On Truck hits woman on Highway 51
Posted on September 7 at 8:43 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Now why wasn't he driving with no lights at all!!!???>>>LOL
On None
Posted on August 28 at 3:18 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
There definitely should not be any favoritism. She should get as severe a punishment as all the other criminals that use the system as a revolving door. Look back through their reams of arrest and see what they got on their first offense. If her record is clear and she has been a hard working person ,contributing to the betterment of society in the past then lenient punishment,probation and retribution would be on par with the norm.
On Police searching for robbery suspect
Posted on August 28 at 3:01 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
These Officers are not writing a report to be a best seller. They are detail oriented and everything they write has a purpose." The victim's injuries did not appear significant, according to the police department". Read between the lines !!!!
On Rock County deputy arrested again
Posted on July 18 at 9:22 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Stalker can be arrested for domestic violence w/o touching his wife. Two of the elements of the charge are violence or the threat of violence. The arrest alone doesn't mean that he is a wife beater. WAIT FOR THE FACTS !!!!!
On Janesville police officers recognized for service
Posted on June 8 at 2:06 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
officerfriendly1...I appreciate the post,I understand.
Purrmaid...go back to sleep you missed the whole point.Negativity ?????,enough said.
On Janesville police officers recognized for service
Posted on June 6 at 10:59 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
officerfriendly1......I don't believe that your disrespect for the remaining members of the JPD was intended so I won't take issue with it. I know and have worked with both officers and also find them very deserving. I do believe that the majority of officers presented with these sets of facts would have performed as well. They may have in other circumstances but just not as notable. So I believe many other officers are DESERVING but just not as noted or present at those times and places.
On GM workers in Tenn. want to go ’small’ again
Posted on June 6 at 10:29 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Sorry that was directed at "ihavealife"
...Which "this plant" are you referring to and what deal is in the works...."There's a deal in the works to retool this plant that GM would be really foolish to turn down"
On GM workers in Tenn. want to go ’small’ again
Posted on June 6 at 10:25 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Tarheel...Which "this plant" are you referring to and what deal is in the works...."There's a deal in the works to retool this plant that GM would be really foolish to turn down"
Posted on April 10 at 2:13 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Posted on February 28 at 5:12 p.m.2008 ( Suggest removal )
Wakeupamerica... "everyone needs to wait and hear what the verdict is before you make a decision and mark a man 4 life. there are many cases out there were they accused the wrong person and because people judge them they are then scared 4 life"......
Posted on February 29 at 2:07 p.m.2008 ( Suggest removal )
wakeupamerica .. "If I am wrong I am wrong and I am a big enough person to admit it, but for now I will just hold on to my feeling of being right."..... Wakeupamerica, give me a break,bleeding hearts like you are never man enough to admit you are wrong....When he is found guilty you'll claim an unfair trial,tainted jury pool,lying witness,bad evid. or some other ridiculous reason......I'm looking forward to that apology to all the victims and most likely will be for a long,long time................................
wakeupamerica....If your still out there we're waiting for that apology.
Page 1 of 11 | Next
On Expand drug-dog use? School board to consider options
Posted on November 13 at 10:37 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
carlitosway...You are wrong..if the dog gets a hit on the car that gives them the right to request a voluntary search. If the person having possession refuses then the "hit" gives them probable cause to seize the car and request a search warrant. If the warrant is refused then game over. If the warrant is allowed then they search and arrest if an illegal drug is found.
As far as the constitutionality of sniffing a car..The first question the courts will determine is "Their expectation to privacy". I would argue that no one would have any expectation to privacy outside your car in a public parking lot.