ADVERTISEMENT

Watertown area cocaine dealer gets nearly 4 years

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Friday, January 30, 2009 - 9:01 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — One of nine defendants accused dealing cocaine in Jefferson and Dodge counties has been sentenced by a federal judge to nearly four years in prison.

After serving his 46-month-sentence, 22-year-old Perfecto Pineda Duque will be deported to Mexico. He pleaded guilty last month to conspiring to distribute cocaine.

The sentence was the result of a joint investigation by federal, state and five local agencies. Investigators' wiretaps monitored about 8,000 calls in which the defendants allegedly made drug transactions in the two counties.

Two other defendants have pleaded guilty to charges. Another three have already been sentenced and an additional three are fugitives.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(24)
12345678
Jan 31, 2009 at 3:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

I don't use drugs; my dreams are frightening enough.
-M. C. (Maurits Cornelis) Escher

upnorthwi
Jan 31, 2009 at 1:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'm sure these drug lords have been a part of many deaths, being related to an overdose of a user or the actual killing that takes place in the dealers lifestyle. Open your eyes people, it happens all of the time! WE DON"T WANT THE ILLEGAL DRUG LORDS HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!

janesvillean
Jan 31, 2009 at 9:50 a.m.
Suggest removal

Yeah, SarahB, seems to be a shortage of civilized 21st century people around here. The principle of proportionality in punishment is a foundation of common law dating back to the Magna Carta. You'd at least think people would be familiar with the Eighth Amendment. The death penalty for a crime which barely rates four years in the pen? We haven't executed anyone for a crime other than murder since 1964 -- almost my entire lifetime.
.
Last year the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty was disproportionate for ANY crime that did not involve the death of the victim. This essentially struck down several state laws (remaining or in some cases new) regarding capital punishment for child rape.
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/kennedy-...
.
While dealing drugs is a pretty heinous crime, I don't think it's as bad as child rape, and certainly not as bad as murder.
.
I'm not sure they think of Mexicans as human beings, meaning they would be deserving of human rights. They just think it's a convenient way to dispose of a problem. But then we and China are about the only countries that still execute at all. What a proud accomplishment that is.

upnorthwi
Jan 31, 2009 at 12:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

Sarah, I don't see any racism here. I think everyone is sick and tired of the scum that come illegally from OTHER countries,smuggle their drugs in and cause the crime rate to go up. A lot of these people aren't even wanted back in their own country because they are so bad. Why should we keep them here?

janesvillecomments
Jan 30, 2009 at 11:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

I don't see the people on this page posting cheers for Krystal Hart, convicted of killing Everardo Chimal Lopez, an immigrant from Mexico, who legally entered the country and was living and working in the Delavan area.

I admit I am uncomfortable about the quickly growing Mexican population in this country, but I don't blame them for wanting to better themselves - I blame our government for not working harder to stop illegal aliens from entering the country and not cracking down on the people who employ them. If Canadians were doing the same thing, I'd be mad about that too. Of course, since most Canadians have European skin tones and facial features instead of Hispanic ones, they aren't as easy to pick out of the typical crowd in Janesville.

As long as people are immigrating legally into this country, I'm not mad at them, and if our Federal government would protect us from illegal immigration, I wouldn't be mad at it. I think sanctuary cities should be cut off from all Federal funds.

One thing immigration laws should help do is to keep our population from growing, or even shrink it a little. The world, including the U.S., has far too many people in it and our country should be an example to the rest of the world by reducing our impact on the environment. We need to keep improving the standard of living, which traditionally shrinks the birth rate, and prevent population growth resulting from illegal immigration.

Duque wasn't some poor, honest, hard-working peon who got caught relaxing at a party with a few lines of blow, he has been dealing drugs for 2 years and got caught with multiple kilos of cocaine.
http://www.doj.state.wi.us/news/2009/nr0...

SarahB
Jan 30, 2009 at 9:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

Chosen 1: They don't just sound racist; they are racist.

thechosen1
Jan 30, 2009 at 9:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

u people are really sounding racist

SarahB
Jan 30, 2009 at 9:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

OkieFed: You're an "illegal" in this state. Go home.

janesvillecomments
Jan 30, 2009 at 6:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

Execution is a waste. Give them a 5 year suspended sentence as human test subjects and build a Federal prison with special testing facilities to incarcerate the illegal returnees. If they return to the U.S. after being deported and are caught, off to special prison they go. Allow food and drug companies to use them for testing new products. That would reduce the stem-cell research problem and also shut PETA up about animal testing. We could even reduce Detroit's expenses by letting them be used instead of expensive crash test dummies.

Any industry that currently has to try to incorporate human-like testing could save a lot of money. Since they aren't U.S. citizens and can avoid the punishment by staying out of our country, the ACLU would have no basis for complaining. After all, the companies using them for testing are trying to make safe products, they won't be performing cruel and unusual punishment for the sake of punishing the human guinea pigs. It would help make American businesses more competitive.

SarahB
Jan 30, 2009 at 5:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

Execution is wrong.

biggirl
Jan 30, 2009 at 12:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'm for deporting the guy without having the taxpayers pay for prison. Also, I'd like to know the actual evidence that was brought against him. If he had any substantial cocaine, I suspect, he would have gotten far more than 4 years.

Northman
Jan 30, 2009 at 11:58 a.m.
Suggest removal

janesvillean:
.
My screws are checked and cinched down tight. You’d be less confused if you read the whole story, above. The death sentence would not be for illegal immigration. It would be for committing a felony, particularly a drug felony, and then returning after being deported. As it stands, we have a revolving door for deported felons, and there is no reason to allow these people to ever return (and live to tell about it, anyway).

crafty
Jan 30, 2009 at 11:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

right on.

upnorthwi
Jan 30, 2009 at 10:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

I agree with Northman. He wouldn't be executed for being an illegal immigrant, he would be executed for breaking the law of returning to our country when he was already deported for a crime!

MY2CENTS
Jan 30, 2009 at 10:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

So you mean to tell me this guy got 4 years in the US and then he will be deported. Whats the point? Why should we as tax payers take care of this guy when he's just going back to Mexico. Does the US send a bill to mexico to cover his cost? Don't get me wrong I understand what this guy did is wrong but with the way our jails and prisons are so over populated why not just let Mexico take care of this person.

janesvillean
Jan 30, 2009 at 10:10 a.m.
Suggest removal

It boggles the mind that anyone would actually suggest a death sentence for illegal immigration. Sure, it's a problem, but you know, it's pretty nuts. Checked all your screws recently?

Northman
Jan 30, 2009 at 9:58 a.m.
Suggest removal

We should have a 2-part sentence for cases like this. The first is 4 years in the slam, then deportation. The second is a death sentence, which is suspended. If he is ever caught in the U.S. again, the sentence is carried out immediately, with no appeals. That would probably cut down on illegal returnees, and if not, we’ve still solved the problem.

chainsawchuckie
Jan 30, 2009 at 9:51 a.m.
Suggest removal

What a waste of time and money send him back now. why should he only get 4 years. and like marymac said he will be back so we can spend more tax dollars again to send him back to prison again and re-deport him once more. do you really think he is going to learn his lesson? NOT he is probably thinking how he is going to get back into the states as I type. What a joke.

janesvillecomments
Jan 30, 2009 at 9:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

Too bad they can't insert a subcutaneous transponder (© Star Trek) before releasing him so the could track him down if he tried to come back into the U.S.

beeferer
Jan 30, 2009 at 9:26 a.m.
Suggest removal

"Joint" intervention indeed!

spark
Jan 30, 2009 at 9:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

bye, bye

marymac4
Jan 30, 2009 at 9:24 a.m.
Suggest removal

And he will be back in the states in 50 months.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT