ADVERTISEMENT

School pay frozen for some, upped for others

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Wednesday, October 12, 2011 - 5:39 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

JANESVILLE--The Janesville School Board voted 6-3 Tuesday to freeze pay for administrators this year but to give a flat dollar increase of $690 to 53 other non-union employees.

The same vote allowed $10,000 for bonuses to certain principals and other administrators for superior performance.

About 109 employees are not in unions. Some are administrators. Superintendent Karen Schulte had proposed a 3 percent increase in spending on pay for this group but met with resistance from the board at an earlier meeting.

Schulte proposed smaller increases in advance of this meeting, and she got part of what she asked for.

Schulte had asked for a $690 increase for all administrators at the end of the year if the budget contained enough surplus. The board rejected that recommendation.

The increases for the 53 non-administrators add up to $36,570.

Voting against the expenditures were DuWayne Severson, Bill Sodemann and Kevin Murray.

For a full story, read Wednesday’s Janesville Gazette, read online in the Gazette’s E-Edition or check back at GazetteXtra.com.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(16)
chelleandlou
Oct 12, 2011 at 3:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

That's a start, why do administrators get "bonuses" for doing their job? That's ridiculous!

undecided5
Oct 12, 2011 at 12:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

they need money, but going to give raises and bonuses? thats crazy,i suggest they cut some of the "fat" as there is a lot of that

realitybytes
Oct 12, 2011 at 12:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

Is that $10k for bonuses a total amount for all eligible or the amount of a bonus for each person eligible? Also, what defines "good performance"?

In the majority of private sector jobs good performance is typically tied to monetary PROFITS of a business division or when an individual exceeds their budget or sales goals. It is an incentive for individuals to boost the MONEY goals of a company.

What goals are these administrators/principals being asked to meet? Since it is the taxpayer that will be paying these bonuses then the taxpayer should know what they are paying for.

whosays
Oct 12, 2011 at 11:20 a.m.
Suggest removal

There is another opportunity to have your SDJ board members answer questions and enter into discussions beyond the formality and constraints of the regular board meetings. Our monthly listening session “Community Conversations in Excellence” will be held this Friday, October 14, 2011 at MADISON SCHOOL, 331 North Grant Avenue from 3:30 PM until 5:30 PM.

Karl Dommershausen
SDJ Board Commissioner
(608) 774-8660

MadCityDad
Oct 12, 2011 at 10:23 a.m.
Suggest removal

And a company that can't pay bonuses because it is losing money despite superior performance by some employees could expect those employees to seek greener pastures. Ever wonder why Janesville School District can't keep principals?

Badgerlvr
Oct 12, 2011 at 10:01 a.m.
Suggest removal

Could this be??? Do the "right" AND "left" both agree? Amazing!

unclesmoothie
Oct 12, 2011 at 9:43 a.m.
Suggest removal

Reads like a comic book huh?

Rawhide
Oct 12, 2011 at 9:13 a.m.
Suggest removal

It appears the majority of monetary increases are going to the top 1% of education employees now. Sound familiar?

garyprimer
Oct 12, 2011 at 8:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

Freeze pay, but give bonuses.
They just can't help themselves.
Oh, wait, I guess that they can help themselves... to more money.

wislady
Oct 12, 2011 at 8:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

Voting against the expenditures were DuWayne Severson, Bill Sodemann and Kevin Murray.

Thank you, for representing the voice of reason.

nicksmom
Oct 12, 2011 at 8:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

Absurd but not surprising.

luvujvl
Oct 12, 2011 at 8:35 a.m.
Suggest removal

Precisely. That amount could have paid for another teacher or aide who lost their job.

hdonlybob
Oct 12, 2011 at 8:27 a.m.
Suggest removal

Here we go again. Sending the wrong message, and spending money wrongly.
Superior performance is to be recognized, and it a very respectable thing...but in times like this, bonuses are wrong.
If you have a worker in a private business that is doing superior work, but the company is loosing money, no bonus would be given.....
Another example of the little things that add up to why we are in financial distress...
No one is paying attention here....

dumbledorf
Oct 12, 2011 at 7:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

I guess Schulte doesn't realize that we don't have any money? How many union teachers are going to get laid off now?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT