conclusion that you really have little substance of your own. You sure like to argue though, I wonder if you are an old commenter, with a new name...
Princeton link: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

On Stupak Amendment is an insult to women

Posted on November 20 at 9:37 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

Good point 2dognight, they are mostly Liberals too. They are thinning their own herd.

On Stupak Amendment is an insult to women

Posted on November 20 at 9:36 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

If you were able, i.e. a Doctor. Nice try skirting the question, quite Obamalike.
IF we were talking about firefighters or law enforcement, that would be totally acceptable. But that's not what makes your point moronic, I am talking about the victim, the baby. Comparing me to the firefighter, would entail I asked you if you wanted to be aborted. In essence comparing you to the baby. Funny how you compared it though, a fire and a shootout both are situations most people would hate to be in. Just like killing a baby.
It's hypocrisy and you know it. Just like you know women don't admit it is because they are ASHAMED. THEY KNOW IT'S WRONG. Like I said It takes a real idiot to not see that. Then you go on, again, to PROVE MY POINT, you are good! Almost ALL of the examples you stated, are embarrassing. Why would a woman be embarrassed to make a simple "choice"?
I don't care if killing babies in the womb is legal or not. It is wrong. Women know it, that's why they're embarrassed and ashamed. To say a baby in the womb is "scientifically" not a human being is not true. Where is the evidence that proves that? there is none. Not an opinion, evidence. It is like a lot of "sciences". Not the truth.
If it's not a human, then what is a baby in the womb? And don't say a fetus.
"Are you describing our nation's current level of healthcare spending, under a system you approve of? Because you'd be accurate, if so" -There you go again, ruining your own argument. I am talking about Medicare and Medicaid. No I don't approve of them, funny how you act like it's a BUSH policy or something. They said they were going to cost x amount of dollars, both of them. They both have cost triple x amount and then some. This is what will happen with a government takeover of health care. And no, I don't have an appointed bureaucrat or a politician between me and my doctor. I never will.

On Big Foot rolls over Kewaunee

Posted on November 20 at 9:03 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

Congratulations Chiefs! Great game. I'm very happy for coach Haeni. He's retiring this year, and a win was very emotional for him, I'm sure.

On Stupak Amendment is an insult to women

Posted on November 19 at 6:20 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Funny, Inconvenienttruth, how you answered all my questions but the most important. WOULD YOU PERFORM ONE? If not, why?
Funny how NO ONE answered that one...
Try to wrap your mind around this one more time:
Save the whales, rainforest, environment, polar bears, spotted owls, uninsured and lazy, and terrorists, KILL THE FETUS. -typical Libtard mind frame. Hypocrisy in the fullest.
Here's another hard one for you PRO-"CHOICERS" to actually answer...HOW COME WOMEN DON'T TELL ANYONE WHEN THEY'VE HAD AN ABORTION? -Gee, I bet even the most handicapped of Liberal kool-aid brains could figure that one out.
And yes, **PanamaRed**, it is wrong for the government to make me pay for killing a living human being. What example do you have that even comes close? Religion has absolutely nothing to do with it.
I have affordable health care. I bet most of you do too, because you work for it. Look at the Government medical programs we have now. Totally screwed up and way way over any estimated budget or forecast. Do you think it will be different? Do you really want a bureaucrat between you and your Doctor?

I am asking questions here, if this is a debate, and not propaganda answering them would be the correct course of action.

On Police to have extra patrols for impaired driving

Posted on November 18 at 7:17 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Yeah Stacy. Is that this Thursday? I would see doing a little extra next Wednesday night before Thanksgiving, but why tomorrow?

On Stupak Amendment is an insult to women

Posted on November 18 at 7:08 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Making Pro-Life Americans pay for abortions is immoral. Anyone disagree? If so do you disagree with tax payers funding water boarding of terrorists? How about killing of polar bears? Funding the destruction of our environment? Rainforest? Dog fighting rings? Do you see where I'm going with this?
You know damn well that after they pass the bill, they'll put in whatever they want.

On Stupak Amendment is an insult to women

Posted on November 18 at 6:45 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

yeah, yeah, yeah, just keep on rattling off those talking points. Over and over, making me sicker and sicker. Housewife, do you look to Tennessee for all your legal opinion-making? Your miscarriage argument is a moot point, miscarriage is not the intentional killing of a living human.
***To all "choicers" I ask again. Could you perform one?***

On Wis. DNR asks hunters to watch for drug operations

Posted on November 18 at 6:14 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Yes DNR and DEA, we will do your job for you, because hopefully it will save us tax money. You know what would save even more tax money? Legalize it! Stop the greed of our enforcement agencies!

On Stupak Amendment is an insult to women

Posted on November 17 at 7:54 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

The numbers of cases such as the ones you stated vs. cases of convenience are absurdly distanced. You know that.
3,000 babies a day are killed in America. I bet 1% of them are because of medical reasons.