On Attorney barred from DA's office

Posted on February 29 at 3:39 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Bhahaha...ohh wooooww, go lay down! But hey its the weekend time got things to do people to see thank you all for the laughs enjoyed, hope non of you got too upset, if so look into re-prioritizing your lives :) Enjoy your weekends and dini, you wouldnt even be in the same ball park at myself, never mind ME not being able to handle you, haha wish i would of heard that earlier, would of gone well wiht my senior quote!

jolly good time though see you all on the next big controv. topic, cant wait, and "boy, wont that ever be fun" -T.D.

On Attorney barred from DA's office

Posted on February 29 at 3:29 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

and btw im the only one, theres never two of something so amazingly great! Leave it to you however to pull out of nowhere that anyone ever thought differently. :) Cheya

On Attorney barred from DA's office

Posted on February 29 at 3:23 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

You Janesvillians are salty! haha

On Attorney barred from DA's office

Posted on February 29 at 3:14 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

As for you tjncj im curious as to know what you are talking about, my last accident i was not faulted...not that i would ever be. And should i be i dont pay my attorneys a great deal of money years for a permanant retainer so they can do nothing for me, no im sure any traffic mishap wouldnt be an issue for me, and i also am happy to report that my licensee was just fine, even in the officers hands from a speeding issue that i received a warning from the other day...hahaha

On Attorney barred from DA's office

Posted on February 29 at 3:12 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

I belive it was yourself dini who started the personal attack, should i call bill oriley to keep us out of the no spin zone? Perhaps if its an issue for you you should go sit in the corner and not speak. What question was that by the way I really didnt read anything you wrote previously, however it think you are finding it to hard to keep on track here so why dont we take advantage of our weekend and get together to discuss this artical, im sure our points would be much more intresting over a nice lunch dont you agree? (im curious as to see how you turn that one around to some crazy spectacle of accusations and missunderstandings ahaha)

On Attorney barred from DA's office

Posted on February 29 at 2:14 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Dearest Bubbles:
It seems you’ve taken the liberty to dedicate a considerable amount of time to trailing my comments and making some sort of personal remarks. Whether it be reasons of raising your self esteem, some kind of defense, or just plainly feeling threatened I am not sure, but whatever the case it would be appreciated if you put both more thought, and effort into your comments if you insist on wasting the reader’s time. From reading, and based on instinct I’m sure you are more than likely a teacher, most likely at Parker, and therefore you are well aware of who I am, perhaps if you are having issue’s with any of my opinions you should take the time to contact me personally. I have nothing to be ashamed or concerned about with my writings, I say how I feel, that’s all she wrote. As for my “anger problems” I am well able to manage them. I’m happy to report that I have my life organized enough that I can’t be bothered to let something like this upset me the slightest, rather I get my kicks out of upsetting other people, such as yourself. If your finding anger within my writing my suggestion to you would be to re-evaluate how you go about judging people. As far as the honesty with my name I am very proud of who I am, and have nothing to hide, I am very forward very outspoken and I enjoy being that way, and I thank you for the compliment. The suggestions I proposed by the way from my attorney were the charges that could come up for a comment someone left me, everything else was my own opinion.

On Attorney barred from DA's office

Posted on February 29 at 2:02 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Once again if peple could please stop taking their opinions and turning them into my words that would be greatly arreciated. I thank those who would have the impression that I am a college graduate, guess I am clearly doing something right, but I myself never said, nor led the impression that I was. Unfortunatly I am stuck at parker until June...perhaps thoughs of you fools calling me out otherwise should do your research before you chose to speak again, or better yet, just dont speak!

On Attorney barred from DA's office

Posted on February 28 at 11:10 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Dearest dini79:
Ha first I have to thank you on behalf of myself and the rest of the crew for the good laughs, greatly appreciated. However, I just had to tell you how funny it is specifically that it was my attorney who brought up the suggestions over dinner this evening…I’m sure he’ll get a kick though out of hearing that he makes “no meaningful legal sense.” Also I must ask which liberal college you graduated form? I need to give that board a call and inform them of their mistake…

On Attorney barred from DA's office

Posted on February 28 at 11:02 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Moving on to your third point, which somehow I am supposed to take reference to your second point…well if you mean by being confused then alright, if you mean otherwise then I’m, well confused. To start out with Mr. Carpenter never once stated he was going to or wanted to personally kill any Muslims. Any thoughts along those lines would be taking his words out of context and turning them into your own personal assumptions. May I suggest you look back to the saying “don’t assume, you only end up making and ass out of you and me”. Instead, Mr. Carpenter referenced his son being a “Muslim killing machine” and how he feels “Muslims should be killed”. Never how he would like to go through with such actions himself. Had Mr. Carpenter had the same feelings towards Catholics, lauthers, etc it would be no concern to me until he started coming at me with a pitchfork or otherwise. People talk crap all day long and I would be fairly certain that I would not seize Mr. Carpenter up to be a person to go on a Muslim, Catholic, Lutheran etc killing spree. Should I feel that way, action would be taken promptly. In addition, I never once suggested mind reading as a tool to evaluate a conversation. However, I applaud you on your god given gift to do so, but suggest that you work on sharpening its powers because had you of been any good at it, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. Anyone with a brain and any social skills, which I feel you may lack both of, from my initial impression of you, would have been able to evaluate Mr. Carpenters conversation and concluded that he was simply stating his bold opinions, whether you agree or disagree.
Furthermore, I must ask of you that you not take your ass-backwards, dimwitted, jabber and label it as “my logic”! Please go ahead and state it as your opinion that it is my logic, such would be your constitutional right, but not do enforceably label it as my own. Continuing I also ask that in your rebuttal, you spend some time to clearly state your points, and make them relevant to the article. This is of course if you’d chose to continue to make yourself look like a joke. Also I do advise you to chose more wisely the people you target with such weak arguments.

On Attorney barred from DA's office

Posted on February 28 at 11:02 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Dear dini79:
Alright well since you chose to point me out directly here is my response. First off I would love to know where you got anything to do with nothing involving a “classroom”. I find the validity of such a statement on your part to be less than creditable, if even worth acknowledging. I’m sure than an educated man such as Mr. Carpenter is able to restrain his comments from the ear’s of our children. I believe such an accusation can be labeled nothing more than hearsay and gossip, and I would appreciate if such could be held out of public conversation until proven otherwise. (I say “proven” meaning a creditable source of judgment, not your Sunday book reader’s gossip hour.) I suppose such a point on your part could be as laughable as using “Wikipedia” as a source of reference for a research paper!
Lets continue on thought to your point number two. Well I guess I will just call a fool a fool for this one: What the heck are you talking about?! Honestly if you insist on wasting my time by singling me out can you please make your arguments are at least slightly relevant. Honestly, this jibber jabber about random things is a bit irking. Clearly, the article states that Mr. Carpenter was making comments about Muslims, and nowhere in the same article did I read anything otherwise. If you could please stick to the article at hand, it would be greatly appreciated.