What to make of Walker’s casino stance

By GREG PECK ( Contact )   Thursday, March 7, 2013 - 4:02 p.m.

How do you explain the stance on new casinos that Gov. Scott Walker took last week? Walker, who supports most anything to foster economic development and job creation, said any of the 11 Wisconsin tribes could veto any off-reservation casino proposal.

The tribes must agree by “consensus,” he said. That, he told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, “doesn’t mean 10 ‘yes’ and one ‘no.’ Consensus means everybody says ‘yes.’”

Jon Greendeer, president of the Ho-Chunk Nation, which is trying to build such a casino in Beloit, was miffed.

“I’d like to see how Kwik Trip would respond if BP had to agree to every new Kwik Trip gas station,” he told the Journal Sentinel.

We’ll share our perspectives on this development in our editorial Friday.

Greg Peck can be reached at (608) 755-8278 or gpeck@gazettextra.com. Or follow him on Twitter or Facebook

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(29)
JohnWicket
Mar 10, 2013 at 4:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

Does anyone remember Tommy Thompson and the dog track "enhancement" program? I bet that made a great deal of money with which we supported our public schools. It seems that political memories are short and convenient, depending upon which side one supports.

wislady
Mar 10, 2013 at 12:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

MooShoo

It worked for Doyle.

JohnWicket
Mar 9, 2013 at 3:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'll bet that gambling is a risky development plan. But I'll still see you at the casino, I enjoy the company of other losers.

imbkay13
Mar 8, 2013 at 8:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

Just like the cooperation with our Wisconsin Legislature.

wislady
Mar 8, 2013 at 6:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

janesvillean

"Gazette editorial today pretty much agrees with my assessment"

Both are opinions, and we all have one. As far "pubic opinion", wasn't there a statewide referendum in 1993, when the majority of the state did not want an increase in gambling in Wisconsin?

janesvillecomments stated...
"The tribes are in competition with each other"

It makes perfect sense that the tribes should come to some type of agreement BEFORE Walker makes a final decision.

I don't believe Walker has made a final decision , first the Feds have to give the go ahead. He did list some criteria he would like to see before he would approve a new casino, as listed in the article below.

Walker: Casino needs all tribes’ support

http://www.kenoshanews.com/news/walker_c...

I would like to see a casino open in Beloit, but I don't get to make the decision. I am sure Ms. Klett would like to see some jobs come to her home town of Beloit, we all would. The Potawatomi need to start compromising, but it seems they are unwilling to even talk with the others. You can blame Walker if you want, but cooperation must come from the tribes first, if they want more gaming.

janesvillean
Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

wislady, I don't know what points you're trying to score here, except it looks like you want to run to teacher and claim I pushed you on the playground at recess. It's pretty much the only comeback you have -- changing the subject, pretending your opponent has an inconsistent position, and waving your hands furiously to distract from the real issues. If you were on a school debate team, they would have ejected you out of embarrassment.
.
Walker's position here makes very little sense and you have done nothing to refute that. The Gazette editorial today pretty much agrees with my assessment. Even Walker's own tourism secretary, Rock County's own Stephanie Klett, advocated for the casino, but he sure threw her under the bus on that one. Walker has a responsibility to come clean about the basis for his illogical position, or open up the process to a public decision.

wislady
Mar 8, 2013 at 12:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

reader101

It was very obvious the "special" connection Doyle had with the tribes. One person went to jail over the money laundering that was done to get the casino approved. Doyle should have been on trial also.

woody
The aquatic center is still there, hopefully under better management.

http://www.whitewateraquatic.com/

reader101
Mar 8, 2013 at 12:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

This is again part of Walker's plan to divide and conquer. Only this time it is the tribes. He is not on very good terms with the Northern tribes right now.

woody
Mar 8, 2013 at 10:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

"even Whitewater has an aquatic center"
.
You mean the one that went broke? Good one wisslady, just what jville needs, another money pit.

shaiajean
Mar 8, 2013 at 9:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

Walker supports most anything to foster economic development and job creation? Please. He has a terrible track record. Track, get it? Think of the economic boom to the State and all of the jobs that would have been created if he had not rejected federal funds for the light rail system.

wislady
Mar 8, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

The tribes have been fighting for more casinos for many years, this is nothing new. They were allowed to expand when they paid Doyle off. There should have been a John Doe into that scandal and money laundering, Troha isn't the only one who should have been convicted.

wislady
Mar 8, 2013 at 7:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

Bowlgal

I agree. It is amazing that for all the money Janesville spends on ice arenas and ball fields, the city can not figure out how to have a water park, even Whitewater has an aquatic center. I enjoy casino visits (especially during the winter), and it would be nice to have a facility closer than an hour drive. A lot of families head to the Dells for the water parks, so if the Beloit project included a nice water park, that would be a real plus.

Having the tribes arrive at a consensus is a good start.

wislady
Mar 8, 2013 at 7:17 a.m.
Suggest removal

janesvillean

You must have hated Doyle and his sleazy tactics.

Remember the scandal involving Dennis Troha (a large Doyle contributor) and the developer of the Menominee casino in Kenosha? Troha and 12 of his family members were donating to Doyles 2002 and 2006 campaigns, in exchange for support for gaming and the relaxing of trucking restrictions. Troha was convicted of money laundering.

Then, he transferred 200 Million from the Wisconsin Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund to the state’s general fund. the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in 2010, that transferring the money was ILLEGAL and it was ordered to be paid back (which Governor Walker did).

So, tell us more about transparency.

Bowlgal
Mar 8, 2013 at 7:08 a.m.
Suggest removal

But will add, I am for a Beloit Casino with hotel and convention center that would mirror the Wis. Dells facility.

Bowlgal
Mar 8, 2013 at 7:07 a.m.
Suggest removal

I need more to this story then one line pulled from an article with no link. For now, keeping an open mind and my opinion to myself.

janesvillean
Mar 8, 2013 at 5:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

wislady, you are the one with the reflexive politics that supports Walker in every single way. What I am against is decision-making being behind closed doors and centralized in an office whose resident has shown that he has no interest in consulting with citizens. If Walker were to open up this process and give it to a blue ribbon committee or handle it normally through existing offices that would be an entirely different story.
.
The issue is not that I dislike what Walker "decides". The issue is that, bizarrely, Walker is the one and the only one making this decision. It's the opposite of Wisconsin political tradition. It's like the entire rest of the state government has ceased to exist except insofar as a tool to advance what Walker wants.
.
Really, can you explain to me in simple terms why he has made this decision? It has no public history of comment or discussion. He has just decreed something. I expect the decision is as opaque to you as to anyone else who is not named Scott Walker.

IndyColtFan
Mar 8, 2013 at 5:11 a.m.
Suggest removal

He is obviously against it!

woody
Mar 7, 2013 at 11:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

So, being that the tribes are going to fight the mining bill, this is his payback to get tough with them? Maybe if the tribes didn't have the money making casinos, they wouldn't have money to hire lawyers? Is that it, scooter?

BostonBill
Mar 7, 2013 at 10:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Line my pockets." Quote unknown.

illdrinktothat
Mar 7, 2013 at 9:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

It's like saying any voter can veto Scooters governorship....hey, wait a minute...I kinda like THAT.

How' bout it Scooter? Do you really feel that good about it?

Didn't think so hypocrite.

wislady
Mar 7, 2013 at 8:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

janesvillean

Whichever way Walker would chose, you would dislike it. Now, he is saying the tribes should decide on the casinos, and you don't like that.

janesvillecomments
Mar 7, 2013 at 8 p.m.
Suggest removal

The tribes are in competition with each other. If Governor Walker has to arbitrate a solution, it will be a lot of time-consuming work with 11 different groups that have special Federal status. It's almost a guarantee that not everyone will be happy with whatever solution or compromise he might come up with and he might wind up in court over it.

This way, he saves a lot of his and state employees time and effort, and whatever consensus the tribes reach, the tribes can't blame him for the results.

It's like the solution a Mother would use for dividing up the last of a cake or pie between two kids. If mom cuts the dessert up, no matter how evenly she divides it, one or both kids might complain about the other getting the bigger piece. If she tells one kid to slice it and the other kid gets 1st pick, they can't complain to Mom - it was their own choices.

nemesis
Mar 7, 2013 at 7:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

Casino's and the lottery are merely taxes on people who are bad at math.

tthompson
Mar 7, 2013 at 5:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

Is everything ok Greg?? You AGAIN hold down every single spot for the 'community' bloggers only this time 3 of them don't end with a question mark. Anyways, I hope all is well.

janesvillean
Mar 7, 2013 at 5:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

In Wisconsin, this would have been decided by consultation with the tribes, public hearings, and participation by our elected legislators. In Wississippi, Walker just decides.

Badgerlvr
Mar 7, 2013 at 4:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

Could it be that the eleven tribes haven't contributed to Walker's campaign fund? Or could it be that only one contributed and this is his payback?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT