Have you considered cutting the cord?
In recent years, I have become tired of cable television’s rising costs, inflexibility and spotty service. These are not uncommon complaints. According to one report, more than 400,000 American homes have cut the cord and gotten rid of their cable or satellite television service in 2012. That’s a big number. A lot of us are frustrated at the escalating costs of subscription TV and are unhappy with the hundreds of channels we rarely, if ever, watch.
A colleague of mine at The Gazette, copy editor Andrew Reuter, recently took the leap and dropped cable. I am keenly interested to see how it goes for him. Watch for his updates on the process on PopCon.
At the dawn of my reporting career in the 1970s, I had the chance to cover public negotiations for cable television franchises. I thought it was a very exciting time. This new industry was boasting that it would offer 18 or 20 channels of television instead of the five or six we had at the time in the Milwaukee area. The cost was about $15 a month as I recall, but some officials worried that once the company got the cable franchise, the rates would grow. The franchises generally lasted 20 years and were basically a monopoly. Consumers at the time didn’t have access to the options we have now.
Those officials were right to worry.
In 2005, the average cable bill was $43.04, according to a 2009 FCC report. My bill indicates that I pay $65 a month for cable, and that price includes several incentives that supposedly reduce the cost.
But the relevant question here is how much television do you watch? Does that time justify what you have to spend?
I use my television primarily to watch movies and sports. I have a large library of my own films and favorite television shows. In addition, I have an Apple TV and a ROKU player. Both of these devices allow me to stream content from Internet services.
For that $65 per month, I use the television about two hours a day to watch TV programming. Some days I use it more and some days I never turn the device on. That means I pay a little more than $2 per day for that cable television connection. At first, that doesn’t seem so expensive. But if I look at it as almost $800 per year, well, now that cost gets my attention.
Aside from sports, I cannot remember the last show I watched on network television on a regular basis. I used to watch "60 Minutes," but now I work at that time on Sundays. I used to watch "Fringe." My work schedule knocks that out as well. I use my cable service to watch sports, a few video-on-demand items and the occasional guilty-pleasure reality show about ice-road semitrailer truck drivers or lumberjacks.
Realistically, I can change those habits. I can watch "60 Minutes" on my computer. Likewise, I can obtain "Fringe" episodes from iTunes or Amazon.com. In fact, virtually all shows are available from iTunes, Amazon or some other service.
The challenge if I cut the cord is twofold: replacing sports and the one premium channel that I really enjoy, HBO.
To a growing, extent sports can be obtained through streaming services. If I get a good digital antenna, I should be able to get local stations, which carry a lot of the sports events, on my television. And, lucky for me, HBO shows are available at iTunes.
Whether cable companies acknowledge it or not, the age of a la carte television is here. I don’t want 600 channels. I want the 10 channels or so that I actually plan to watch. The rest are just clutter. In a 1992 song, Bruce Springsteen noted he had “57 Channels (And Nothin’ On).” The only thing that has changed is that now we have hundreds of channels.
What’s stopping me from dropping cable? I really don’t know. This reluctance probably has something to do with Newton’s three laws of motion, but my brain is just too furry to understand. The fact is, I could use my television exclusively to watch movies and streaming content. I could use my computer to get news and sports and, to be honest, it would do me some good to turn the damn box off. I could read, walk, listen to audiobooks, listen to my giant music library or write.
Next time my agreement with Charter ends and my monthly price jumps, the company has every right to be very nervous.
Have you considered cutting the cord on cable television? How much TV do you watch? Do you use Netflix, Amazon Prime or another streaming service? Share your opinions about cutting the cord with us.
Follow Shawn Sensiba on Twitter @shawnsensiba.


Aug 20, 2012 at 10:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
this has been very educational for me. I despise charter, which is what I have and have had for years. I'm sick to death of them trying to push their landline phone service on me, we don't need landline. We do watch quite a lot of tv, but only a few channels. I was really hesitant to go with uverse, that's att, and I was so delighted to get them out of my life back in the days of long distance landlines. Sounds like I need to look into this roku????
Aug 19, 2012 at 11:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
When I was ready to revamp the services I pay for - I created a spreadsheet with all of the services and their prices today and after the new subscriber bonuses expired...
Television: Charter, U-Verse, DirecTv, Dish
Internet: Charter, U-Verse
Landline Phone: Charter, U-Verse, Vonage
After I crunched all the numbers and did it both with and without bundling costs, I came to these conclusions:
1. Bundling is a great incentive for the new subscriber and not a deal for those who stick with a bundle after the honeymoon is over.
2. Unless you like rewiring your network, phones, and TV every year or two - look beyond the new customer discount. Look at the customer service reputations, quality of service, and rate increases over the last few years.
3. Every area - even different neighborhoods in Janesville - has different pricing schemes. Areas that charter competes with U-Verse are cheaper than areas that have no competition. Yeah, seems shady doesn't it?
4. In my area I got DirecTv for television, Charter 30Mbps internet, and Vonage for my landline which I plan to keep until my kids are old enough to get their own cells.
In two years, I'll be back crunching the same numbers and evaluating switching again... I have no loyalty to any company, I'm out for #1 and trying not to step in #2.
Aug 19, 2012 at 11:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
I haven't had cable in 5 years and couldn't be happier. I have Netflix so if I'm in the mood for TV or a movie I'm good for only $10/month. Cable companies are insane, why would I want to pay the price to watch Tv just to have to watch commericals or channels I don't want so their companies can blow half their revenue on advertising as much as possible. It's stupid. I wish I had a enough money to start a cable company and only charge you for the channels you want to have. I have no use of the spanish or god channels.
Aug 19, 2012 at 10:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
havent had pay tv in years , we stream netflex and hulu , and the antenna pulls in a ton of channel s, the sports is the only thing we have issues with .
Aug 19, 2012 at 7:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
I have two words for you: ROKU and NETFLIX!
If you already have internet sevice, you buy the tiny Roku box at Walmart for under 100.00 and you can get loads of news and tv AND MUSIC! Get the netflix option for about 8.00 a month and there are loads of great tv: kids shows, documentaries, popular stuff---with NO COMMERCIALS! LOVE IT!
Aug 19, 2012 at 3:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'll be making the call tomorrow.
Aug 19, 2012 at 11:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
We went from extended basic to basic cable in 2000. In 2005 we dropped the cable altogether and used rabbit ears and then a digital converter. In February our TV turned 20 years old..then it decided it was done. We didn't replace it. We have 5 kids and it is rarely missed. They watch dvds on the computer occasionally.
Aug 19, 2012 at 11:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
paying to watch informercials seem like a waste to me. I have netflix and go to the redbox for a movie now and then. Get around 10 local channels in hd off a tower antenna so thats more that enough tv for me and the kids.
Aug 19, 2012 at 10:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
They should have pay by channel. Only pay for the few channels you watch, and not the thousands you don't watch
Aug 18, 2012 at 10:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
Lets hope free tv stays free. Here is a article about Rupert Murdoch threating free tv in dec 2009.
.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/29...
Aug 18, 2012 at 9:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
I dumped satellite over a year ago. We just watch Netflix on TV now. $9 a month vs $50 is a no brainer. We have the internet so we don't need to wait for local news. National news too. We haven't missed anything of any importance.
Aug 18, 2012 at 5:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
We have not had cable or even TVs in our home for many years. We donated the then newer TVs to anyone who wanted them. Many did not want them because they did not have flat screens and this happened when those first came out. People sure can be picky with free. We also have no land line or internet at home. Those are at the office so our time at home is our own with the exception of our cellphones.
We also have a rule of not talking, texting or answering our cell phones in a moving vehicle unless someone answers for us.
We spend our time with family, reading, talking to each other, volunteering, and working in our business. We receive several newspapers at our house(including the Gazette) and view others on line so we get a variety of thoughts and viewpoints. Do we miss the TVs occasionally for a special movie or event - only occasionally. Most sports are available at various locations in town, including smart phones for free.
Aug 18, 2012 at 12:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
Have not had cable for many years, and only occasionally miss it when I hear about something on cable that I would watch. It is unaffordable at this time.
So we use an indoor antenna for broadcast stations, but we watch more stuff from the internet, mostly Netflix.
Aug 18, 2012 at 11:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
We really should get together and boycott cable and satellite TV until they get the rates under control. Our Government did a good thing by giving us network stations in HD over the airwaves for free. I'm surprised that more people have not invested in a decent antenna -- they don't cost much.
Aug 18, 2012 at 10:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Did years ago - pay for all that garbage? What a relief. You're welcome to support it, but not me!
It's not like gas...you don't need it to get to work and around town! If most everyone dropped it for 3-6 months, I imagine they might have to figure out a way to reduce the prices and improve the quality.
Aug 18, 2012 at 8:50 a.m.
Suggest removal
Have been without cable for about two months and wondered how I would survive at the beginning but I find, like the others, I don't miss it at all. My TV is used for DVDs and my computer is handy for catching viral clips of shows here and there (like Donald Driver on DWTS.) In fact, it's better. I didn't have to sit through anyone else! Now going without Internet??? That's a horse of a different color.
Aug 18, 2012 at 7:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
Do it the old fashioned way. With a TV antenna. Why pay for something that is (nearly) free?
Aug 17, 2012 at 11:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
I dropped Charter's TV (but kept their Internet) and went with DirecTV. I've had more weather-related satellite reception outages than I ever had with Charter's cable service.
I'm debating Uverse when my contract is up, but will jump to the first provider of a la carte channel subscriptions( even if I pay a penalty to do so). I know that will drop the income stream of the provider that offers individual channel selection, but they will be able to negotiate their upstream costs when some formerly bundled channels see a serious drop in subscribers once people can choose NOT to subscribe to a bunch of premium channels to be able to watch one channel. I'm on DirecTV's choice plan - $150 channels, and nothing worth watching (or watching a second time) right now.
Aug 17, 2012 at 10:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
We cut the cable over a year ago and went with Netflix and Huluplus on the Roku. And now our phones, wii, and kindle all stream them too. Do I miss network television? Not really. Never watched much sports to begin with. I do miss the history channel, but that's about it. With Netflix my 4 year old can pick her own cartoons to watch, and we have Huluplus for most of the shows we watch on Abc, Nbc and Fox. We don't get Ellen, American Idol, or America's got talent though.... Still worth saving the money though. Phone and net are $85 vs the $170 we were paying for HD receivers and extra channels that we weren't watching due to Netflix in the first place.
Aug 17, 2012 at 8:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
We cut Charter when they raised my bill $60 in one month, with no warning or increase in service....We are doing just fine without them and so are the kids
Aug 17, 2012 at 6:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
I took the plunge - I have an antenna on my garage - I get perfect reception of all the networks plus there are 3 channels for 21 and 2 for each of the others. My ever-so basic cable cost was way too high for just the networks with no extra anything. And kept going up up up all the time. It gave me great pleasure to call and cancel cable!
If I want to watch any of the HBO, AMC or any of the other cable special programs, IE "Breaking Bad", "Dexter" etc. I just go to the video store and rent them - for a FRACTION of the cost of the monthly cable YEA! Cable Free! Whoopee!
Aug 17, 2012 at 5:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Cut that cord several years ago and only miss a couple of the channels...scifi, discovery, food network and hallmark. I really don't miss it that much. Bought an anteana for $13 on closeout at Radio Shaq and I get all the Rockford & Madison channels FREE. love ME tv has all the old tv shows I use to love to watch and on Sat night Svengholie...where I can see all those old B rated movies you just don't see much of anymore...kinda fun for a change than all that so called "reality" tv.
Aug 17, 2012 at 4:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
I cut it a year ago. I put up an antenna and can pick up 40 or more over-the-air channels from Madison and Milwaukee. Best thing is, its free.
Aug 17, 2012 at 4:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
Cut mine months ago and now do what Irish Mafia does. Don't mind at all. Would probably go back if a la carte is ever offered (depending on price).
Aug 17, 2012 at 4:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Wouldn`t ever think of it. I`m retired and don`t know what I`d do without TV. As a matter of fact I just had DirecTV installed yesterday, and kept my Charter cable. I added DirecTV to watch my Colts. The NFL package was free with a 2 yr committment.
Aug 17, 2012 at 3:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
gazettefan, I don't have Charter - their top tier internet was still wonky for me after multiple fixes and 4 new routers (the signal dropped briefly every 17 minutes). I changed to ATT U-Verse. Their "Basic" is 20 local channels for ~$20 (packaged). I still save $50 a month having dropped from their 200 channel option.
Aug 17, 2012 at 2:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
I cut the cable 17 years ago when my bill went from $40 to $45 - a 12.5% increase with no increase in service and haven't missed it. I have no idea what it would cost today but it's money I'm spending elsewhere.
Aug 17, 2012 at 2:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
DTV is the way to go. With all those stations people have I always hear complaints that there is nothing on they want to watch anyway. What I hated the most when I DID have cable was that although I was paying for it, when I came home from work all that was on was infomercials. Went with free TV ever since then. I just wish there was a similar alternative for Cell Phones!!
Aug 17, 2012 at 2:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
I guess I cut the cord in 1998. We had just the cable that got the network stations and a few other things. We cancelled and have never had it since. After such a long time it is interesting to see what is on the tube these days. It is mostly offensive, demeaning, violent and basically stupid (not much different than in 1998!). I'm amazed people will hand over their hard-earned money for that. Glad it's not part of my life.
Aug 17, 2012 at 1:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Vector, I recently told Charter that I wanted to cut back from expanded basis to basic. They said that basic by itself is no longer allowed and that I had to pay 60 bucks for basic/expanded basic together; so I dropped all Charter's TV and now only have its Internet.
Let us know if they allow you to have only basic.
Aug 17, 2012 at 1:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
I took the baby step and cut back to Basic - comparatively cheap when bundled - because the U-Verse customer service rep did her job and suggested I might regret not having local stations. Sadly, when you do that the dvr is disabled, and I don't watch things on a schedule anymore, so I'll be cancelling Basic as well.
With hulu, netflix, amazon prime etc. streamed through my devices, I have more than enough to entertain me at a lower cost and on my schedule. I *do* wish that I could affordably get HBO Go without associating it with "the cord."
Aug 17, 2012 at 1:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Cut the cord a year ago and glad I did. It took a bit, but I have the moddifed rabbit ears that pick up just about every public station including all the PBS's, Me and This, 2 different music stations (country and Cool), etc... The money I saved (around $170 a month for phone internet and cable thru AT&T) is nice. Thats over $2,000 a year.
Aug 17, 2012 at 12:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Mine is like $130 a month for internet and The basic w/ a box. Im debating this as well.. could hook my PC up to it and watch anything on youtube free...eliminate cable TV and just have internet.
-
Charter just cut a lot of their free on demand stuff, a lot of on demand channels you have to pay extra for now. So the price went up and what you get got less.
I really dislike Charter, they've known about the crappy cables in my whole neighborhood for a long time they said... but dont do anything about it.
Aug 17, 2012 at 12:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
I cut off cable tv about three years ago. What I get in on the rabbit ears & TV tuner is enough for me. I get local programming and PBS. If there's anything else I want to watch, I have DVDs, Netflix and the internet.
Since I ditched digital cable, I find that I'm not scheduling my life around TV. I plan for my two hour-long programs when the new season starts but aside from that, I maybe log less than 8 hours of television a week. The local channels I get are a bit strange sometimes with all of the "retro" programming they offer, but the "CoolTV" music channel is alright because it actually airs nothing but videos.
I also like that I get three different PBS stations. One is your standard PBS with childrens shows, NOVA, documentaries, etc. Another is called the Wisconsin channel that airs history programs and Wisconsin-based educational/cultural programming. The last channel is called Create and shows cooking, travel, and craft-type shows.
I don't think you could convince me to go back to paying for TV programming.
Aug 17, 2012 at 11:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
"Have you considered cutting the cord?"
Only once every month when I write a $200 check to Charter.
Aug 17, 2012 at 11:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
I haven't had cable in 4ish years. I was only paying $25 a month for the barest minimum plan and, like you, was rarely watching it. Initially I switched to antenna and continued to watch very little TV and lots of movies from my reasonably extensive collection. I also began "collecting" TV box sets from eBay to watch. Last year I first heard about Roku and loved the idea. I got it with my tax return this year and LOVE IT! I now pay $15 a month for Hulu Plus and Netflix combined and watch it constantly. I could cancel Hulu Plus and be ok, but I'm going to wait for the fall TV season to start up before I decide for sure. At this point I haven't signed up for Amazon Prime because I calculated I would have to watch 2-3 movies per month to justify the cost and at this point I don't watch that many movies that I don't already own. Perhaps in the future. As one of the characters on Matt Damon's movie The Rainmaker says CUT CUT CUT! :)
Aug 17, 2012 at 11:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
I haven't had cable in 14 years. I haven't had any television whatsoever since the switch to digital. I don't miss it at all.
Aug 17, 2012 at 11:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
I like TV. We watch about 3 hours a night but with DVR cuts it down to 2 hours. I have a computer hooked up to the TV but this doesn't work in the bedroom. Would need another Computer I think. In winter sometime will watch HGTV all day on a sunday (vs football).
We turn in on a music station often as well. So I believe we get our monies worth. Just seems TOO HIGH. I agree lets cut the price and get to chose 50 ish fav stations.
Aug 17, 2012 at 11:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
I will be cutting the cord soon. My wife watches too many episodes of "Snapped", and I think she's starting to get ideas.
Aug 17, 2012 at 11:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
We cut the cord 3 months ago and haven't looked back. Got a good high def antenna and mounted on the same pole the DirectTV satellite dish came off using the same cables and can seamlessly pull all broadcast stations in from Madison and Rockford. Yes, I too have been struggling to fill my sports fix. I'm a big NASCAR fan and have been able to substitute with radio/live video from NASCAR website/ and the occasional web stream through JUSTINTV (on Roku). Milwaukee Brewer games are a different story but then again I don't really miss them with the lousy way they've been playing. We got a Roku box and Amazon Prime so all in all the expenditures were about $175 + 1yr of Prime for $79. I've already spent less in the same time than I would have on our DirectTV bills and am now pocketing the savings for a future vacation.
Aug 17, 2012 at 11:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
As a college student, money is tight to begin with now add on a $70 monthly Charter bill (which includes basic cable and internet) and things are extremely tight. I have been considering dropping the cable at the end of the year when my contract is up. Since I am not home often and really only watch a few shows I could easily do without. I do have Netflix and, like the author, I can download TV episodes online. I wish you could customize your cable plan such as picking the channels you receive therefore you only pay for the ones you actually watch. You're right... Charter should be nervous.
Aug 17, 2012 at 11:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
I'm the opposite. I didn't have cable for most of my life & bit the bullet when I had a child. I have uverse & love it. No technical issues. Price is ridiculous though.
Aug 17, 2012 at 10:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
I would love to cut the cord on all pay tv, I miss my old wyngard
Aug 17, 2012 at 10:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
We "cut the cord" three years ago. We do use Netflix and Hulu if there is something on that we wanted to see. Do I miss it? Not really. It is much quieter around here without the T.V.s in our house going when no one is really watching them.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.