New rules could curtail Assembly debates
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Debate over the rules that govern operation of the state Assembly could trigger the first partisan fight of the legislative session.
Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said Monday one goal of the new rules is to curtail debating late into the night. The Assembly has more frequently taken votes on bills in the dark of night or even as the sun rises.
Delaying debate or votes on a bill is frequently a tactic used by the minority party. Changes to rules that would limit debate are likely to be met with fierce opposition from Democrats.
Assembly leaders were to meet Tuesday to discuss the rules changes up for debate Thursday. Vos said details of the changes would be released after that meeting.

Jan 8, 2013 at 8:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yes, and Harry Reid wants to remove the filibuster in the US Senate. The last debated bill???? Obamacare... Late into the night in the cloak of darkness.
Dems do their best work there.
Jan 8, 2013 at 7:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
This comment removed by left wing fanatics.
Jan 7, 2013 at 9:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
blisslady - of all the people to tell others to tell others to get facts straight. You are one of the biggest posters of false information out here...let me restate that. Sorry, please leave out the "one of" in my last statement. The bottom line is that the Republicans cannot allow fair play and honest debate or they would cease to exist. No intelligent person would ever buy what they are trying to sell.
I see I forgot the link so here it is:
http://www.merkley.senate.gov/newsroom/p...
Jan 7, 2013 at 9:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
MikeF
Sounds reasonable.
fordfan
The purpose is NOT to stop debate, just to prevent the all night sessions, get your facts straight.
Jan 7, 2013 at 8:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
bill - here is a link to a discussion of the US Senate proposal from one of its sponsors. Different issue from what the Wisconsin Assembly is proposing. The Wisconsin proposal is to stop debate since the Republican's have complete control again (thanks to Gerrymandering that we all got the bill for - I had to pay the bill that caused me to lose my rights).
Jan 7, 2013 at 7:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Here's an idea, session automatically recesses at 8pm unless a supermajority votes to extend it...to 9pm. No additional extensions allowed. Reconvene at 10am the next day.
That should make both sides happy because it will allow the "part time" legislators to go home and eat/rest/spend time with family and it will also allow proper debate on any matter to happen. There are very, very few cases where immediate action is required and it cannot wait until morning.
Jan 7, 2013 at 7:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
I see the usual partisans objecting to this rule change. A few more will weigh in soon, no doubt.
I could swear I saw some of these same people saying that the Democrats in the U.S. Senate should change the rules to curtail debates there. (I.E.- the filibuster) Our local partisan Democrats, not unlike the national type, are proving once again that in their opinion of what fairness is, what's good for the goose should be prohibited to the gander.
Jan 7, 2013 at 6:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Mouse....caps lock key off please. No need to scream like a child. It's "their" bank accounts, not "there" bank accounts. You're welcome:)
Jan 7, 2013 at 6:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
Badgerlvr......They will probably be saying the same things as they did when the Democrats were pushing the same sort of things when they had control of the state's government.........don't you think?
Jan 7, 2013 at 5:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
"curtailing debate late into the night"
NOT "curtailing debate".
Jan 7, 2013 at 5:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
this was OK when the Repubs were the minority, but now the Dems are the minority, and the Repubs want it changed...first the redistricting, now this...what's next? I really wish they would all punch a time clock...
Jan 7, 2013 at 5:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
I don't remember them allowing debate anyway. It was all decided in caucus.
Jan 7, 2013 at 4:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Try as they may, Conservatives won't be in power forever. I wonder what they'll say when the shoe is on the other foot?
Jan 7, 2013 at 3:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Maybe it they were in session more than 50 some days a year this wouldn't be a problem.
Jan 7, 2013 at 3:33 p.m.
Jan 7, 2013 at 3:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
coyote When it benefits them and is not a benefit to others of course they like it. Again they push the agenda that benefits them
Jan 7, 2013 at 3:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
And they say conservatives don't like change.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.