Posted on February 15 at 10:31 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Oh yeah -and the congress is composed of a bunch of weasels too!
Posted on February 15 at 10:23 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
Posted on February 15 at 10:11 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Futureteacher - Well said, and I couldn't agree more.
Posted on February 15 at 9:59 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
gazettefan - In response to your admirable defense of hannah...
"smoking is nasty" - This is an opinion
"smoking is dangerous" - This one has been proven and is about the only thing that has come out of hannah's fingers that is on target!
"a smoking ban in bars is like a health code" - this is borrowed from your own arguments but hannah is not wise enough to back it up with anything of substance; and given that the effects of secondhand smoke are subjective "psuedo - fact" it may or may not be true.
"and overall smoking bans don't harm the bar business" - there are just as many arguments and studies that suggest the opposite... the jury is still out; therfore this is a non-objective statement based on heresy because the other facts are not even being considered.
hannah blogs like a sixth grader who's P.O.'d that her mom and dad left her with a baby sitter she didn't like that smokes. She bases all of her inane arguments on emotion and one side of an argument with out ever doing any actual research...I will never respect those types of biases.
On Anti-smoking groups reject latest offer on Wisconsin smoking ban
Posted on February 15 at 9:35 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Also - your right about the repetition and the "digs". The problem as I see it right now is that a select few "who have controlled this blog" have drawn their proverbial "lines in the sand" and are wasting time trying to change the minds of others who obviously are not (or no longer at least) willing to even consider the other side of the argument regardless of its merrits. Which brings you and I to where we are...basicically not willing to let the other get the "last say" so to speak...sorry I never said I wasn't competitive.
On Anti-smoking groups reject latest offer on Wisconsin smoking ban
Posted on February 15 at 9:30 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Oh...and while I certainly implied or suggested...I did not accuse (I asked) you of anything. You gotta admit though "echolalia" is not a word that most folks use or throw out there with proper understanding of the definition...matter of fact I don't believe I have ever heard that used in a sentence before.
On Anti-smoking groups reject latest offer on Wisconsin smoking ban
Posted on February 15 at 9:24 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Fair enough, but if you come at me again I will not relent. You play nice and so will I.
Page 1 of 7 | Next
On Smoking hurts everyone
Posted on May 8 at 11:16 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Seriously...your still going on about this? If you actually reveiw the posts for their context, it appears Haeght and the anti-banners won this "debate" long ago (at least they presented a more logically consistant argument). Oh, and in case you haven't noticed the ban is benched for the meantime at least. I quit participating in this blog 2 month's ago because nothing new was being added to it. Haeght would state some facts...gazzettefan would say he was off topic, hannah would chime in with a quirky little chirp here and there, and zoom would be there to defend the latter two. The only thing that has changed is that each side has managed to round up a couple individuals into their respective "posse". Do you really think your going to change each others minds at this point? Isn't there another post we can beat to death by arguing in a futile manner?