Watching movies
Where do you watch movies?
Do you still go to a movie theater and enjoy a film?
Or do you sit down in front of a nice flat-screen television and watch a film on Blu-Ray? Perhaps you stream a movie from Netflix or get a rental from Redbox? Maybe you watch films on a phone?
I ask this question because movies, like many art forms in contemporary life, seem to be at a sort of crossroads. To a greater and greater extent, films are not films any longer. Even big-budget Hollywood films are switching to digital video. This switch is having the effect of changing the business from stem to stern. Recently, it was announced that professional film cameras will no longer be manufactured—by anyone.
Recently, I watched the documentary film "Side By Side." The movie was written and directed by Chris Kenneally. It is co-produced and hosted by Keanu Reeves, who does the interviewing in the film. "Side By Side" collects interviews with dozens of directors, producers, cinematographers and actors to ask if the film era is over. While some say they will keep working with film, they pretty much agree that, in fact, the film era is over.
Along the course of its 100 minutes or so, the film touches on many different aspects of modern movies. It offers a primer on how film and digital video work and a long look at the transition that is going on in Hollywood.
If you are film buff, I highly recommend it.
"Side By Side" was just released theatrically but I watched it via video on demand in my living room. This isn’t just ironic, it is telling. I have not been to a movie theater in at least five years. I am sorry to say this. I miss going to see films on a big screen in a darkened room with a lot of other people. This is how films should be seen.
A lot of the reason for this lies with me. Unfortunately, a lot of it also lies with the movie exhibition industry. Many movie theaters are mediocre places at best to watch a film. And then there are all the petty annoyances: the endless trailers to start out, the people who insist on continuing their discussions during films, uncomfortable seats, sticky floors, and, worst of all, poor prints that are often screened incorrectly. And all that does not even include the expense of a ticket. You’re on your own if you want some popcorn and a soda.
Movie attendance in 2011 fell to its lowest level in 16 years, according to a story in the Hollywood Reporter. That story reported that attendance in 2011 was down 4.4 percent from 2010. The trend appeared to have continued in 2012. According to a story in the Mail Online (a British website), attendance in 2012 was at a 25-year low. And numbers were down 40 percent from 2002.
Under the circumstances, I accept the diminished experience of a film in my home as the lesser of two evils.
What is your experience? Are movies still best seen in a theater? Or do you watch them at home as well? Please share your experiences with us.
Follow Shawn Sensiba on Twitter @shawnsensiba.

Sep 22, 2012 at 9:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
"Charge half price and run an old movie, such as "Casablanca" or "Gone With The Wind" (The 1947 version of "Miracle on 34th Street" would be great for the Christmas season) and a couple of old cartoons, or an episode of one of those old serials, such as the Commando Cody, Flash Gordon, Buck Rogers, or Zorro. They could even toss in an old newsreel film from the pre-television days of theater. They could have double-feature Saturday matinees with old cowboy movies. I think they'd do more than enough volume in tickets to compensate for the discounted price"
cool idea- some of the old action movies too. Star Wars, Super man. etc. The did do Titanic again-missed it. Wasn't there very long. Do the old Titanic.
Sep 22, 2012 at 12:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
At home. Big TV, surround sound. No one else talking. No crazy people. No head lice. No one coughing on my back, no over-priced popcorn...etc Peace
Sep 21, 2012 at 10:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
I like to watch movies in the theater occasionally, but the industry is urging me to stay home. I like science fiction, but I'm Batman and Spidey'ed out. I've also seen enough Superman. The Avengers might have a couple of good movies left in them. I don't care to see any more "Alien" or "Predator"-style monster movies, no matter what planet they are based on, or how they arrive on Earth. I think "Independence Day" topped off my quota of invading alien movies.
I don't care to see remakes (or reboots), no matter who is starring. Nobody is going to touch Edmund Gwenn as Kris Kringle, or Clayton Moore as the Lone Ranger, or Arnold Schwarzenegger as Conan the Barbarian or Matt Damon as Jason Bourne.
I also am not interested in animation films - I don't care who is doing the voices. Other than James Earl Jones, I can't think of an actor/actress who deserves more than the scale pay a recent graduate with a BA in Drama would get for reading an animation character's lines.
Ticket prices are high, and I paid the 3-D surcharge once, for "Avatar" - to see what the fuss was about - but I haven't seen a film in 3-D since. I wish Wildwood would run more independent films, like Sundance. I don't begrudge the extra ticket price for them as much as the drive to Madison. Since the local theaters serve Pepsi instead of Coke, I skip eating and drinking there, and save a lot more money.
The advertising run before the trailers is really annoying. If they want to sell more seats, they should make one of their screens a nostalgia theater. Charge half price and run an old movie, such as "Casablanca" or "Gone With The Wind" (The 1947 version of "Miracle on 34th Street" would be great for the Christmas season) and a couple of old cartoons, or an episode of one of those old serials, such as the Commando Cody, Flash Gordon, Buck Rogers, or Zorro. They could even toss in an old newsreel film from the pre-television days of theater. They could have double-feature Saturday matinees with old cowboy movies. I think they'd do more than enough volume in tickets to compensate for the discounted price.
Sep 21, 2012 at 4:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
CitizenX - My thoughts exactly. I couldn't agree more!
Sep 21, 2012 at 3:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
Depends on the movie. I couldn't imagine, for instance, NOT seeing "Avatar" on the big screen. If I think the special effects in a movie are "above and beyond" the norm, I will definitely make the effect to get to the theatre to see it first. I do also like to patronize our local $4 "budget" theatre. They seem to get the popular movies pretty quickly, and it's do-able for $4 (if I can avoid the concession stand.) Otherwise, I fear Netflix has most of my attention.
Sep 21, 2012 at 3:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
no better way to see a movie then going to a location where they have movies in the park under the stars and on a blanket or lawn chair. Janesville had 4 of them at Optimist park this summer with attendance over 450 viewers per movie
Sep 21, 2012 at 2:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Don't forget to turn off that phone.
http://www.cbc.ca/strombo/arts-and-enter...
Sep 21, 2012 at 12:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
As a typical baby boomer, my hearing is poor in noisy situations. The volume in theaters, along with the over-bearing musical background or traffic noises, etc. that movies have keeps me from understanding what the heck the actors are saying.
Hearing aids are worthless in this situation.
Thus, I only watch at home with closed captioning.
Sep 21, 2012 at 12:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
I can't wear my jammies to the movies nor bring a pillow and a blanket."
walmat shoppers dont seem to care!
Sep 21, 2012 at 10:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
I borrow movies from Hedberg. They have a great selection, always have the new movies, and I enjoy watching them at home. It's too expensive to go to the movies, plus I can't wear my jammies to the movies nor bring a pillow and a blanket.
Sep 20, 2012 at 3:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
neat have to start all over- wont display page.
I prefer home. Like Sigma said seats now to small, to close, not enough bev holders. Ones downtown were better. The theaters now seem gross. True people don't have mannors. Any age too not just teens. Don't prefer to hear the man two rows back eating his popcorn.
I like the butter on the popcorn but it runs out of the bottom so I bring my own bowl or baggie now. I stained two pair of pants now. Yes I tried Dawn-ASAP it wont come out. Not sure why it has to be an icebox in there during the summer. Do they think the theater will full? The last two movies I watched the preview were on AUDIO only. Silly to watch previews with no picture. I do a lot of dinner and movie with clickthecoup. It is a good deal. I will watch Clint Eastwood next movie. He is pretty cool.
I don't like the 3-d. The glasses are better than the cardboard ones. Suggestion- don't sit near the end with one of the lamps on wall near you. The reflection on glasses was terrible. I was with a group or I would have moved.
hg- sounds fun-outdoor in the garage.
Sep 20, 2012 at 3 p.m.
Suggest removal
Sadly I rarely go to theater anymore, for all the reasons your responders mentioned. The cost, lack of cleanliness,sound level and poor manners of the audience. That said however there are films from the past and present that require an auditorium. Films such as Lawrence of Arabia or any David lean film. Others like Saving Private Ryan with the proper sound system or 2001. All lose a lot on a television, I don't care the size. Some films just need that "wow" factor. All that said I have some great childhood memories of spending an afternoon in the Myers, Beverly, Jefferies and the Hitching Post. Television can be great, but a movie theater transports one a different reality.
Sep 20, 2012 at 2:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
I will continue to support movies on the silver screen, Drive-ins, and streaming. I love the medium, the presentation, the whole sensory experience.
Yes, I have a set-up in my home, I do watch films on my mobile device, and will continue to do so.
But if I want more of something, good quality something, my expected level of something, bigger, better, louder something, I better support it and the places that show them.
So I will buy the popcorn, soda, and candy treats and be transported to a magical world of flickering frame rates be it 24 or 48. Widescreen, full frame, IMAX, glorious 70 mm or whatever comes along (Film or digital), it is a wonderfully entreating art form.
My favorite job ever was a projectionist, miss it all the time. Magic!
Sep 20, 2012 at 2:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
I like to go to a movie in a theater. I think most of the seats at the Wildwood Theatre are comfortable. My only complaint is that it is so dark when you enter the theater that it is difficult to find a seat. They have lights but don't turn them on. Their $10.00 special on Tuesday for ticket, popcorn and soda is a good deal.
The Sundance Theatre in Madison has very comfortable and roomy seats. Some other Madison theaters are very nice as well.
I usually see one movie a week in a theater and 2 or three at home on the wide screen. I agree with the previous comment about "action movies", but there are still some movies made with good plots and acting.
Sep 20, 2012 at 1:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Home. But I have a media room so it is essentially a small theater.
Sep 20, 2012 at 12:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
I would prefer to watch movies any day over the stupid make no sense sitcoms that are on the tube now adays. We have the big wide screen in the living room and try to find a movie at the end of the day to sit and relax to as often as we can. On the nice warm summer nights we sometimes take out the 108" pull down screen and set it up outside on the garage and take the overhead prector and set it up and watch a movie or two outside. It has a reminance of the old outdoor theaters. The neighbors come over and we all pull up a lawn chair and have a nice time watching a movie. We have cable selections, netflicks, and a ton of dvd's so there isn't much we cannot see.
Sep 20, 2012 at 11:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
I don't watch many movies at all. Maybe one a month...maybe, but here are my observations...
I would prefer to watch them in a theater. I don't complain about the food prices, because I don't eat it. It seems silly that folks cant sit for two hours without shoving something in their mouth. I don't mind the crowded chairs either. I usually go with my wife, and we snuggle close anyways. Bench seats with no armrest would do just fine. I'm not a fan of the trailers. We usually walk in 10 minutes late to miss most of them. My biggest complaint is that THEY ARE TOO LOUD!!!!!!. Are we that hard of hearing?
Too many movies these days are digital. I'll take a good plot and great acting over special effects any day. Blow up this, crash into that, shoot a million rounds through high tech weapons (without ever hitting anything), and an hour and a half later they call it a movie. There are many great actors out there. Too bad they are all too often handcuffed by directors and producers.
Sep 20, 2012 at 8:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
I think theaters around here have gone down hill. I remember the downtown theater had nice comfortable seats and nice spacing. The ones now are worse than public transit seats and so squished together you have to share an arm rest with the person next to you. That compounded by the price for food and drink...HA! I see a free one once in awhile, but i'd never pay. Sitting at home watching one is way better though. Although the 3D Avatar was amazing and I couldnt duplicate that at home.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.