Will new cellphone ban make difference?

By GREG PECK ( Contact )   Thursday, November 1, 2012 - 1:03 p.m.

I turned off Parker Place and headed up Court Street hill in Janesville on Wednesday just as a batch of traffic approached. A woman driving an SUV quickly pulled even with me, and I noticed she had her face focused on her cellphone. As I drove alongside, she continued to spend more time looking at the miniature screen than the road. It appeared obvious she was texting in violation of state law rather than just dialing a phone number.

The ban on texting while operating a moving vehicle has been in effect nearly two years, but patrol officers find it difficult to figure out if a driver is making a call or texting. The law has resulted in few tickets.

A new state law taking effect today bans cellphone use for drivers with instructional permits or probationary licenses and those who’ve had licenses reinstated after revocations or suspensions. A story in today’s Gazette says it also covers new state residents who are younger than 21 or have less than three years of experience and also drivers licensed in other countries.

The question is, how will patrol officers—other than those parked around schools as teenagers are leaving—know whether the drivers they’re observing fall into any of these categories? This will be difficult, as well.

Isn’t this just another state law that won’t have much effect? If lawmakers really want to make a difference, wouldn’t they ban all drivers from using mobile devices while handling moving vehicles?

Greg Peck can be reached at (608) 755-8278 or gpeck@gazettextra.com. Or follow him on Twitter or Facebook

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(14)
starbuck
Nov 3, 2012 at 9:02 a.m.
Suggest removal

I got hit at an eastside intersection some time back by a driver talking on a cell phone. The person had kids in the back of their vehicle with no seat belts or restrainer seats on either. Needless to say my vehicle was badly damaged and they got arrested for inattenitive driving. I can say I wish the laws were stricter and fines more excessive.

Hizzoner
Nov 2, 2012 at 11:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

Greg appears to have admitted to "inattentive driving."

Should the police just mail him a citation?

mgcarguy
Nov 2, 2012 at 6:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

Greg, If you were watching the lady driving next to you, who was watching the road for you? For you to know that she was watching her phone more than she was watching the road, you would have had to watch her a lot. I think everyone should keep their eyes on the road at all times while driving unless they have their dog sitting on their lap or they are shaving while drinking a cup of coffee and tuning the radio or leaning over the seat to converse with the people in the back seat.

billnewbie
Nov 1, 2012 at 9:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

That's right, Janesvillean. This law seems to be yet another attempt to make plea bargaining easier. Now they can throw still another charge onto the pile that will never end up on anyone's conviction record. That is, of course unless the D.A's office is feeling particularly gracious (or late for a tee time), in which case this new charge may be the only one left standing after all the horse trading is said and done.

Justice by haggle. Where expediting the judicial process trumps the quest of holding the guilty accountable and vindicating the innocent. The more plentiful the charges, the easier it is to get stubborn people who won't admit (or don't accept) their guilt to minimize their potential losses should they exercise their right to a jury trial, in which case all the charges will be on the docket. And if the truly guilty get a better deal than they deserve? Oh well, cez la vie as the French say. Or as President Kennedy once said, "Life is unfair". That also applies to the innocent who are intimidated by the D.A.'s office with its description of the prospects of losing in court.

Sigma40
Nov 1, 2012 at 9:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

Fines have lost their merit and are much more ineffective than they once were. Why? Because taking money from someone doesnt hurt them, they can simply go to the bank and get a small loan and pay it off over time....essentially making the punishment and thought of the fine non-existent. Or like someone on my facebook that has to pay off a fine so they are selling food stamps at half off.

li713
Nov 1, 2012 at 9:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

Law makers have determined that using a cell phone while driving is dangerous, but the police are regularly operating a laptop while driving. Whoever decided that was the best system is a moron.

janesvillean
Nov 1, 2012 at 5:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

frogger, the law provides for a range of fines depending on whether it is the first or second/subsequent offense within one year. This is, however, likely to always be an additional charge on top of a standard distracted driving charge; as it is difficult to prove it might end up being dismissed as part of a plea bargain.
http://handsfreeinfo.com/wisconsin-cell-...
.
jocose, administrative offenses like that aren't always worth the cops' time. When they are "tailgating" you they are probably running your plates to see if there is any other good reason to pull you over. Many other traffic laws are assumed to be only enforced when their violation leads to an accident. I don't think there's much point to turning our police department into traffic wardens, shadowing everyone for the slightest violation.

frogger
Nov 1, 2012 at 4:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

ON the Madsison news last night they said fine $20-$40. In this paper's article it says $185. I hope it is $185 that seems like it could "hurt" more than $20.

jocose
Nov 1, 2012 at 3:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

mteg- well said. I see so many cars with no tags displayed on the front of their cars. The police don't seem to care. I have seen so many cars with objects hanging from their rear view mirrors. The police don't care. (One did in Madison and gave my daughter a ticket for obstructed vision a few years ago.) I saw a squad car follow a car through a red light with 2 more behind him on Centerway. The police don't care. This town is full of people who just don't care. If you do the speed limit, the police, along with everyone else, will tailgate you. What's going on???

frogger
Nov 1, 2012 at 2:53 p.m.
Suggest removal

Kids wont listen and neither will adults. It is Me me me. I saw a person taking up my side of the road because she was on the phone and couldn't turn as tightly using one hand.

janesvillecomments
Nov 1, 2012 at 2:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

Greg, I'll call you if I see any drivers on their cell phone while I'm out driving. ☺

Sigma40
Nov 1, 2012 at 2:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

They are thinking we the people will think they are trying to help do something to justify the cost of having them.
-
But wow... I made it out to lunch today and didnt get hit by anyone, it must really work. Great job law makers!! You saved me today!!

mteg
Nov 1, 2012 at 2:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

Ho bout they pass legislation that forces the Police Department to enforce the current laws we have in place?

Coppertop
Nov 1, 2012 at 1:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

The current cell phone ban is a total joke. What are the lawmakers thinking? Greg, I ask the same thing that everybody else ask... how does this get enforced? Only way to ban this is to make it unlawful to have any cell phones or electronic device in drivers hand any time the motor is running if you ask me.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT