ADVERTISEMENT

Public hearing set on Wis. Indian logos

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Tuesday, February 24, 2009 - 10:56 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — People will get a chance next month to tell lawmakers what they think about a bill that would permit education officials to prohibit American Indian mascots in schools.

The Assembly Education Committee plans a public hearing on the measure March 17 at the state Capitol.

The bill calls for the state Department of Public Instruction to investigate complaints about race-based names, nicknames, logos or mascots.

School boards would have a chance to argue the logos or mascots are benign. If the state superintendent finds the complaint has merit, he or she would order the school board to drop the offending moniker within a year or face $100 to $1,000 in fines each day it continues to use it.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(44)
whythink
Feb 25, 2009 at 1:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

toasty

so you don't like liberals because they are willing to stand up for those who feel offended.

It is easy to rip people who are offended when you always sit with the majority. A good representative government doesn't just worry about the majority.

PanamaRed
Feb 25, 2009 at 12:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

So in your view, toasty2k, liberals value human decency, show respect for others and represent those without a voice while the conservatives only serve themselves. Yes, I guess I would agree with your generalization.

toasty2k
Feb 25, 2009 at 10:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

This is nothing more than the liberals throwing more political correctness down our throats. you don't like, then stop voting for these clowns. Otherwise deal with it.

PanamaRed
Feb 25, 2009 at 10:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

Milton "Redmen" supporters blew their chance to keep their nickname when they refused to drop the Indian logo. As others have noted in their posts, the term "redmen" WAS originally coined to describe their sports teams because the players wore red uniforms. Those who opposed the name change COULD and SHOULD have recommended changing the Indian logo to something different. In their case "Redmen" was portrayed by an Indian logo and personally I believe using skin color to describe ANY ethnic group is offensive. Allow the tribes portrayed by the school mascots to determine whether proper respect is paid to their heritage.

mentor397
Feb 25, 2009 at 2:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

There is no such thing as a name that offends no one for all time. Many of these names for these schools have been in place for decades, giving these institutions their own sort of history. Native American is no longer in vogue, American Indian seems to be the PC label for today. What happens when someone objects to depicting this culture as Warriors or Chiefs? Why aren't more teams caled Squaws or Peace Pipe Smokers?

This debate has no end. It will go on for ever and ever and ever and ever...

armyof3
Feb 24, 2009 at 11:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

"All Hail The Great Potato" - Jim Hanson's Dinosaurs.... although that particular episode is irrelevant when it comes down to the great mascot debate, it does have a valid moral to it... if everyone in society gets their way because something irritates them (of which some things are valid), then where does that leave us??
.
anonymous, I agree w/ you as far as covering the basics, or even consider the possibility of using a famous tribal chief/elder... so long as the mascot is not degrading, then why dispute it??

anonymous
Feb 24, 2009 at 10:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

The correct term is American Indian! Not Native American! Yes, if you were born in American you are "native American" which is why we use "American Indian" now instead. I am part of the KBIC Ojibwa tribe in the U.P. and find it particularly irritating when people call themselves "Native American" because their great grandmother's second cousin's friend was Indian. And not every tribe has a casino or profits from casinos! But more on subject, it really doesn't bother me if a high school mascot is an Indian; however, names should be limited to things like "the chiefs" or "the warriors"...

coffeeman
Feb 24, 2009 at 8:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

It just amazes me to see that we deal with the high schools and college teams, but yet the teams with all the money can keep their names. I am talking about the Cleveland Indians, The Atlanta Braves, The Chicago Blackhawks, and the Washington Redskins. It seems that if you have millions to spend, then we forgive those organizations which abuse this as well. I believe if one has to change, then ALL teams, including professional teams, must follow suit.

JohnDoe
Feb 24, 2009 at 8:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

intrigued....FYI

Milwaukee Pius High School "Popes" - Milwaukee, WI

Ever seen their half time show?

Shopierehuh
Feb 24, 2009 at 7:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

twerp13, yours is the definative post on this subject. You know that they are not offended, and I know that they are not offended. The Indians I know take pride in their heritage and are pleased that it is recognized.

It is time to stop the nonsense and be concerned about important issues that truly do affect people.

twerp13
Feb 24, 2009 at 5:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

I have said this before on a blog about this topic, but here I go again. I am a graduate of Milton High School. I will always consider myself a Redman, no matter what they choose to rename themselves. I also have had the great pleasure of talking to literally thousands of native Americans (through my volunteer work at the Heider farm where Miracle the white buffalo was born), several of which were medicine men/women and even chiefs. They all agreed that the use of Indian names and or mascots was NOT and I repeat NOT offensive to them. In fact they felt honored themselves that their heritage was being remembered. The only offensive position they took was that the names be not demeaning (such as the scalpers, etc...) but that redman, chiefs, redskins, warrior were very much. acceptable.
*
By the way the american indian is of the red nation and those that practice their native religion sometimes call it the red path, so in essence there is nothing wrong with calling them the red man.

werpknarly
Feb 24, 2009 at 5:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

by the time our society is expunged of anything that may or may not offend the last person, life with be as exciting as white paste. BTW...some names are obviously wrong. Cracker is bad(unless its whole wheat), white man is ok, last time i checked warrior is good, redskin is bad(unless its a boot)

rooster
Feb 24, 2009 at 4:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

how can we decide how people will react to our labels, in this case mascot labels and school nick name labels. the fact that some people might be offended by white america using native american logos and mascots modeled after native american anything, should be enough for white america to, in these cases, drop dopy tradition and find other mascots and nicknames. how hard is that? tradition will be established by the new students over time and our country will be better for it. go irish!!!!

TheJoker
Feb 24, 2009 at 3:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

Sorry for the double post. I guess something that is so insightful and filled with wisdom needs to be said twice!

TheJoker
Feb 24, 2009 at 3:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

What a waste of time and money! Major problem I have is how do you define "offensive"? I am offended that people are offended as something as stupid as a high school mascot. Get a life. I was not alive when the Indians were taken advantage of, forced out and in some cases killed by our government. I am truly sorry it happened but I know that changing the Bigfoot High School Chiefs to something like the Bigfoot High School Golden Eagles will not even come close to making amends for the past injustice or make one bit of difference to our young people, Indian or non Indian.

There are a 1,000 other more important things to worry about in our state and in our schools than a logo on the wall of a school. Wake up Wisconsin!

TheJoker
Feb 24, 2009 at 3:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

What a waste of time and money! Major problem I have is how do you define "offensive"? I am offended that people are offended as something as stupid as a high school mascot. Get a life. I was not alive when the Indians were taken advantage of, forced out and in some cases killed by our government. I am truly sorry it happened but I know that changing the Bigfoot High School Chiefs to something like the Bigfoot High School Golden Eagles will not even come close to making amends for the past injustice or make one bit of difference to our young people, Indian or non Indian.

There are a 1,000 other more important things to worry about in our state and in our schools than a logo on the wall of a school. Wake up Wisconsin!

coyote
Feb 24, 2009 at 3:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

You can, and should.

mrmopar440
Feb 24, 2009 at 3:34 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
jmags
Feb 24, 2009 at 3:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

I don't think any Schools, Teams, etc. have an Indian nickname to mock anyone. I believe that it's because they have choosen a nickname that has something to do with the area that they are in. This is in honor of the Tribes, Chiefs, etc. Do you honestly think that the Schools used the nickname to mock a certain group of people?

For some teams Like the Redskins, I don't understand the Nickname, but back when it was generated, I don't think they said "hey lets make fun of Indians and name our team the Redskins"

pizza
Feb 24, 2009 at 3:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

Imagine if we used other ethnicities as our mascots; many people would be up in arms.

whythink
Feb 24, 2009 at 2:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

Men, women and children were betrayed, slaughtered and watch as their land was stolen. Now, that same culture says it is whining because they like having a person dress as an Indian and mocking their customs.

Just because as a German I don't worry or care much about my ancestry because I have and my family, easily integrated and assimilated into this society. Nothing was stolen from me or my family.

Marie and Intrigued, by your comments and willingness to attend a class shows you are educated and care about the COMMUNITY not your selfishness.

Dude, it is TOO much not TO much. Get an education.

To all of you saying it is just a mascot, then why wouldn't you support changing it to something that offends no person? If it is so meaningless you wouldn't criticize those who don't like it.

It is 2009, names like Redman and Redskins, Indians, etc... Should be removed.

The ignorance, intolerance and close mindedness of some in this community is amazing.

Chief370
Feb 24, 2009 at 2:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

I went to Big Foot and will always be a CHIEF. Nothing derogatory in that, but they changed their logo as well. My question is what do the indians want to be remembered for? Gambling?, maybe we should change all the indian logos to slot machines or dice, and have nicknames such as the one armed bandits or the Snake eyes. Let's get real. We have bigger fish to fry in the great state of Wisconsin than logo's and or nicknames.

coyote
Feb 24, 2009 at 2:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

"WE ARE SPARTAN!!!"

MiltonRedmen
Feb 24, 2009 at 1:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

"The Seminole Tribe of Florida officially sanctions the use of the Seminole as Florida State University’s nickname and of Chief Osceola as FSU's mascot. Max Osceola, the chief and general council president of the Seminole Tribe of Florida, feels that it is an “honor” to be associated with the university."
.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2...

MiltonRedmen
Feb 24, 2009 at 1:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

Aye, not all this again. I guess since I grew up on a farm and had to husk corn as a kid I should threaten the University of Nebraska with a lawsuit if they don't change their logo/mascot. Booohoo!

marie26
Feb 24, 2009 at 1:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

Intrigued, I'm wondering if you were in my class the other night when we had a speaker about teaching Native American students. He presented information exactly like the information you are describing. I thought that the Catholic analogy he used was really an effective way of explaining how some cultures/religions could be hurt, and not honored, by using their names/symbols as team names/mascots.

He also said something like, "It is up to the person/culture themselves if they feel honored by a mascot, not whether or not someone outside of this culture that says they should be." I think if you really think about this, it should become clear why these issues should be a focus of our Education Committee in Wisconsin.

dudefromjsvl
Feb 24, 2009 at 1:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

Ya'll Complain to much, just shut up and deal with it! I swear this city is nothing but a big soap op. keep the mascots and names, nothing needs to change. ya'll just cry to much. vote on something better like healthier food in chow halls or something, or more protection for students in school or better education, leave everything else alone.

supertruck1
Feb 24, 2009 at 1:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

Redmen was for Red shirts? Don't you remember the indian logo? But, this PC stuff is getting out of hand. We do not live in Star Trek, this is the really real world and people should lighted up a little bit! A committee for this purpose is a joke, but no surprise.

beeferer
Feb 24, 2009 at 1:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

Know what? I am not going to wait until next month to tell lawmakers what I think about a bill that would permit education officials to prohibit American Indian mascots in schools. I am going to tell them now- It stinks! If this is the best issue the Assembly Education Committee can come up with, then it is time to disband the committee.

biggirl
Feb 24, 2009 at 12:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'm against mascots that use Native Americans, but I'm also against the centralized government -- in this case the state -- dictating what localities can do. It can all work itself out on a local level when the locals are ready to act.

piznat
Feb 24, 2009 at 12:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

Grow up....there are too many whiners in the world today. Get some thicker skin or just remember, STICKS AND STONES..... Words do not hurt.

ame8736
Feb 24, 2009 at 12:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

Are you ashamed of your past? Is this why people want the mascots changed?

intrigued
Feb 24, 2009 at 12:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

I think you are all missing the point and perhaps (Dr. Talk I know you are already there) you all should read some of the intense comments on the forum of the article titled "Finding Your Call." It surprises me that it is OK for people who belong to the big 3 religions (Christianity, Judaism and Islam) to get upset about affronts to their religion but when someone dresses is sacred ceremonial garb (read religious) and mocks Indian religion at a sporting event that seems to be OK. The mascot issue isn't just about names. It is about how sacred objects and rituals have been co-opted by white culture in a disrespectful and (in christian language) sacriligious way. As someone raised Catholic I think I can say that Catholics around the country would be unhappy if there was a sports team named the Popes who dressed like the pope and ran around pretending to sprinkle holy water on the fans at half-time.

Though not all sports teams named after Indians engage in this kind of behavior, this is what began the push to eliminate those names.

werpknarly
Feb 24, 2009 at 12:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

Not happy when the redmen lost their name (red for red shirts NOT slang), not happy now. Being part Native American, I’m proud that a school honors Native American. You don’t call yourselves the panthers because you think panthers are weak or disgraceful or a joke. The bald eagle? At the Boston tea party, they dressed as Indians not to hide (to small a town for that back then), but as a symbol of freedom and the new world. There are full blooded native americans who dont find many of these names disrepectful, but they seem to be ignored. AND some of the PC crowd eats this up. SOME wont be happy till out society runs grey with blandness. Check out "Lathe of Heaven", when humans when 'gray' to end prejustices, George's African American girlfriend lost much of who she was.

rusty
Feb 24, 2009 at 12:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

Since I was born & raised in the US, that makes me a native American too?

DrTalk
Feb 24, 2009 at 12:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

At least they said American Indian instead of Native American. They weren't native to America; they migrated from Siberia.

Truth
Feb 24, 2009 at 11:45 a.m.
Suggest removal

As an endangered quadruped in Wisconsin, I feel the Craig's logo is a slap in the nose to my species

melstew47
Feb 24, 2009 at 11:27 a.m.
Suggest removal

are you serious, is there anything or anymore someone can complain about? why dont you just use numbers for everything like you do prisoners, because thats what this has become, prisoners of our own society,all the problems our sate is having right now and theyre going waste time on this? an yes i said waste. i as an native american and irish descent, do not find these logos and etc, offending at all, what is wrong with our society, we have other things to worry about besides logos.

who
Feb 24, 2009 at 11:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

With the economy going down daily, over spending by government, unemployment over 7% and a governor that wants to raise taxes in a dying economy, I am glad to see our lawmakers putting their time to such good us.

BillyClydePuckett
Feb 24, 2009 at 11:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

As a proud person of Scandinavian descent I demand a public hearing and a bill that requires Janesville Parker to change their name as well.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT