Wis. election officials call lawsuit 'power grab'
MADISON, Wis. (AP) An attorney for state election officials calls Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen's lawsuit demanding verification of voters' identities before Election Day an unprecedented power grab.
Lester Pines is the attorney for the Government Accountability Board. He told Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi on Thursday morning that the checks are required under federal election law.
He says Van Hollen has no authority to enforce that law and his lawsuit is a "breathtaking" assertion of power.
Assistant Attorney General Steven Means called that argument absurd and asked who could enforce election laws other than the attorney general.
Sumi is expected to rule later Thursday on the board's motion to dismiss the lawsuit.

Oct 24, 2008 at 9:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
Piznat, There is no voter ID required in Wisconsin at the polls. Gov Doyle has vetoed it at least two times. Thus you can show up, if someone at ACORN registered you as Tony Romo, and say you are Tony Romo at the address on the registration card and vote. Those in the inner cities around Wisconsin and the US will be doing exactly that many times during this faulty election. Thank you gov Doyle. Thank you Democrats for supporting ACORN and ruining our election process.
Oct 24, 2008 at 5:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
Many people fail to have knowledge that the state of Wisconsin, along with some other states, failed to follow federal law that required the cross-check of voter registration rolls and other state identification rolls some time ago. This would not be an issue today if the state had done what the were mandated to do in a timely manner. But our state administration decided to not follow the law. That should be what is in front of the citizens now. The Attorney General is the correct person to bring the law issue, and to the courts since the executive branch administration (the Governor) doesn't want to follow the law.
Oct 24, 2008 at 12:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Nice to see that goverment officals can decide on their own when to follow federal laws and when not too.
Oct 23, 2008 at 4:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
Piz--The law you are referring to is a bit more involved than just having i.d. It basically requires election officials to check voter registration info against government data base info, AND, if there is ANY discrepancy (even if it is an apparent typo), strike that voter from the list (the voter COULD cast a provisional ballot, but most just say 'to hell with it' and don't vote. Some local election officials have been accused of not letting people cast provisional ballots either.) In a test to see if the 'checking' system that J.B. supported actually worked, over 1/4 of the election officials themselves were struck from the list due to those kinds of typos. For example, if some overworked employee at D.O.T. spells your name AndersOn, yet it really is spelled En, your name would be flagged, and you wouldn't be able to cast a regular ballot. Hope this helps.
Oct 23, 2008 at 3:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Piznat: I have NEVER had to show ID to vote. Never. Just give my name and address and that is it. Why do you think it is already a law? Friends of mine came up here from another state and she actually was allowed to register her husband without any verification of address. He did not even have to show up. If it is already a law, then the pollsters are not doing their job.
Oct 23, 2008 at 3:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
I am glad to see that Judge Maryann Sumi stepped on Van Hollen's right-wing tips and ruled against him. Enough of his political posturing and wasting taxpayers money on his nut-job theories. I believe he is an embarrassment to his own party, and should be shown the door early.
Oct 23, 2008 at 2:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Checking to see who you say you are is a power grab? Everyone is required by state law to have identification. What's the problem?
Oct 23, 2008 at 2:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
hmmm next thing you know they will be telling you that you can't register at the polls..
Oct 23, 2008 at 12:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
If its already a federal law, why is it breathtaking assertion of power? I believe we had a civil war over who has the final say.
Oct 23, 2008 at 12:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Check your registration status at http://vpa.wi.gov/
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.