You liberals/right-wingers won’t print my letter

By GREG PECK ( Contact )   Thursday, October 14, 2010 - 3:36 p.m.

When I attended the National Conference of Editorial Writers convention in Little Rock two years ago, one of my favorite colleagues turned out to be Dick Hughes, editorial page editor of the Statesman Journal in Salem, Oregon.

He attended this year’s conference in Dallas and just wrote a column that begins this way:

“Three newspaper editorial writers go into a Texas bar.

“The first editorial writer is from Texas. He says: ‘Most of our readers are conservative, so most letters we publish are from conservatives. They still think we’re biased against them.’

“The second editorial writer is from Iowa. He says: ‘Most of our readers are liberal, so most letters we publish are from liberals. They still think we’re biased against them.’

“The third editorial writer is from Oregon. He says: ‘Our readers are conservatives, liberals, in the middle and at both ends, so we publish a mix of letters. They all think we’re biased against them.’

“If you’re looking for more of a punchline, sorry. There is none.”

I can identify. Janesville and surrounding communities have traditionally been heavily unionized, and unions favor Democrats, so the majority of our letters continue to be from liberals. Despite what you might think, however, we’ll print your letter regardless of political ideology, as long as we don’t question its factual accuracy, it meets our 250-word limit and you include your full name, address and phone number. And this time of year, letters endorsing one candidate or another are flowing in fast and furiously.

What about printing letters of conspiracy theorists? Here’s more from Hughes:

“We editorial writers discussed whether to continue publishing letters from so-called birthers—people who assert that President Obama is not a U.S. citizen or that he was born in Kenya instead of Hawaii.

“That claim is patently false. It’s been debunked by Snopes.com and numerous media organizations. Even if Obama were born in Kenya (which he wasn’t), he’d still be a U.S. citizen because his mother was a U.S. citizen and made her permanent home in the U.S.

“Some people believe otherwise. Do we publish their letters, even though all the facts indicate they’re untrue? Do we publish letters claiming that U.S. government was behind 9/11, even though there’s not a shred of factual evidence to support that rumor?

“Although we publish several thousand letters each year, we don’t have room for all of them. We have to make choices. If I weed out those conspiracy-theory letters, am I biased or am I being responsible?”

Gazette Editor Scott Angus and I are leaning more heavily toward rejecting such letters all the time. After all, simply by publishing conspiracy theories, we might lead some gullible people to believe they’re true. By doing so, then, we’re helping spread falsehoods.

Greg Peck can be reached at (608) 755-8278 or gpeck@gazettextra.com. Or follow him on Twitter

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(8)
dini79
Oct 15, 2010 at 10:21 a.m.
Suggest removal

Although it's clear from Gazette editorials, especially around election time, that the company leans pretty hard to the right, I will attest that this leaning does not affect which letters are published or not in the Gazette, as long as you follow their editorial policy (read before sending; it involves common sense things like word count and profanity). I've even known them to send back letters that are too long to a young person who wanted to have a voice on a local issue, to be edited for length. I don't think they agreed with the letter. But Greg wanted to see to it that a young person felt validated in participating in civic life. I have more than my share of complaints about the Gazette. This is not one.

Hockeyjockey
Oct 15, 2010 at 8:43 a.m.
Suggest removal

On the one hand, I can't believe you would even consider printing letters containing items you know to be false.
On the other hand, one can pretty much say anything one wants regardless of factuality in the comments section of your web site, so what's the difference?

meh
Oct 15, 2010 at 7:38 a.m.
Suggest removal

I agree about not printing out letters that are debunked as there are a lot of people who will believe everything they read, hear etc. I am amazed anyone would believe these TV ads that are on now. My goodness, I gave up watching TV until the election is done. It seems like all the commercials are political ones. Talk about overload.

janesvillean
Oct 14, 2010 at 4:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

Hughes should have written that the birth certificate claims have been debunked by the elected Governor of Hawaii, who is a Republican.

Matt__Gaboda
Oct 14, 2010 at 4:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

I've always been happy with what you have and have not printed of mine. From a personal standpoint, I've had many letters rejected for one reason or another. After reading your reasoning, I've agreed with you. Good work.

sannio
Oct 14, 2010 at 4:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

If you don't have room for all the letters, why not randomly pick several. If a letter meets your _basic_ criteria, print it. If not, randomly choose another.
What if someone printed a letter saying the Milky Way galaxy was square? Would you think it was too bizarre to print?
It's really square...
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arx...

lachanceg
Oct 14, 2010 at 3:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

My take on this:
Most readers are capable of distilling information from the 'out there' contributors.
You already separate most of the political endorsement letters from your other letters to the editors. Maybe you create a here's your forum - but we're not sure what to make of it section as well.
At least they're signed, unlike the sound off (which is still a pretty good read).

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT