ADVERTISEMENT

School budget gets OK

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Wednesday, October 24, 2012 - 8:15 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

The Janesville School Board did as expected Tuesday, shifting funds from its reserves to balance the 2012-13 budget.

Also as expected, the board approved the school property tax levy of $36.07 million, a decrease of about 1.9 percent from last year.

Taxes on an average house valued at $112,000 will be $18 less than last year, officials said, although that estimate is based on equalized values and does not reflect actual taxes in the various municipalities that comprise the school district.

For the full story, read Wednesday's Gazette, read online in the Gazette’s E-Edition or check back at GazetteXtra.com.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(13)
brotherkoch
Oct 24, 2012 at 8:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

As board president, let's hope that Sodemann understands how fund accounting works better than he tried to explain it. Just link that video from the finance guy where he tried to explain it to the board.

jv93
Oct 24, 2012 at 6:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

Here, I hate to cut and paste him but I'll save him the time of having to come on here and review those too slow to get it the 10th time.

On Janesville School Board eyes reserves to balance budget
Posted on October 21 at 6:56 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

wislady:

As to your question about the "fund 10" account being a "rainy day " fund. The answer is both no and yes. The fund itself is our main checking account. Because our revenue is not evenly spaced out, the fund will drop into the single digits (millions) during the year even though it will end up at its higher end on June 30th when we close out our fiscal year.

It is also our policy to maintain certain percentages (cushion amounts) in the fund balance to avoid things like short term borrowing and to cover the unexpected (boiler breaks down etc.) in both our regular operating budget and in case we have unusually high health insurance claims as we are self-insured.

So although the fund itself is not a "rainy day" fund, part of the fund balance is designed to be kept in reserve for a "rainy day" if you will.

FYI - My goal is not to change the policy just so we can spend more. To me, the existing policy does not make sense mathematically as it double counts insurance reserve needs. Although we will need to tap into our fund balance one more (this current) year due to the contracts that we have in place etc., it is my desire that any additional amount be used to fund our OPEB liability which continues to grow every year.

I hope that helps.

Sincerely,
Bill Sodemann

dtb
Oct 24, 2012 at 6:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

It would be interesting to see how much the premiums paid in versus claims paid out have been for say the last 10-20 years. It seems like this is info the taxpayers are entitled to know.

luvujvl
Oct 24, 2012 at 4:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

Here we go again. Maybe a board member could enlighten us as to the Fund 10 debate. Is $30 million the high balance? Does that occur right after property taxes or State Aid is received? Sort of like how our checkbooks have a high balance on payday, but it doesn't stay that way?

Hillman
Oct 24, 2012 at 4:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

The fund has built up over decades from literally hundreds of budget accounts from the district, and yes, the self insurance fund for all employees, not just teachers, is one of those accounts but not the only source of funds that have flowed into the account. It is also used, and there have been years this has happened, to pay for excess claims in years where health costs have exceeded budgeted revenue so that door swings both ways.

dtb
Oct 24, 2012 at 1:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

jcommon, SDJ is self insured. For several years now, the district has collected more in premiums than it has paid out in claims. This extra money ends up in Fund 10, which is basically the district's checking account which has been as high as $30 million.

brotherkoch
Oct 24, 2012 at 12:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

Knilans is susceptible. Political tools on the school board could have run against him in the primaries and been closer to their dreams of state office.

Maybe next time, Rocksolid. Something to put your $18 towards -seed money.

RichE95
Oct 24, 2012 at 11:56 a.m.
Suggest removal

Even a small tax cut must be a bitter pill for Deb Kolste. Her campaign should explain how much she would want to increase our property taxes to pay off her union supporters.

jcommon
Oct 24, 2012 at 11 a.m.
Suggest removal

LaborParty,
How are the reserves the teachers healthcare monies?
Please elaborate

vnvet7071
Oct 24, 2012 at 8:58 a.m.
Suggest removal

Oh brother !

jv93
Oct 24, 2012 at 8:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

Better to have that 18 bucks in a mothers pocket than in the teachers union coffers. Lol!

brotherkoch
Oct 24, 2012 at 8:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

Patriots, that is not your $18 since your Mom pays that property tax bill. So don't be buying more chips and donuts for the basement. Let her use it to go play bingo or something.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT