Grade Tax

By JAMES MARTIN   Tuesday, November 13, 2012 - 7:57 p.m.

It is great to see you after such an historic victory. You, as college students, have come out strong in support of your beliefs. The greedy rich are not doing their fair share to help the less fortunate, regardless of the cause of the misfortune. It is not right for some to benefit, while others go wanting. And I, as your professor, share in your belief. As such, this class will be graded utilizing the standard of your ideal world.

There are thirty of you registered in this class. As of this point in the semester, eight of you have As, twelve have Bs, ten have Cs, four have Ds, and the remaining six are failing this course. In light of your views on redistribution, I as your professor cannot allow this injustice to remain. Therefore, I must redistribute your "earned points" regardless of your efforts or the quality of your work.

I have thus taken sufficient points from you, the A and B students, and redistributed them to the others, especially the failing students. Congratulations Mr. Smith, though you have failed each test, not attended half the lectures, and submitted your last paper with more errors than a remedial sixth grader, you have benefitted from this new redistribution plan. Ms. Jones and Mr. Jackson, your motivation has shown in your excellent work and hard earned high grades. But the majority has spoken; we must heed to their will.

So I have assessed a "tax" upon the A and B student points and given them to the C, D, and the failing students. I know you understand that this is the only fair way to compensate each one of you regardless of your effort, work product, and knowledge of this subject.

The redistribution of student's points, in a fair allocation, results in an outcome that each of you now has a C-. Obviously, all of you benefit in this fairness model. With that, the final exam is worth sixty percent of your grade. I will first assign the earned grade and then apply the fairness redistribution (a.k.a. the grade tax) which will result in the actual grade on your final exam.

Good morning again students. I must say I am very disappointed in your final exams. It appears many of you did not even try. You must have decided not to work as hard because you were not going to receive the reciprocal benefit of your own work. It is as if you expected to receive your fair share of another's hard work.

Prior to redistributing your grades, one person earned a B-, two earned a C, five earned a C-, four earned a D, eight earned a D-, and ten of you failed. After the grade tax, each of you earned a D- on the final exam. As such, your final grade in this course is a D-. Congratulations, your fair share is richly deserved.

I hope that this course has lived up to your expectations. You should be proud that you all earned a D-. It is only through your shared effort that this grade was achieved by all. Because of this redistribution no one fails, yet for some strange reason no one excels either.

There is however, exciting news for you. As a result of this new system of fairness, all standards for entry in to medical, dental, law, and graduate schools have been eliminated. It is unfair to only admit the most qualified, the best of the best; so from here on Forward, your reward shall be according to the average effort of all. Welcome to the D- real world. After all, it is only fair.

Jim is am an attorney and graduate of Gonzaga University and Marquette Law School. He lives in Spring Prairie near Burlington. He has been in private practice for 17 years. He is in the process of closing his practice due to a diagnosis of Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). He his married with 6 kids. Jim is a community blogger and is not a part of the Gazette staff. His opinion is not necessarily that of the Gazette staff or management.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(16)
windatmyback
Nov 15, 2012 at 9:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

HOLY CANNOLI! WHAT A TREMENDOUS ANALOGY!

rock
Nov 14, 2012 at 11:31 p.m.
Suggest removal

Awesome idea, motorman.

But instead of letting the red states go, could we just let the red members go? While we're at it, the red members can take all of their assets, land and property and go as well? Blue members can maintain their party and new country with their net value.

I 'm not sure about my numbers, but the reds, approximately 40-46% of the population, will reclaim value of roughly 90% of the country (just estimating).

The blues, 54-60%, can occupy their respective remainder.

We'd even let the blues have first choice of their proportionate piece first. All according to value, of course.

Heck, we'll even throw in an extra 1% of red value to sweeten the pot.

I'm sure that it wouldn't take too long before Buffet and the ghost of Jobs to jump ship.

Then, we're all happy.

mteg
Nov 14, 2012 at 11:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

Actually Sigma...it would be the Divided Welfare States of America, given the rash of states toying with leaving the union (or lack of one).

JoyM
Nov 14, 2012 at 9:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

I don't think it's a bad analogy at all, a darn good one, actually. In fact, it is frighteningly reminiscent of the Communist methods that drove the alcoholism rate sky high in Russia - despair and hopelessness of ever seeing light at the end of the tunnel might do that to you. It all comes down to WHY SHOULD I BOTHER? and eventually ends up in a result like Greece's government spiral. When nobody bothers, there's nobody producing to provide for all those who aren't bothering to produce, and no one gets anything or anywhere.

gravitylens
Nov 14, 2012 at 9:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

Bad metaphors make valid points seem trite and trivial. You've done conservative ideals more harm than good. Hardly what that point of view needs right now.

meemaw
Nov 14, 2012 at 9:18 a.m.
Suggest removal

Rightly said. At a time when words of wisdom have the priority more than ever in one's life. Liberalism/Progressivism: is an inability to recognize an unrealistic Utopian ideal with reality due to the mistaken belief that life should be fair regardless of merit or effort.

saxcat70
Nov 14, 2012 at 7:34 a.m.
Suggest removal

Jim, rather disappointed in this post. You have given us so many insightful posts on life, particularly yours. Those are the ones I've enjoyed.

Sigma40
Nov 14, 2012 at 6:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

I think the analogy is perfect. It goes to show why so many are for it is because they are all failing. Obama was elected by unanimous failure and I couldnt agree more. All this hype of this class and that class and how one might be worse or better off... It all boils down to YOU. Only you can better yourself...or so it should be. When we going to change the name of this country to the United Welfare States of America?

theone
Nov 13, 2012 at 11:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

First of all brwe...what percentage of juries are made up of voters? Any resources to back up the claim? I will concede that by a purely statistical point, some voters will be on a jury.

But, more importantly...the context of comparing apples to oranges is the dominant point of my comment.

I give credit to James Martin in applying his lawyerly skills while making this episode of his blog about politics.

brwe
Nov 13, 2012 at 11:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

So, because the last election went your way, "the voters are much smarter than most juries" (which are made up of voters)?

theone
Nov 13, 2012 at 10:31 p.m.
Suggest removal

Actually...yes it is excellent.

But only in the context of an attorney doing an excellent job to confuse the jury with a lot of comparing the characteristics and taste and smell of an apple to an orange.

Fortunately, the voters are much smarter than most juries.

Sigma40
Nov 13, 2012 at 9:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

Excellent!

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT