Sen. Ron Johnson will seek re-election
MILWAUKEE—U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson says he plans to seek re-election in 2016.
Some Republicans have speculated the senator who calls himself a ‘citizen legislator’ might only serve one term.
But, Johnson said on WTMJ radio that he feels his vote will be needed on bipartisan solutions to the nation’s fiscal problems. The Republican senator says there aren’t enough people in Washington willing to “take those tough votes.”
The Hill capital newspaper reports Johnson told a group of Republican strategists in Washington, D.C., that he’s started fundraising for a second run.

Mar 16, 2013 at 3:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Why don't Johnson and Ryan spend a year studying countries that are set up on free market, small government principles, like Chadd, the Sudan and Haiti, for example, before they try to bring their philosophy to the United States? See how well it works in those countries, than we'll try it out nationally in 2016.
Mar 12, 2013 at 6:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Throw the bum out. He is just as worthless as Ryan.
Mar 12, 2013 at 6:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
I wonder how many times Johnson will have to be proven that what he claims to be facts are in fact "NON facts"?
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/03...
Mar 12, 2013 at 3:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
Panamared: I had nothing against Feingold. Just happened to prefer someone else.
Mar 12, 2013 at 3:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
Vote them all out
Mar 12, 2013 at 3:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
" His actions have hurt many Wisconsin citizens."
I love hearing people say that politicians hurt citizens as though citizens do not have control of their futures. A true testament of a liberal plagued with a welfare mentality.
Mar 12, 2013 at 3:13 p.m.
Mar 12, 2013 at 2:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gosh booch11 and usaret, based on your criteria Fiengold was also doing a fantastic job.
Mar 12, 2013 at 2:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Comparing Obama with Johnson? That qualifies for a trip to Hanity's show. Get real!
Mar 12, 2013 at 2:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'm supporting anyone for Senate who will vote against the Obama party line - assuming Homeland Security (now armed with 1.6 billion rounds of pistol ammo, FULLY automatic "personal defense weapons", mine-proof armored cars, and Predator drones) is going to allow a Federal election in 2016.
Mar 12, 2013 at 1:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hillary tore him a new one? Because he asked for answers and her reply was they are dead so what does it matter if it was demonstation due to a video (was not) or was a group of guys out for a walk that decided to kill some Americans (it was not). It was a planned terrorist attack on the 10th anniversary of 9/11/01 for which we were ill prepared. Yet you give her a pass for saying maybe it was some guys out for a walk ???? I do not support Johnson and did support Hillary but can never again after that flippant response. Could not even admit after all those weeks that it was a planned terrorist attack. Guys out for a walk ????
Mar 12, 2013 at 1:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
"From the day I ran for this office last year -- er, four years ago, it seems like just last year -- I've always said change takes more than one term, one president, one party," Obama said at a fundraiser in Milwaukee.
Hmm the hypocrisy of the left shows through again.
Mar 12, 2013 at 1:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
"He is worthless and stupid and has done nothing.
He is as dumb as it gets. He sure is not what we want in Wisconsin to represent us. He is forever getting made fun of for being so stupid."
---------
please tell me that you didn't vote for Obama then. If you did you are currently the biggest hypocrite on this site!
Mar 12, 2013 at 1:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
Feingold only lost because of political momentum. I could agree that the ACA caused Feingold to lose the election, but it wouldn't have mattered even if Feingold did vote against it. The Democratic base was asleep in 2010, and the Republican/TEA Party base was fired up. In fact, 2010 was almost definitely the peak of the TEA Party.
Mar 12, 2013 at 1:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
Feingold's vote for Obamacare cost him dearly.
Mar 12, 2013 at 12:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
There is no way he won against Feingold honestly. Something fishy there. He is worthless and stupid and has done nothing.
He is as dumb as it gets. He sure is not what we want in Wisconsin to represent us. He is forever getting made fun of for being so stupid.
Mar 12, 2013 at 12:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Working for all? That's rich....
Name me ONE piece of legislation that HE has sponsored that DIRECTLY benefits the average citizen. Something he has done legislatively that enhances the lives of individual constituents as opposed to his corporate puppet-masters.
Mar 12, 2013 at 11:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
Sen. Johnson must be doing something right if there based on the comments here. That means he working for all instead of the select few like most of the other side does.
Mar 12, 2013 at 11:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
Judging by the vitriol, it appears Senator Johnson is doing a fantastic job.
Mar 12, 2013 at 11:02 a.m.
Suggest removal
I hope the Democrats have a strong opponent for Johnson, so he gets OUT of office. His actions have hurt many Wisconsin citizens...and he failed to work on resolving the budget crisis
Mar 12, 2013 at 10:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
he is a dummy hiliary tore him a new one on the benghazi issue he found a new job so now he has lobbyist up his hiney just pulling the strings he is not for the people of wisconsin or even the USA he is for he $$$$$$$$$
Mar 12, 2013 at 10:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
So much for a "citizen legislator". Welcome to professional politics! Not even half way through the first term and declaring candidacy for a second term. Nice.
Mar 12, 2013 at 10:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
If Wisconsinites have any sense, they won't elect him again. Hopefully our vote will send the Koch Brothers and the WMC packing.
Mar 12, 2013 at 9:47 a.m.
Mar 12, 2013 at 9:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
Now here's a guy who has a great thing going. Getting paid to do NOTHING! One of the two stupidest people from Wisconsin in Washington. Please Wisconsin, we can do better than this loser.
Mar 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
The puppet "elects" to wear the "big money" strings.
Mar 12, 2013 at 9:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Interesting that these guys are all about term limits, self imposed or otherwise, until they actually get in office. Then they're so indispensable to the survival of our democracy and our way of life that they just have to stay . . . and stay . . . and stay . . . .
[Interesting too, of course, when newspapers endorse the idea of terms limits but then keep endorsing their favorites for reelection year after year after year.]
Mar 12, 2013 at 9:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
He does not deserve his present term. He along with many is not worthy of another term.
Mar 12, 2013 at 8:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
He has done SO much to make us proud. Let's start with his vote AGAINST the Violence Against Women Act. We can also thank him for his vote AGAINST our veterans. Don't forget how, after his election, the company he runs gave him a $10 Million 'bonus'--which just happened to correspond to what he spent on his campaign (it would have been illegal for his company to make a $10 Million donation to his campaign--I guess us "dumbed-down" citizens (HIS words) aren't smart enough to make THAT connection). Yes, let's re-elect this guy.
Mar 12, 2013 at 8:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
...and just what does Senator Johnson thinks merits him another term?
Mar 12, 2013 at 8:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
It will give me great pleasure to vote for anyone who runs against this worst Wisconsin Senator since (and maybe including) Senator McCarthy. He is a true embarrassment to the great State of Wisconsin.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.