ADVERTISEMENT

Budget mandates car insurance for Wis. drivers

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Friday, June 26, 2009 - 10:13 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin drivers would have to buy liability insurance for their vehicles under the state budget poised to pass the Legislature.

The new requirement has been proposed since the 1970s, but always blocked by the insurance industry. This year it's in the state budget that passed the Senate early Friday morning and will be before the Assembly later on Friday. Gov. Jim Doyle has expressed his support for it.

Sen. John Lehman, a Democrat from Racine, has proposed the mandate ever since 2001. He says people want it, especially those who have been hit by uninsured drivers.

New Hampshire is the only other state that does not require the insurance. The Wisconsin requirement would take effect in a year.

Anyone pulled over who doesn't have an insurance card would be subject to a $10 fine.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(29)
NVgrf
Jun 27, 2009 at 9:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

It's about time!

ozzman99
Jun 27, 2009 at 9:20 a.m.
Suggest removal

I just spoke with my car insurance agent and was told because of the cost of mandating insurance to everyone in the state my premiums will go UP NOT DOWN. I was told uninsured drivers will buy insurance for a month just to get their car registered and then stop paying the premiums which costs the insurance companies money to administer. Thank you democraps for another stupid useless policy that is gonna cost me money!!!

ozzman99
Jun 27, 2009 at 9:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

Illinois has mandatory insurance and their courtrooms are packed with people every day who have been fined for driving without it. People who cant afford car insurance aren't going to go out and purchase it because the law tells them to. And yes I know they shouldn't be driving but they do

SarahB1
Jun 27, 2009 at 2:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

Now if we can only get those who hit parked (unoccupied) vehicles to take responsibility and not just drive away ...

gpawcat
Jun 26, 2009 at 11:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

All this time I thought it was a law.

tinkerb45
Jun 26, 2009 at 10:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

It's about friggin time. If you can't afford insurance you shouldn't be driving.

anonomouse
Jun 26, 2009 at 10:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

The only people who don't want this are the people who drive without it. Well everyone needs it. If someone hits me I want their insurance to cover the damage they caused.

cookiedough
Jun 26, 2009 at 10:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

It is about time! All motored vehicles should be required to have at least liability insurance - period! I got hit by someone who did not have insurance, no money to pay, took the person to court, won my case over 1,000 bucks, getting their license taken away thru DMV for up to 20 years until fully paid, and seeking other means to possibly put that person in jail for up to 6 months. Oh well, no skin off my back - uninsured drivers should not be issued a license without proof of liability insurance. All this is being done thru myself since my insurance rates would lose the 10% accident free discount if I filed an accident claim. I have spent over 10 hours driving, on the phone, in court, etc. and all will be worth it to get one deadbeat off the WI roads. About time WI legislation woke up and did something important for a change. Just wait, this may lower all our insurance rates simply because more people will buy insurance creating more money in the insurance companies pockets hopefully passing that savings down to their paying customers. It's about fricking time.

biggirl
Jun 26, 2009 at 8:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

The govt. should not be in the business of propping up insurance companies, but sadly this is typical of our govt. More corporate give-aways, which the elected officials find cheap because we're footing the bill.

countrydawg
Jun 26, 2009 at 7:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

I guess it's all about personal respnsibility. After all if I don't care to get a license and drive anyways why bother with insurance. Who'll know "til it's too late ... for someone else that did.

ncpanfan
Jun 26, 2009 at 2:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

I do realize that it is expensive. (We currently have 4 drivers on our policy)I know that when you add up all the money you spend you think WOW but I also know that if something bad happens it is easier to have insurance that pays for it than to have to come up with it out of your pocket. When I got hit last year by the uninsured driver we still had to pay our deductible (which is a higher one to keep premiums down) and that made me even madder because I felt I was punished twice, once by the driver who carried no insurance and then again because I had to fork out that money (deductible) to get the car fixed.

ncpanfan
Jun 26, 2009 at 2:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

I moved here from a state that required insurance and was surprised to find it wasn't required here. I already do pay more on my insurance to cover uninsured and underinsured motorists so I think it will be nice to have them pay for their own for a change. Having been hit by a WI driver last year who had no insurance I know how much of a pain it is and then your own insurance can go up because you had to file a claim over an accident caused by someone who didn't carry insurance! I am sure my policies will still be the same and provide the coverage for uninsured and underinsured but at least I am being a responsible driver by carrying insurance.

Roadmaster
Jun 26, 2009 at 2:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

This should reduce the cost of auto insurance for those who are currently have it. Right now the insurance companies price into your premiums coverage for uninsured motorists, if everyone has their own liability coverage, your's will only have to cover an under insured person.

That's awesome, one more thing that made Wisconsin great, taken away because a vocal minority complained loud enough. I hope those people who wanted this want to pay more for their insurance.

Roadmaster
Jun 26, 2009 at 12:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

Opps, actually the fine for not having insurance will be $500. The $5,000 fine is for falsifying an insurance document to make it appear that you have insurance.

Roadmaster
Jun 26, 2009 at 12:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

The fine for not having an insurance card in your car will be $10. The fine for not having insurance will be up to $5,000.

intrigued
Jun 26, 2009 at 12:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

What a pointless law. A $10 fine. Well, that will get those uninsured drivers scrambling the get the insurance!

Devilsadvocate
Jun 26, 2009 at 12:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

Andrewjackson says....

"I'm curious, why would the insurance industry not want this?"

Typically there are ton's of paper work involved in these mandatory insurance programs. Take Illinois as an example, additional costs incurred by insurance companies, in regard to the law, actually raise insurance rates for everyone. It's not clear the extent of the Wisconsin plan. If it's simply a $10 fine if you don't have an insurance card, maybe it won't be that bad. Then again I can't see that as being very effective either. Most states with mandatory insurance don't necessarily have more insured drivers, studies show.

beeferer
Jun 26, 2009 at 11:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

Let's see- hundreds of dollars for insurance or $10 for not having it. Wow! I guess people would be crazy to spend money on insurance. I think I'll drop my insurance and go bar hopping and drink myself into a stupor with all the money I'll save. Thanks Gov. Doyle! You're a genius!

andiwonderwhy
Jun 26, 2009 at 10:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

This should include proof of insurance when you register your vehicle....So I can still register a vehicle and pay a $10 fine only if the police pull me over for something else. Again, either I don't know the whole story or the elected officals are making a 11 hour statement of "trying" to pass a law that makes very little sense.

Yooper
Jun 26, 2009 at 10:43 a.m.
Suggest removal

It is about time!!! But come on, a $10.00 fine! What a JOKE!!!

sannio
Jun 26, 2009 at 10:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

If I was driving without insurance now, this new law, with $10 fine, certainly isn't going to get me to buy insurance now. Interesting how this is being reported in the 11th hour of the budget.

rexkramer
Jun 26, 2009 at 10:35 a.m.
Suggest removal

Wow, the democrats are really cracking down on uninsured motorists with this provision. What was the alternative to the $10 fine, having the cop slap the driver on the hand with ruler?

AndrewJackson
Jun 26, 2009 at 10:34 a.m.
Suggest removal

I'm curious, why would the insurance industry not want this?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT