Legislators’ plates are piled high
(MCT) — MADISON — The economy will dominate the state’s next legislative session, but other issues — such as requiring voters to show ID at the polls and allowing people to carry concealed guns — will also get increased attention with Republicans controlling all of state government.
Republicans are unanimous in saying their top goals are creating jobs and righting the state budget, but acknowledge there is broad support among them for the bills on voter ID and concealed weapons.
The GOP has been shut out of the past two-year session because Democrats controlled the Assembly, Senate and governor’s office. With the Nov. 2 elections, voters handed all three to Republicans for the first time since a brief period in 1998.
The Republican dominance of state government sets the stage for them to roll back a number of changes approved since last year by Democrats. Those include laws that allow the early release of some inmates, set requirements for sex eduction in public schools and give rights and benefits to gay couples.
Republicans have passed the bills on concealed weapons and voter ID before, but Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle vetoed them. Doyle didn’t run for re-election, and Republican Governor-elect Scott Walker supports both measures.
Walker plans to call a special session on jobs in January, and after that the Legislature will turn its attention to a two-year budget that will face a shortfall of as much as $3.3 billion. Republicans have promised to fix it without raising taxes.
Senate Republican Leader Scott Fitzgerald of Juneau has said the first bill introduced in his house will be the one on showing ID at the polls. Otherwise, lawmakers are putting all their focus on bills that will help the economy, and other bills likely won’t come up until later in the session, he said.
Here’s a look at some measures likely to get attention:
Voter ID. Republicans passed the bill requiring voters to show ID at the polls three times while they controlled the Legislature during Doyle’s first term, but Doyle vetoed it each time on the grounds that it would make it harder for the poor, elderly and minorities to vote. Republicans say the requirement isn’t onerous and would cut down on voter fraud. Democrats counter there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
-Concealed carry. Wisconsin and Illinois are the only two states that don’t allow people to carry concealed guns, and changing Wisconsin’s law is a top priority for gun rights activists. Doyle twice vetoed bills allowing carrying concealed weapons, and an effort to override the vetoes narrowly failed. Republicans wrote those bills in a way to get as much support as they could in an effort to get the two-thirds majority needed for an override. Now, they will need just a simple majority because Walker backs the right to carry concealed guns. That could mean the next bill will include fewer restrictions than in the past on where guns can be carried.
-Immigration. Rep. Don Pridemore (R-Hartford) has written an Arizona-style bill that would require people suspected of crimes in Wisconsin to prove they were legally in the U.S. or be turned over to immigration authorities. His bill is narrower in scope than Arizona’s controversial law, but Fitzgerald has said he expects a separate bill that exactly mirrors Arizona’s law to be introduced.
-Sex ed. Starting this fall, schools that have sex education courses must ensure their classes are comprehensive and include age-appropriate information about birth control. That change meant school districts could no longer offer abstinence-only courses, though they could decide to drop sex ed altogether. Republicans want to change the law to give local officials the ability to set the curriculum, as they could in the past.
-School choice. Republicans have long championed Milwaukee’s voucher program, which allows students to attend religious and other private schools at taxpayer expense. The program is capped at 22,500 students, and Republicans favor removing that limit. Just under 21,000 students are in the program this year. Also, the Legislature could expand the program beyond Milwaukee. “I think there’s enough momentum to do something like that,” Fitzgerald said.
-Indian mascots. A law approved in May makes it harder for schools to keep Indian team names, mascots and logos. Mukwonago High School was ordered earlier this month to change its name from the Indians, becoming the second school in the state to have to do so.
The law allows a resident of a school district to file a complaint with the state over race-based team names and logos that the resident believes promote pupil discrimination, stereotyping or harassment. The district must then prove its name and logo do not do that. Sen. Mike Ellis (R-Neenah), the incoming Senate president, said he wants to change the burden of proof so the person who complains has to prove the team names are discriminatory.
-Early release. The last state budget allowed certain inmates to be released from prison early, which Republicans argued would endanger the public. Rep. Scott Suder (R-Abbotsford), the incoming Assembly majority leader, said his house would be “reforming and possibly repealing early release.”
-Payday loans. Under a new law, payday loans will be limited to a maximum of $1,500 and loans secured by auto titles will be banned as of Jan. 1. Before the law passed, Wisconsin was the only state that didn’t regulate the short-term loans that can cost borrowers 500% or more in annual interest.
Industry officials hope they can reverse the law now that Republicans are in control, but there is no guarantee of that. Some of the Republicans who voted against the Democrats’ bill did so because they thought it was too weak, not because they thought it restricted the industry too much.
-Same-sex couples. Democrats this session began giving health insurance and other benefits to the same-sex partners of state employees. They also created domestic partnership registries that same-sex couples could sign up for to gain some of the rights afforded married couples, such as hospital visitation rights. Republicans objected to both provisions and could attempt to repeal one or both.

Nov 29, 2010 at 10:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
I suppose my comment could be seen as anti-gun, but it was more directed at priorities. I simply don't see the evidence that gun ownership reduces crime, given that this is one of the single most armed societies in the world's history, yet we also have one of the highest rates of violent crime in the developed world. As such, I think concealed/open carry laws are largely symbolic and flatter gun advocates more than they achieve any of the stated aims.
.
(We have had a local rise in burglaries, which as I've repeatedly pointed out, are happening when owners are not home to defend their properties no matter what weapons they own. So again, guns would not solve this problem, but they would make gun owners feel more like Rambo, so I guess that's what the legislature will focus on.)
Nov 29, 2010 at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
and the pendelum swings back to the right...
Hold on it will swing back again. Not only do our elected officials do nothing to solve the real problems of our state and country, they repeal anything positive when the pendelum swings their way.
Nov 29, 2010 at 12:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
JohnDoe Someone voted for me? For what? Must have been a write in. You know Mickey Mouse gets a lot of votes. Who really do you think I am? I have never ran for anything in my life don't intend to. No time for that stuff.In fact I am looking forward to retirement.
Nov 28, 2010 at 11:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
janesvillean - as long as you're being "cute" about the subject, I'll counter with - If enough lawfully armed concealed carrying citizens shoot criminal assailants, the anti-gun politicians won't be able to gather enough votes to put them back into office.
Socialist whiners are fond of claiming that states with concealed carry laws don't reduce crime very much. What they failed to report was that as the laws were passed in each state, criminals switched from crimes of violence to crimes of property. Much as I'd hate to lose any of my personal possessions to a burglary, I'd prefer that to being robbed at gunpoint in Wisconsin (again).
Nov 28, 2010 at 11:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
A big pile of... bills.
Nov 28, 2010 at 11:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
And what a pile it is...
Nov 28, 2010 at 9:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
And how many of those do you think will vote for you next time around now that they know how much you despise them?
Nov 28, 2010 at 9:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
Well with this new group I will be rich, they are going to cut my income tax, property tax and stop all dead beats and if this done by the second week of Jan. I will call each one of them liar's. They said all of these fixes were easy. So I hate to say they are dead wrong but I will!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nov 28, 2010 at 8 p.m.
Suggest removal
Just wonderin'...how many Democrats do you think voted for you facts101?
Nov 28, 2010 at 7:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
I think they are relocating to Milton facts101...so hold on to your ....hat.
Nov 28, 2010 at 7:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
The best thing leaving Wisconsin is a bus load of democrats. One way tickets of course.
Nov 28, 2010 at 6:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Its about time we required voter ID as most other states already do. The concealed carry issue is already "settled science" in 48 other states. Welcome to America Wisconsin. Lets give the new state governement a little time to solve the problems as the other side has been whining about. In Wisconsin they have been in control for far to long.
Nov 28, 2010 at 6:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
janesvillian - I expect better from you. Please, in the 48 states that allow our natural born right to bear arms, concealed or not, provide evidence that concealed carry increases the murder rate. On the contrary, for would be criminals, the possibility of being shot is the best deterrent to crime, without a shot being fired. Wisconsin also needs the Castle Doctrine, which will reduce the problem of home invasions and home burglaries on the rise in Janesville.
Nov 28, 2010 at 3:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Under the last political party.. you had a choice???
Really what choices were those? Doyle vetoed everything that the democrats objected to. And what choice did you have when they raised "fees" every year? What choice did you have when they raided the transportation fund to pay for the pet projects of Jimmy and the free spenders. I am very interested in how they are going to get rid of 3 billion in debt without raising any taxes. I mean really you can only cut so deep. We could try only plowing snow every third snow that would save a few bucks. We could not build more million dollar outhouses on the interstate.
Nov 28, 2010 at 3:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
Golly gee guys, I thought the republicans were going to do a lot better when elected. Yeah right!
Nov 28, 2010 at 3:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Under the last political party.. you had a choice, with the republican party.. you are screwed
Nov 28, 2010 at 2:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
If enough of the unemployed shoot each other, the rate will go down. Seems logical enough.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.